Private Texts, Imposing Fines for Hate Speech - Doing this on mobile sucks

https://countylocalnews.com/article1/2023/12/26/breaking-t-mobile-considers-monitoring-private-texts-imposing-fines-for-hate-speech/

https://archive.is/hUF5q

BREAKING: T-Mobile Considers Monitoring Private Texts, Imposing Fines for Hate Speech
By admin | December 26, 2023

Major US Carrier T-Mobile Considering Software to Monitor Private Text Messages​

Breaking news has emerged regarding T-Mobile, one of the major US carriers, and its potential plans to implement software that would monitor all private text messages of citizens. This alarming development has sparked concerns about privacy and free speech among the general public.

Possible Fines for Hate Speech​

T-Mobile’s new software could also result in the imposition of massive fines for individuals deemed to be engaging in hate speech. This controversial move has created further outrage, with many fearing that it could infringe upon their freedom of expression and open the door to potential censorship.

Land of the Spied Upon & Home of the Sheep​

The White Rabbit Podcast, known for its critical stance on government surveillance, expressed its dismay over the situation in a recent tweet. Referring to the United States as the “Land of the Spied Upon & Home of the Sheep,” the podcast highlighted the growing concerns surrounding privacy issues.
As news of T-Mobile’s potential actions continues to circulate, the public’s response has been mixed. While some argue that monitoring private text messages is a necessary step to combat hate speech and ensure public safety, others view it as an invasion of privacy and an infringement on their civil liberties.

The Implications of Monitoring Private Text Messages​

If T-Mobile were to implement software capable of monitoring private text messages, it would have significant implications for individuals’ privacy. The company would gain access to personal conversations, potentially leading to the misuse of sensitive information. Furthermore, the potential for misidentifying hate speech or falsely accusing individuals raises concerns about the fairness and accuracy of such monitoring systems.

Public Outrage and Privacy Advocacy​

Several privacy advocacy groups have voiced their concerns, calling for transparency and accountability from T-Mobile. They argue that such a move could set a dangerous precedent and pave the way for further encroachments on privacy rights by other telecommunications companies.
Public outrage has also manifested through social media platforms, with many users expressing their concerns and disappointment in T-Mobile’s potential actions. The debate surrounding this issue has ignited discussions about the balance between national security, freedom of speech, and individual privacy rights.

SEO Optimization and Conclusion​

In conclusion, the news of T-Mobile’s consideration to monitor private text messages and issue fines for hate speech has sparked a heated debate on privacy and free speech. This development raises important questions about the trade-off between national security and individual privacy. As discussions continue, it is crucial for citizens and advocacy groups to remain vigilant and hold companies accountable for their actions.
.

BREAKING:
Major US Carrier T-Mobile considering software to monitor ALL private text messages of Citizens & hand out massive fines for those deemed Hate Speech.
Land of the Spied Upon & Home of the Sheep.
— The White Rabbit Podcast (@AllBiteNoBark8 December 26, 2023

Source

@AllBiteNoBark88 said BREAKING: Major US Carrier T-Mobile considering software to monitor ALL private text messages of Citizens & hand out massive fines for those deemed Hate Speech. Land of the Spied Upon & Home of the Sheep.

 

[AbyssGazer]

WhatsApp is owned and operated by Facebook.

If all you wanna do is write "fuck niggers" to grandma WhatsApp will do fine. They won't use the NSA backdoor for that. There are other messengers that are way safer, but less likely for normies to install.

 

[ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ]

T-Mobile Quietly Updates Its Terms to Fine Commercial Users for “Hate Speech” (Archive)​

Mobile communications giant T-Mobile has on the low updated its terms of service to include fines if content runs afoul of its perceived violations of “hate speech and profanities.”

For now at least – this applies to marketing texts (application to person, A2P – commercial and enterprise service), rather than individual consumers. For example, businesses and campaigns emailing you will be subjected to this type of scrutiny – not messages you send to friends and family.

The changes, however, do come just as the campaign for next year’s election is heating up in the US.

And people previously “burned” by this heat, and their opposition stance to the current US administration, are closely looking at development of this kind.

The story right now is that starting January 1, T-Mobile has new rules for such users it has decided violate its rules, and therefore, bandwidth.

The core of this policy is something – somewhat unfortunately, too – dubbed, SHAFT – Sex, Hate, Alcohol, Firearms, and Tobacco.

And, the point seems to be to police messages sent via T-Mobile that are seen as being in violation of either legal – or “moral” issues, as the company sees fit.

Now, there was originally confusion about what T-Mobile might quietly be up to. (As of right now, and for the time being) it is A2P traffic that might violate the top tier, “severity-0/Sev” = of the company’s violations rules.

And that means, different tiers of violations that start if you want to use the operator for phishing, smishing, or social engineering – all of which incur “direct harm to individual users” – that fine would be $2,000.

Then there’s tier 2: “$1,000, for illegal content (included content must be legal in all 50 states and federally).”

Then we – start – coming to SHAFT. $500, please, if you violate – but not limited to – cannabis, marijuana, CBD, illegal prescriptions, and solicitation. Also profanity and “hate speech.”

Apparently, companies such as T-Mobile think they have the right to start issuing fines to people now.

One thing to keep in mind about T-Mobile’ SHAFT (rules), though it’s not quite well defined – is that they are in keeping with the nebulous concept of rules that other tech/telecoms companies have been adopting as of late.

The question of how exactly that will be enforced (nevermind what it actually means) for the time remains unclear.

But there is clearly the intent to live up to a certain political/ideological standard currently in place in the US.