Science Programmer builds AI algorithm to ‘expose’ adult actresses - find out if you can watch your ex on pornhub, 100k found and counting

Yesterday, Yiqin Fu, a research associate at Yale University, tweeted a thread about a Chinese programmer who had claimed he had built an algorithm that had identified 100,000 adult actresses by cross-referencing footage from porn videos with social media profile pictures. Using this tool, they hope to help others check whether their girlfriends have ever acted in pornographic films.

A Germany-based Chinese programmer said he and some friends have identified 100k porn actresses from around the world, cross-referencing faces in porn videos with social media profile pictures. The goal is to help others check whether their girlfriends ever acted in those films. pic.twitter.com/TOuUBTqXOP



— Yiqin Fu (@yiqinfu) May 28, 2019

The facial recognition reportedly tool took half a year to build and has over 100 terabytes of video data pulled from sites including Pornhub, 91, 1024, sex8, and xvideos. This was compared against profile pictures from Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Weibo, and others.

When the software was first announced, it had around 1,000 comments — most expressing their excitement about the service with replies like “A true blessing for us credulous programmers,” “When can we use it?,” and “Wtf I love the tech future now.”

On the thread, Fu noted that the most up-voted comment asked if the OP plans on identifying the men in porn videos to which he replied how he’s open to the idea. But for legal reasons, he said he may have to “anonymize the data” before letting people query the database.

This isn’t the first time someone has used AI to identify faces in porn. In 2017, Pornhub announced that it was using machine learning and facial recognition to detect over 10,000 porn stars across the site in an effort to make it easier for users to find content they like. At the time, Motherboard argued the development was a privacy nightmare waiting to happen.

But unlike Pornhub, the intent here is much more ill-conceived. Porn stars often rely on pseudonyms to shield off their personal matters from their stage personas. From that perspective, cross-referencing porn videos with social media content could seriously endanger this boundary.

The programmer who built the tool was also asked whether he knew what sort of legal jeopardy he could be in. But claimed that everything was legal because he hasn’t shared any data or opened up the database to outside queries, and sex work is currently legal in Germany, where he’s based.

While this technology has the potential to find victims of human trafficking or other forms of sexual exploitations, that’s not the intent here. Rather, it’s a weapon for shaming women and stripping them of their privacy. One user on Fu’s thread tweeted how it won’t be long until people abuse this service to find porn stars that look similar to people they know in real life. That, combined with the sophistication of AI-generated ‘deepfake’ videos, proves the future is truly a horrific place to be a woman.



ULTRA HOT VICE TAKE ;

"Whether the Weibo user’s claims are trustworthy or not is beside the point, now that experts in feminist studies and machine learning have decried this project as algorithmically-targeted harassment. "

full story
DIY Facial Recognition for Porn Is a Dystopian Disaster
Someone is making dubious claims to have built a program for detecting faces in porn and cross-referencing against social media, with 100,000 identified so far.
by Samantha Cole
|
May 29 2019, 9:11am
  • facebook-square.svg
    SHARE
  • twitter.svg
    TWEET
Someone posting on Chinese social network Weibo claims to have used facial recognition to cross-reference women’s photos on social media with faces pulled from videos on adult platforms like Pornhub.

In a Monday post on Weibo, the user, who says he's based in Germany, claimed to have “successfully identified more than 100,000 young ladies” in the adult industry “on a global scale.”

To be clear, the user has posted no proof that he’s actually been able to do this, and hasn’t published any code, databases, or anything else besides an empty GitLab page to verify this is real. When Motherboard contacted the user over Weibo chat, he said they will release “database schema” and “technical details” next week, and did not comment further.

Still, his post has gone viral in both China on Weibo and in the United States on Twitter after a Stanford political science PhD candidate tweeted them with translations, which Motherboard independently verified. This has led prominent activists and academics to discuss the potential implications of the technology.

According to Weibo posts, the user and some of his programming friends used facial recognition to detect faces in porn content using photos from social platforms. His reasoning for making this program, he wrote, is “to have the right to know on both sides of the marriage.” After public outcry, he later claimed his intention was to allow women, with or without their fiancées, to check if they are on porn sites and to send a copyright takedown request.

"This is horrendous and a pitch-perfect example of how these systems, globally, enable male dominance," Soraya Chemaly, author of Rage Becomes Her, tweeted on Tuesday about the alleged project. "Surveillance, impersonation, extortion, misinformation all happen to women first and then move to the public sphere, where, once men are affected, it starts to get attention."



