The Tenth Dentist
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2023
"Post your Art" Thread
- Thread starter The Hunter
- Start date
-
🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
The Tenth Dentist
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2023
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2015
Some short-form scheiße.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2020
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2021
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2021
Sorry for the doubleposting, but progress so far:
The White Box Studio
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2020
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2022
Been dining on the finest poopoo productivity-wise lately; seeking refuge in sketching characters with huge arms.
2. Had to look up what a "barontess" is. It's spelled "baronetess", apparently.
3. This one:
I'd personally explore that direction a little further.
This one:
What's going on here, exactly? It does look interesting, but not quite human.
4. These look flashy and cool but a little busy. Assassin's Creed much?
5. Out of the three, №2 is a personal favorite.
6. Last one - you never put a strap ON a boob; it will always slip.
7. "Rough sketches" would be quite the fitting description. As it is, there's not much to go on (for me, anyway); paging @Grotesquependulum for more advanced armor critique/comments.
lol this is VERY helpful feedback
In general, your figures are tastefully dynamic - specifically, in the bottom of image 1; poses are expressive, results are impressive. Very nice.
2. This is seriously smooth. Big props.
Now, goy, not everyone would be content with pimped-out stick figures as their comic protagonists. On the other hand, @NaggotFigger should stop procrastinating
1. If this is a main character, freckles may annoy some people as they're a bit of a trope.
2. Had to look up what a "barontess" is. It's spelled "baronetess", apparently.
3. This one:
I'd personally explore that direction a little further.
This one:
What's going on here, exactly? It does look interesting, but not quite human.
4. These look flashy and cool but a little busy. Assassin's Creed much?
5. Out of the three, №2 is a personal favorite.
6. Last one - you never put a strap ON a boob; it will always slip.
7. "Rough sketches" would be quite the fitting description. As it is, there's not much to go on (for me, anyway); paging @Grotesquependulum for more advanced armor critique/comments.
lol this is VERY helpful feedback
In general, your figures are tastefully dynamic - specifically, in the bottom of image 1; poses are expressive, results are impressive. Very nice.
Kinky shit. Did she end up getting gums?
So -that- is how you draw rabbit ears.
We're clearly missing some backstory but that composition is tight. It's a joy to look at.
1. Is the bald guy from Preacher, by any chance?
2. This is seriously smooth. Big props.
Last edited:
The Tenth Dentist
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2023
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2021
Stupid Cunthole
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 20, 2024
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2021
@Shlomo XL Oh man, I wish I was not that severely busy in life that my will to complete my shit was not heavily restrained 
Anyway, the 4koma is completed! I am still not good at making comedy 4komas or slice-of-life as a short comic in general, and is still shaky with it. This was completed 2 days ago; all 4 small frames are completed in 1 day.
Being a busy nigger was pretty much inflicting art block a lot.
Anyway, the 4koma is completed! I am still not good at making comedy 4komas or slice-of-life as a short comic in general, and is still shaky with it. This was completed 2 days ago; all 4 small frames are completed in 1 day.
Being a busy nigger was pretty much inflicting art block a lot.
Stupid Cunthole
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 20, 2024
Way back in January. I still don't know how to spoil shit so maybe this is the post I'll learn how
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2019
I definitely recommend a study of what ever sort of armor you intend to draw. Once you get comfortable with the shapes of the armor, you can stylize it as much as you want. Whenever you do studies you have to remember to apply it immediately on a small project personal or otherwise so you can retain the information.
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
something weird i did /w ballpoint and gel pens.
Marzipan Apple
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2024
A bit of an issue I have with your designs is that they don't clearly convey what the characters are supposed to be. I can tell that Dame Nic Bochra is some kind of warrior, but I know nothing about her aside from that. Her expressions, body language, and clothing/armor are too generic for me to glean any personality from her character.
The male character is much better since it's very apparent from his sharp-angled clothing that he's meant to be more villainous and sinister, or at least an antihero if not an outright villain. None of his designs are bad, but the best choice depends on what you're going for with the character. The top row designs imply a more rustic, itinerant character; the middle designs imply a more militant character, like a general or commander; and the bottom designs look more formal and imply that he's a noble or political figure. Again, go with whichever design best suits the character's personality and role.
You should also consider the silhouette when deciding on a design. The middle designs have much more distinct and recognizable silhouettes compared to the rest.
As for the art itself, you have a bit of a problem with proportions. A general rule of thumb is that the top of the head to the bottom of the crotch should be equal in length to the legs, similar to this Loomis drawing.
As you can see here, her legs are about half a head shorter than her upper body.
She's obviously meant to be a somewhat diminutive, thicc dwarfish character, so shorter than average legs makes sense, but her lopsided vertical proportions make her look awkward, especially considering her sexy, curvaceous appearance, which people usually associate with proportionally longer legs.
The male character looks better, but I still think his legs could stand to be a bit longer.
In general, longer legs look more aesthetic, and make characters appear more athletic and imposing (or sexy if the character is female). A lot of character designers and concept artists draw slightly longer legs for those reasons.
This character has a similar issue. Her thoracic section is way too long.
The pose on this drawing also looks a bit weird.
Since the axes of the shoulders and pelvis aren't parallel,
I assume you were going for a contrapposto pose, kind of like this.
But I think you misunderstood how body dynamics work. The weight-bearing foot should be vertically aligned with the body's center of gravity, which for women is approximately in the middle of the pelvis, around the location of the reproductive organs.
You seem to know what you're doing in this regard since you consistently align the foot with the pelvis.
