Potential evidence of DSP using viewbots

[actually]

1,3k viewers on dsp twitch? yea i call bullshit. his average is 400-500 and thats factoring in big games

He's absolutely been viewbotted on Twitch. My point is that he didn't do it with Viewgrip as Viewgrip appears to only be for Youtube related stuff.

 

[Prince Lotor]

This reminds me of when I started doing internet searches from scratch trying to figure out where he may have gone to high school and found that at least 6 months previously people had registered him to multiple different high school alumni sites, to random schools, and uploaded his O-face as the profile pic to troll him. I think I'd be more surprised if his e-mail hadn't been previously registered, or been attempted to be, to a viewbot site tbh

It seems that in January someone registered Phillip Burnell as a class of 2000 alumni for Bassick High School in Bridgeport, CT and added photos to his photo gallery that are the picture of Phil in his cowboy hat used in the 'Down the Rabbit Hole' video thumbnail and another of his face just realizing the camera was on after his 'accident', they also previously seem to have added a Philip Burnell with 1 'L' as a Bassick High School alumni.

I don't think Phil would purchase viewbots, and if a fan was telling him some plan about using them I'm pretty sure Phil would tell them to just give him the money instead. I think any viewbotting is likely unbeknownst to Phil whether it's a fan, a 'detractor', or just some rando testing out his viewbots to see the results.

 

[SkippyLongbottom]

I don't think Phil would purchase viewbots, and if a fan was telling him some plan about using them I'm pretty sure Phil would tell them to just give him the money instead. I think any viewbotting is likely unbeknownst to Phil whether it's a fan, a 'detractor', or just some rando testing out his viewbots to see the results.

Hasn't he already been caught with DMs trying to shut down detractor channels? Seems like it would be a win for him if he could manage to somehow inflate Tevin's stream with bots so he could easily be reported for them if he has his henchmen do it. Ya know, eliminate the competition.
That's just my tinfoil hat theory though.

 

[Prince Lotor]

Hasn't he already been caught with DMs trying to shut down detractor channels? Seems like it would be a win for him if he could manage to somehow inflate Tevin's stream with bots so he could easily be reported for them if he has his henchmen do it. Ya know, eliminate the competition.
That's just my tinfoil hat theory though.

Right. There are DM's where he was directing a mod to flag 'detractor' videos, and wanted them to compile a list of detractor videos that seemed 'blatantly slanderous' so that he could report them himself. He was also happy and laughing with said mod about reports that channels the mod had flagged received Community Guideline strikes.

But these were all free things and Phil seemingly did nothing himself, besides engage in shittalking 'detractors' and encouraging the behavior, as the mod never compiled the list for him.

If he wanted to he could probably Content ID claim large portions of 'detractor' videos and monetize them, it would give hime something to do while he babysits his uploads. If he really wanted to it probably wouldn't be that hard for him to DMCA strike videos if he wanted to get really malicious. I think if he's too lazy to take the free options that could even potentially get him some shekels, then he's far to miserly to spend money to create an artificial situation to try to accomplish the same thing, especially since DSP is probably aware that viewbotting someone has almost zero chance of negatively effecting them.

 

[Wurstbrot]

Actually, even if he's really the one who sent the assassination-viewbots he would easily come out of it untouched because people register his name everywhere. He would have the perfect excuse. It's on par with the untouchable body he gained on Twitch where people report him for the smallest and irrelevant actions.

But try to direct a fly swarm, not possible.

 

[Comma]

Right. There are DM's where he was directing a mod to flag 'detractor' videos, and wanted them to compile a list of detractor videos that seemed 'blatantly slanderous' so that he could report them himself. He was also happy and laughing with said mod about reports that channels the mod had flagged received Community Guideline strikes.

But these were all free things and Phil seemingly did nothing himself, besides engage in shittalking 'detractors' and encouraging the behavior, as the mod never compiled the list for him.

In the DMs you're talking about DSP actually said that he reported/flagged channels/videos himself. Posted by @neger psykolog in March of this year here and here.

"I contacted Youtube and threatened them with legal action"

"I actually submitted that one"

"Submitted 10 channels"

However, the fact he did this doesn't say anything at all about the whole viewbot thing. Reporting channels/videos to Youtube while having a channel with 150K+ subs is a completely different thing than buying bots through some suspicious website.

 

[Wurstbrot]

However, the fact he did this doesn't say anything at all about the whole viewbot thing. Reporting channels/videos to Youtube while having a channel with 150K+ subs is a completely different thing than buying bots through some suspicious website.

Right. But these screens are still the best evidence against this bullshittery of him stating he never flagged or would never flag anyone, when in reality he (tried to) organize a wave of reports to bring these people down. It's always good to bring this up again. You can't trust his mouth.

 

[BrunoMattei]

 

[Comma]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=V5zSGQ75ZOk

@David Davidson

The conclusion that "Clearly, DSP registered and validated his email on this viewbot website" is one that lacks actual evidence.
A message on the login page saying that the email address needs to be confirmed is being compared to a message on the registration page saying that the email address has already been registered. Those are two completely different things, as I posted in "Potential evidence of DSP using viewbots". The way the website handles the registration process etc. makes it pretty much impossible to prove it was DSP who used the email address on that website.

I see David hasn't logged in on the Farms for months and I don't have Twitter, so I hope he sees this.

Stuff like this gives DSP actual ammo to keep touting that "lies and slander"-argument.

 

[BrunoMattei]

@David Davidson

[MEDIA=streamable]m7a1j[/MEDIA]The conclusion that "Clearly, DSP registered and validated his email on this viewbot website" is one that lacks actual evidence.
A message on the login page about the email address that needs to be confirmed is being compared to a message on the registration page saying the email address has already been registerend. Those are two completely different things, as I posted in "Potential evidence of DSP using viewbots". The way the website handles the registration process etc. makes it pretty much impossible to prove it was DSP who used the email address on that website.

I see David hasn't logged in on the Farms for months and I don't have Twitter, so I hope he sees this.

Stuff like this gives DSP actual ammo to keep touting that "lies and slander"-argument.

I was thinking the same thing. Sure, Phil is stupid enough to register to a site like that with his DSPGaming email. But it could also have been some random who registered with that email a long time ago. We don't know if the site requires you to verify the email to keep the profile active.

 

[David Davidson]

Logged back in to just say thanks for the added investigation. I for sure thought he registered it based on what I got without verifying the email and what I got when I tried with Phil's email and thought he did verify it. Good work.