Polyamory General - Polyamory drama from Facebook, Reddit, and more

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I have a sneaking suspicion he won't go down on his wife and he's unforgivably bad at sex. I noticed he did not mention anything about "I asked my wife why she won't fuck me, and this is what she said."

There has go to be something going on that killed the bedroom, which he's avoiding. Maybe he let himself go and is fat now. Maybe his hygiene has gotten awful. Maybe he makes no effort to be sexy and fashionable. Maybe he doesn't take his wife out on dates. Maybe his wife is depressed. Maybe his kinks are disgusting. Whatever it is, he didn't "learn" he's poly. He came to the conclusion poly might be good because the bedroom is dead and he wants sex.

I wonder if they have kids. Taking care of the kids, doing household chores, or having to do not only that but also having a job - all while the guy works the same amount of hours in his job but has his free time all for himself once he gets home. Damn, even if they don't have kids but she's still expected to have a job and do the household chores on her own while he sits on his ass doing nothing to help her. It not only drains a woman's energy, but it breeds resentment. And women in general can't be "in the mood" if something is bothering them like that.

Hopefully she will leave him. Regardless of her reasons for not wanting sex with him, I can't imagine how awful it must be to share 15 years of your life - a big part of your youth - with someone you looked forward to spend your whole life with, just to be discarded because you aren't a warm hole to him anymore.
 
It's shorter than "The person who is cuckolding you" but far less descriptive.
Not really, as metamour doesn't watch who is the cuck and who is the cuckolder. As long as they are both in relationship with same person knowingly, they are each other's metamours. You get to sleep with a married woman without expectations of commitment, meta to the husband. Your husband has after hours thing with your babysitter, meta to the babysitter. Your girlfriend has a lesbian couple that she does regular threesome with, meta to the lesbians. One those wierd free love hippy farm, meta to god knows who but there are lot them and they don't believe in shampoo but do have tons of weed.
 
Last edited:
On tonight’s episode of polyamerous deviants: Poly adoption!

FDBC010C-1EA1-4C68-AE0B-2C4B3F407AD1.jpeg

Three gay men want to adopt a child.

(And here I thought adoption was all about giving an unwanted child a family, guess I was wrong all along. It’s about equipping gay “triads” with an accessory.)
 
On tonight’s episode of polyamerous deviants: Poly adoption!

View attachment 1585768

Three gay men want to adopt a child.

(And here I thought adoption was all about giving an unwanted child a family, guess I was wrong all along. It’s about equipping gay “triads” with an accessory.)
My immediate thought is, that one gay couple who were praised for adopting a boy in the news, and then like 2 years later were caught pimping out their adopted baby.
 
Over the years I've heard stories from multiple girls raised by single moms about being molested/raped by mom's boyfriend, so I completely believe this.
It's not just molestation. Look up children killed by their mothers boyfriend. Try not to have eaten first.

Women who intentionally choose single parenthood then take up with the first bit of dick that stiffens near then should be sterilised. A perpetual merry go round if mummy's boyfriend will fuck a,kid right up
 
It's not just molestation. Look up children killed by their mothers boyfriend. Try not to have eaten first.

Women who intentionally choose single parenthood then take up with the first bit of dick that stiffens near then should be sterilised. A perpetual merry go round if mummy's boyfriend will fuck a,kid right up
WOW google OK, I see how you feel about BLM

1599835920177.png
 
WOW google OK, I see how you feel about BLM

I was thinking specifically of this case in the UK, if I'm honest. A seventeen month old boy, killed by his "Mother" and her boyfriend.


Abortion and contraception are free at the point of use in the UK. And putting a child up for adoption, while lengthy, is not impossible. If Tracy Connolly, his parent, really wanted to go out and get the dick more than raise the child she chose to bring to term then there were options. That's the problem with a welfare state that incentivises single parent hood though.


Personally, I've had difficult financial periods, and I didn't care if the help I got was financial or material, so long as I was able to eat and live in a place until I got back on my feet (the caveat being I have been fortunate and not had things that badly or for too long). Perhaps if we removed the financial element of it, and stopped giving cashmonies, there would be a drop in wholly unfit women cashing in on their poor choices?
 
Perhaps if we removed the financial element of it, and stopped giving cashmonies, there would be a drop in wholly unfit women cashing in on their poor choices?
this applies to all forms of welfare
"we cant let people go homeless and hungry" is usually the argument for it - so put them in dedicated communal housing. bunk beds, communal kitchen and cafeteria, regimented 9 to 5 work day, that kind of thing. limiting public welfare to this kind of arrangement would quickly eliminate all the lazy fucks who leech off it.

as long as welfare literally means that the taxpayer foots the bill for providing high class living standards to parasites free of charge, it will always be abused on a large scale. do nothing and get a better life for it than a lot of the people who pay taxes to finance that shit? that's simply WAY too good of a deal to pass up for shameless lowlifes.
 