The issue arises when we look at the overall body. If we draw a line through the centers of gravity, you'll see that the large majority of the bodies' mass is situated on one side.
These bodies aren't balanced. They'd likely fall over in real life.
A lot of artists like to simplify body dynamics and instead align the weight-bearing foot with the pit of the neck.
It's not completely accurate but usually looks fine, and typically avoids this imbalance problem by ensuring that the upper body is balanced.
If you weren't going for a contrapposto pose, then ignore my autistic tangent. Still, the pose on the right looks kind of awkward and could use a redraw.
The length of the legs also looks weird.
The difference in the lengths implies an extreme perspective angle, like this.
Notice how foreshortened the far legs are on these figures.
In your drawing, however, the feet are on pretty much the same level.
Those are the major problems I've noticed. Everything else is mostly just picking nits. There is a bit of wonk here and there though.
You generally have a very good grasp on anatomical perspective, something even a lot of experienced artists struggle with. This drawing is a bit of an outlier though.
Since we're looking down at her, her facial features should be aligned on a steep incline, similar to how her boobs are aligned.
You didn't make the same mistake on this drawing. This is really good.
And this girl's head should be skewed a bit to the left.
Sorry for ragging on your work so much. You really are a great artist, and I wouldn't be nitpicking so hard if your work wasn't as high quality as it is. I think if you improve on a few weak areas, your art would be next level.
If you don't mind my asking, what are these drawings for?
The male character is much better since it's very apparent from his sharp-angled clothing that he's meant to be more villainous and sinister, or at least an antihero if not an outright villain. None of his designs are bad, but the best choice depends on what you're going for with the character. The top row designs imply a more rustic, itinerant character; the middle designs imply a more militant character, like a general or commander; and the bottom designs look more formal and imply that he's a noble or political figure. Again, go with whichever design best suits the character's personality and role.
You should also consider the silhouette when deciding on a design. The middle designs have much more distinct and recognizable silhouettes compared to the rest.
As for the art itself, you have a bit of a problem with proportions. A general rule of thumb is that the top of the head to the bottom of the crotch should be equal in length to the legs, similar to this Loomis drawing.
As you can see here, her legs are about half a head shorter than her upper body.
She's obviously meant to be a somewhat diminutive, thicc dwarfish character, so shorter than average legs makes sense, but her lopsided vertical proportions make her look awkward, especially considering her sexy, curvaceous appearance, which people usually associate with proportionally longer legs.
The male character looks better, but I still think his legs could stand to be a bit longer.
In general, longer legs look more aesthetic, and make characters appear more athletic and imposing (or sexy if the character is female). A lot of character designers and concept artists draw slightly longer legs for those reasons.
This character has a similar issue. Her thoracic section is way too long.
The pose on this drawing also looks a bit weird.
Since the axes of the shoulders and pelvis aren't parallel,
I assume you were going for a contrapposto pose, kind of like this.
But I think you misunderstood how body dynamics work. The weight-bearing foot should be vertically aligned with the body's center of gravity, which for women is approximately in the middle of the pelvis, around the location of the reproductive organs.
You seem to know what you're doing in this regard since you consistently align the foot with the pelvis.
The issue arises when we look at the overall body. If we draw a line through the centers of gravity, you'll see that the large majority of the bodies' mass is situated on one side.
These bodies aren't balanced. They'd likely fall over in real life.
A lot of artists like to simplify body dynamics and instead align the weight-bearing foot with the pit of the neck.
It's not completely accurate but usually looks fine, and typically avoids this imbalance problem by ensuring that the upper body is balanced.
If you weren't going for a contrapposto pose, then ignore my autistic tangent. Still, the pose on the right looks kind of awkward and could use a redraw.
The length of the legs also looks weird.
The difference in the lengths implies an extreme perspective angle, like this.
Notice how foreshortened the far legs are on these figures.
In your drawing, however, the feet are on pretty much the same level.
Those are the major problems I've noticed. Everything else is mostly just picking nits. There is a bit of wonk here and there though.
You generally have a very good grasp on anatomical perspective, something even a lot of experienced artists struggle with. This drawing is a bit of an outlier though.
Since we're looking down at her, her facial features should be aligned on a steep incline, similar to how her boobs are aligned.
You didn't make the same mistake on this drawing. This is really good.
And this girl's head should be skewed a bit to the left.
Sorry for ragging on your work so much. You really are a great artist, and I wouldn't be nitpicking so hard if your work wasn't as high quality as it is. I think if you improve on a few weak areas, your art would be next level.
If you don't mind my asking, what are these drawings for?
waratteruN
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2023
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2021
Here are some extremely autistic gayop niggerfaggotry because I am a retard and a faggot nigger:
What I have said must be done, no matter the super autism I kept enduring. 
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2021
Tried to work on real animals and not furries for a change.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2018
https://x.com/thriveleak/status/1793573050769965115?s=46&t=yfDxBV71wwyJr-fLUuuANg new manul
Manic Manul: Salrate be Kidding me
Salina “Sal” Malvina emparts the deepest secrets of Chairkido onto her nobel (highest paying) students Jawn and Jimes. Wu-shu-nenigans ensues.files.catbox.moe/vtz18a.png
files.catbox.moe/r70pml.png
bts stuff
Manic Manul: Salrate be Kidding me
Salina “Sal” Malvina emparts the deepest secrets of Chairkido onto her nobel (highest paying) students Jawn and Jimes. Wu-shu-nenigans ensues.files.catbox.moe/vtz18a.png
files.catbox.moe/r70pml.png
bts stuff
Last edited: