Post-Modernism - Or How 3 French Cunts Fucked Up the West

All intersectionality does is ask the State to incorporate the oppressed and marginalized into the function of its structures, whereas the old solidarity implies a cross-identity coalition to abolish the system which necessitates oppression and marginalization in the first place.

The glaring contradiction, of course, is that this managed diversity robs multiculturalism of its potential to be a progressive force and creates a new form of conservatism, along with a monoculture. Each identity or cluster of identities is given their space and allowed to do whatever it takes to preserve it, and the private sector profits handsomely as massive corporations offer their commodities to these spaces in support of this task. Thus, the tools used by the myriad of identities all come from the same monopolies, making any individuality a mere narcissism of small differences, usually dependent upon who has the most money to continuously update their identities ability to present itself as unique among the ocean of the marginalized. In this scenario, multiculturalism functions as little more than an ad campaign which reassures the oppressed and the marginalized that reform of the system, and certainly not revolutionary work aimed at overthrowing the system, is necessary because Amazon Prime will sell to you no matter your creed, color, gender identity, or sexual orientation.

Intersectionality and all of these other recent developments in western "leftism" are actually quite conservative. They're a good example of the whole Lacanian conception of a pervert as someone who may initially appear to be revolutionary but over time exposes themselves as one of the least revolutionary people imaginable because their "subversive" actions aren't oriented toward changing social structures they just get off on being subversive, so when the market gives them a cultural space and provides them the tools to do so to their hearts content they end up actually perpetuating the current social arrangement in an even more efficient manner than in an overt police state.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Occluded Front, Mexican_Wizard_711, BR55 and 3 others
ICametoLurk said:
All intersectionality does is ask the State to incorporate the oppressed and marginalized into the function of its structures, whereas the old solidarity implies a cross-identity coalition to abolish the system which necessitates oppression and marginalization in the first place.

The glaring contradiction, of course, is that this managed diversity robs multiculturalism of its potential to be a progressive force and creates a new form of conservatism, along with a monoculture. Each identity or cluster of identities is given their space and allowed to do whatever it takes to preserve it, and the private sector profits handsomely as massive corporations offer their commodities to these spaces in support of this task. Thus, the tools used by the myriad of identities all come from the same monopolies, making any individuality a mere narcissism of small differences, usually dependent upon who has the most money to continuously update their identities ability to present itself as unique among the ocean of the marginalized. In this scenario, multiculturalism functions as little more than an ad campaign which reassures the oppressed and the marginalized that reform of the system, and certainly not revolutionary work aimed at overthrowing the system, is necessary because Amazon Prime will sell to you no matter your creed, color, gender identity, or sexual orientation.

Intersectionality and all of these other recent developments in western "leftism" are actually quite conservative. They're a good example of the whole Lacanian conception of a pervert as someone who may initially appear to be revolutionary but over time exposes themselves as one of the least revolutionary people imaginable because their "subversive" actions aren't oriented toward changing social structures they just get off on being subversive, so when the market gives them a cultural space and provides them the tools to do so to their hearts content they end up actually perpetuating the current social arrangement in an even more efficient manner than in an overt police state.
Click to expand...
And so on and soon.

*sniff*
 
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Feels
Reactions: BR55, Trilby, AnOminous and 1 other person
ICametoLurk said:
All intersectionality does is ask the State to incorporate the oppressed and marginalized into the function of its structures, whereas the old solidarity implies a cross-identity coalition to abolish the system which necessitates oppression and marginalization in the first place.

The glaring contradiction, of course, is that this managed diversity robs multiculturalism of its potential to be a progressive force and creates a new form of conservatism, along with a monoculture. Each identity or cluster of identities is given their space and allowed to do whatever it takes to preserve it, and the private sector profits handsomely as massive corporations offer their commodities to these spaces in support of this task. Thus, the tools used by the myriad of identities all come from the same monopolies, making any individuality a mere narcissism of small differences, usually dependent upon who has the most money to continuously update their identities ability to present itself as unique among the ocean of the marginalized. In this scenario, multiculturalism functions as little more than an ad campaign which reassures the oppressed and the marginalized that reform of the system, and certainly not revolutionary work aimed at overthrowing the system, is necessary because Amazon Prime will sell to you no matter your creed, color, gender identity, or sexual orientation.

Intersectionality and all of these other recent developments in western "leftism" are actually quite conservative. They're a good example of the whole Lacanian conception of a pervert as someone who may initially appear to be revolutionary but over time exposes themselves as one of the least revolutionary people imaginable because their "subversive" actions aren't oriented toward changing social structures they just get off on being subversive, so when the market gives them a cultural space and provides them the tools to do so to their hearts content they end up actually perpetuating the current social arrangement in an even more efficient manner than in an overt police state.
Click to expand...

It's conservative in that it's fundamentally selfish. The various tribes are balkanized due to the deconstruction of terms like "woman" and more interested in their own self-esteem than any attempt to join in coalition for a common cause. Indeed, not only can't they join forces, they shouldn't, because that would dilute their own personal cultural identity. What's left is a zero-sum politics that embraces despair, pessimism and selfishness. By seizing as much as possible for one's self and group, it exposes its complete disregard for the whole from which it has separated - for the rest of the society. Identity politics thus rejects the search for a just and comprehensive solution to social problems.

And how dare you make me speak academese on my day off!
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: BR55
What do you mean about Cultural Marxism being made up?

Cultural Marxism is basically a Right-wing term for the Frankfurt School and its intellectual descendants, and it includes figures like Theodore Adorno, Max Horkheimer, and Herbert Marcuse. Of course, many of these figures are Jews, but that's a ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((coincidence))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))).

The way I've always been taught it (and it seems pretty obvious, considering what the Left openly does and advocates for) is that the Cultural Marxists believed that culture was getting in the way of communist revolution by creating false consciousness. They were distracting the proletariat with race, sex, and other non-economic differences. So, they would prepare the culture for communism by dismantling other systematic inequalities before directly attacking economic inequality.

It's more of an ideology than it is a "conspiracy theory," but Leftists call anything they don't want the public to look at a conspiracy theory.
 
Side note: I had this one class where the professor was telling a Seminole creation story about how the three races (White, Black, Red) were made. I mentioned to him a scientific theory from a 13th Century Islamic philosopher which had some similarities. In the process, I used the phrase "and the Blacks were overcooked by the southern heat, making them less intelligent," or something like that. In context, it was obvious I was referring to the perspective of the philosopher. But, I heard this one red-haired bitch in the back whisper to another girl, "Does he know what he's saying?"

Yes, cunt, I know what I'm saying, and unlike you I don't give a shit.

Later on I heard her praise one of our assigned books for its "intersectionality."

Ever since then I've wanted to see her obituary in the news.
 
I'll just leave these two videos from a lesbian Troon for those willing to check. One of them is 30 minutes long, and the other is an hour long where he supposedly claims Tolkien incorporated post modernism in his works.


 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back