Whether the Weibo user’s claims are trustworthy or not is beside the point, now that experts in feminist studies and machine learning have decried this project as algorithmically-targeted harassment. This kind of program’s existence is both possible and frightening, and has started a conversation around whether such a program would be an ethically or legally responsible use of AI.

Just as we saw with deepfakes, which used AI to swap the faces of female celebrities onto the bodies of porn performers, the use of machine learning to control and extort women's bodily autonomy demonstrates deep misogyny. It's a threat that didn't begin with deepfakes, but certainly reached a public sphere with that technology—although in the years since, women have been left behind in the mainstream narrative, which has focused on the technology’s possible use for disinformation.

Danielle Citron, a professor of law at the University of Maryland who's studied the aftermath of deepfakes, also tweeted about this new claim on Weibo. "This is a painfully bad idea—surveillance and control of women’s bodies taken to new low," she wrote.

What he claims to have done is theoretically possible for someone with a decent amount of machine learning and programming knowledge, given enough time and computing power, though it would be a huge effort with no guarantee of quality.

The ability to create a database of faces like this, and deploy facial recognition to target and expose women within it, has been within consumer-level technological reach for some time.

In 2017, Pornhub proudly announced new facial recognition features that it claimed would make it easier for users to find their favorite stars—and, in turn, theoretically easier for abusers or harassers to find their targets. As I wrote at the time:

Even if Pornhub deploys this technology in an ethical way, its existence should be concerning. Such technology is unlikely to stay proprietary for long, and given that some people on the internet make a habit of identifying amateur or unwitting models, the underlying tech could supercharge some of these efforts.

In 2018, online trolls started compiling databases of sex workers, in order to threaten and out them. This harassment campaign had real-life consequences, with some sex workers having their payment processors or social media platforms shut down.

What this Weibo programmer is claiming to have built is a combination of these two ideas: A misogynistic, abusive attempt at controlling women. Whether it's real or not, it's representative of the dark paths where machine learning technology—and some of the societal toxicity around it—has taken us.
Jordan Pearson contributed reporting to this story.


original tweet that "broke" this story. The comments are a gold mine
777383


The arbyocalypse draws closer
 
When the SJWs complain about this, just remind them that freedom of porn doesn't mean freedom from consequences. Preferably after putting on your plastic pepe mask.

But you could apply this to literally anything and end up with the same level of argument.
"He was otherwise compatible but he was a diaper fetishist."
"She was otherwise compatible but she was a zoophile."
"He was otherwise compatible but he was the guy in 1 guy 1 jar."
People have deal-breakers for all kinds of non-sex issues too. He was otherwise compatible but he's a republican/democrat. She was otherwise compatible but she eats red meat. He drives a gas guzzler. She plays video games. He owns a gun. She believes in magic healing crystals. He has HIV and doesn't wear condoms, she is a man with a feminine penis. (the last two not valid reasons to not date someone in commiefornia). There's a ton of it. And it's okay for you to have any reason to not date someone. Anyone who tells you you're wrong is practicing rape culture against you. Unless you're in california, where I expect by early 2021 someone at a bar can hand you a victim ticket issued by the department of mental health services and you will face felony charges if you decline their demand for sex.
 
I'm late but...you could not watch all the pornography (that you would want to watch) if you dedicated your entire life to doing so. The amount of pornography that exists is more than adequate. There doesn't need to be anymore.
You can't possibly read (in your lifetime) all the books ever written, either. Guess we don't need any more books.
 
I'm late but...you could not watch all the pornography (that you would want to watch) if you dedicated your entire life to doing so. The amount of pornography that exists is more than adequate. There doesn't need to be anymore.
But there's only one about lemon stealing whores!
 
You're not actually making fun of them, though. You're not putting out anything witty or snarky you're just saying "I disagree with them!" and then expecting head pats.
No, no. When he imposes judgment, it's snark. When anyone snarks at him, it's judgment.
 
This must be the most pathetic use of computers to date. If you like someone enough that you would consider serious relationship with him/her, you're just and idiot to pass that because of something that person has done in the past. All in all, having "deal breakers" for the attributes of your partner is dumbest shit I've ever heard. If you love someone, like really love, then it should not matter one fucking inch what they've done in the past, unless it's some truly heinous shit like raping kids or something. Doing porn is quite normal, after all.
 

ULTRA HOT VICE TAKE ;

"Whether the Weibo user’s claims are trustworthy or not is beside the point, now that experts in feminist studies and machine learning have decried this project as algorithmically-targeted harassment. "

full story


original tweet that "broke" this story. The comments are a gold mine
View attachment 777383

The arbyocalypse draws closer

A Chinese citizen using an advanced AI algorithm for facial recognition in order to cross check peoples internet history to make sure that they've stuck to a socially acceptable moral standard.....
Well color me surprised, it's almost like this is not something I'd expect from the Chinese at all.