this applies to all forms of welfare
"we cant let people go homeless and hungry" is usually the argument for it - so put them in dedicated communal housing. bunk beds, communal kitchen and cafeteria, regimented 9 to 5 work day, that kind of thing. limiting public welfare to this kind of arrangement would quickly eliminate all the lazy fucks who leech off it.

as long as welfare literally means that the taxpayer foots the bill for providing high class living standards to parasites free of charge, it will always be abused on a large scale. do nothing and get a better life for it than a lot of the people who pay taxes to finance that shit? that's simply WAY too good of a deal to pass up for shameless lowlifes.
To be honest, I agree with that for the people who refuse to get themselves out of work. However, there's a world of difference between, say, person laid off with two weeks, to a month in between jobs, who actively spends their time looking for a new job or other work. It's inevitable - more so these days given BLMs proepnsity for burnign shit down - that people will be paid off at least once in their lives. And if a person's reaction to that is "well, I'll work at finding a new job" then I see no need to limit their freedoms.

For me, the perpetual and habitual unemployed, who refuse to seek work, who are a massive issue. Thy've no drive to even find work because the gibsmedat mentality has been fostered and ingrained in them since childhood.
 
as long as welfare literally means that the taxpayer foots the bill for providing high class living standards to parasites free of charge, it will always be abused on a large scale. do nothing and get a better life for it than a lot of the people who pay taxes to finance that shit? that's simply WAY too good of a deal to pass up for shameless lowlifes.
It should be two hots and a cot, anything else is too much and incentivizes being a parasite.
 
For me, the perpetual and habitual unemployed, who refuse to seek work, who are a massive issue. Thy've no drive to even find work because the gibsmedat mentality has been fostered and ingrained in them since childhood.
and the worst part about this situation is that their choice is rational and correct. if such a person were to get off welfare and take up a shitty job instead, their living standards and disposable income would go down significantly.
for a lot of people, welfare literally pays better than work, and on top of that it comes with a fuckton of free time. when those are your options, then you'd have to be a fucking masochist to not choose welfare. that is the reason why this underclass of parasitic leeches exists in such large numbers today.
 
My immediate thought is, that one gay couple who were praised for adopting a boy in the news, and then like 2 years later were caught pimping out their adopted baby.
The forst gay male couple to adopt in the UK? They've now divorced because one of them is now fucking one of their children's exes. I wish I was fucking making this up, What sort of creature goes for their teen kids sloppy seconds????


Apparently, Saffron, the ex girlfriend of the boy involved has "given her blessing". Some people might go "aaaawww, so cute!!" but to me all that says is the fucking degeneracy has been passed down to her. Utterly disgusting, the nerve and gall of these grotesque beings knows no limits. The fact they went to the press is even worse.
 
On tonight’s episode of polyamerous deviants: Poly adoption!

View attachment 1585768

Three gay men want to adopt a child.

(And here I thought adoption was all about giving an unwanted child a family, guess I was wrong all along. It’s about equipping gay “triads” with an accessory.)

Hold on, I've seen the documentary about this, highly recommend it for Kiwis:

three_men_and_a_baby.jpg
 
You know, some people are born gay, some people are born bisexual. Some people are born asexual. And some people are born with the urge to slam new and unexplored vaginas without going through a messy divorce! Don’t be a bigot!

It infuriates me. The past couple years have been the first time I’ve felt ashamed about being gay since I graduated high school in the mid 00s. If someone compared “polyamory” to homosexuality back then, the “progressive” left would have called him a homophobe. Now, they’d praise him for his “tolerance.” It’s the same way that separate events for different races used to be considered segregation; but this summer, in Seattle, white “allies“ formed a human chain around a park space “reserved” for “people of color.”

It’s not a coincidence that all of this started around the same time as Black Lives Matter. In a 2015 video, Patrice Cullors said she and the other two organizers are “trained Marxists” intent on “disrupt[ing] the Western-prescribed nuclear-family-structure requirement [sic].” A couple weeks ago, progressives mocked a speaker at the Republican National Convention for pointing it out, but anyone familiar with critical race theory, “queer” theory, and intersectional feminism knows Cullors really meant what she said.

If you’re not familiar with this stuff and want to learn more, read The Victims’ Revolution by Bruce Bawer, a gay conservative commentator. It’s eye-opening. James Lindsay and Helen Pluckrose, two liberals, just released a new book, Cynical Theories, on the same topic, but I haven’t read it yet.

Incidentally, Bawer, Andrew Sullivan, Jonathan Rauch, and other politically heterodox gay writers are the ones responsible for redirecting gay activists’ focus to marriage equality in the 90s, which enraged radical leftists. (Google “same-sex marriage” and “cis gay white men” to see what I mean.) Nobody paid much attention to their criticism because they were holed up in obscure university departments.
 
On tonight’s episode of polyamerous deviants: Poly adoption!

View attachment 1585768

Three gay men want to adopt a child.

(And here I thought adoption was all about giving an unwanted child a family, guess I was wrong all along. It’s about equipping gay “triads” with an accessory.)

Giving a group of gay men a child, what could go wrong?
 
Back
Top Bottom