I don't really care about the porn film aspect of this.

Why people are surprised that these new technologies, such as facial recognition or replacement are coming out and people are using them for unexpected and often times negative reasons, is a mystery to me. Deepfakes, facial scans, etc. It's almost as if some people are just bad actors, and will use good technology for bad/selfish reasons.

At the same time, if these women publicly took dick for a living and were paid for it, (it is female empowerment after all) and allowed it to be released to the internet, then surely they can't complain when people recognise them, or judge them for it. Yes they're allowed their privacy, but not their anonymity. That's sadly part and parcel of living in an age where every one's dumb decisions can be documented for future use against them.
 
To be of any use, it should link you to specific clips to watch and verify firsthand. Whoever dumps his girlfriend over an abstract false positive deserves to stay a virgin, and the woman is better off not building a family with that person.

The problem with copyrighted songs is not the search itself, it's enforcement that privileges the claimant (automated or not).

You are right about the enforcement but that's why the only thing you can do is step back and grin while the red pillers and the feminists catfight over this shit. They both think they're right and they are both too retarded to back down, and they won't learn until someone else brutalizes them in this fashion. The question about how deepfakes will interact with this is a good one. Revenge porn and illegal recording of sex tapes is one thing, who knows what'll happen once people start deepfaking randos into porn just to blow up marriages because grown adults are so retarded they actually want a Carfax report on each other's genitalia.

I suppose the best teacher is still the hot stove. The chink may not be releasing the software for his Beijing masters now but it will come to market sooner or later and then it'll be a shitshow of people falling for photoshops. Porn stars don't really get married or do stable relationships so I doubt they'll be impacted. But genuine relationships will once the dab hands realize they can blow up relationships with this.

So you know, it'll be funny as fuck seeing people getting dumped and divorced left and right because their spouses are re.tarded and believe everything they see on the internet.

I swear to christ chinks could crap into a bowl and people would eat it with a spoon if they were told "this will totally own your political enemies."

e: the slap fight that's taken over this thread is extremely gay and all the users involved should commit suicide for being mental midgets.
 
Doing porn is quite normal, after all.
I think you live in a bubble where sexual topics are way more freely discussed/explored, because no, to the average person, a partner doing porn is not at ALL normal. Even with the rise of amateur content it's still a tiny tiny subset of the overall population confident enough to film themselves in the act.
 
If you like someone enough that you would consider serious relationship with him/her, you're just and idiot to pass that because of something that person has done in the past. All in all, having "deal breakers" for the attributes of your partner is dumbest shit I've ever heard. If you love someone, like really love, then it should not matter one fucking inch what they've done in the past, unless it's some truly heinous shit like raping kids or something.

If you "love" someone so much you don't allow yourself to care about any aspect of their past, their personality, their situation, their habits, their capabilities, or their prospects... then you are not "in love", you are infatuated or obsessed.

A person is not an idealized abstract. They are concrete, unique beings with a million characteristics, needs, and preferences. When you add their positive/negative characteristics up, if someone doesn't satisfy your needs and preferences, at least at a bare minimum, then "love" isn't going to make you happy.

Real people have real desires, and pretending that an idealized love is more important than reality is a recipe for disastrous disillusionment.

Doing porn is quite normal, after all.

There's a serious disconnect somewhere between what you consider normal, and the actual normal people who inhabit the offline real world.
 
Small bit of background here for people unaware of the potential cultural context.

In China, infidelity is incredibly, incredibly common. To the point that business trips often have budgets that include hiring prostitutes. Many married men have mistresses, and married women are often highly possessive of their men for that very reason. This is why you shouldn't date (native) Chinese women unless you are absolutely certain you want to marry them. They'll take it seriously, and they will likely stalk you obsessively just to make sure you aren't sleeping around. This behavior is honestly pretty understandable given how frequently their trust is abused, and how casually infidelity is treated in China by men. There are a great deal of videos floating around out there of wives beating up prostitutes they've found their men with in broad daylight.

So basically, in this kind of context, a program like this becomes extremely handy, especially in the zero-privacy world of China. It'd make it very easy to spot mistresses and prostitutes, especially the 'professional' kind that a businessman is likely to have. For that reason I'm pretty okay with it. Don't expose yourself online, kids.
 
If you "love" someone so much you don't allow yourself to care about any aspect of their past, their personality, their situation, their habits, their capabilities, or their prospects... then you are not "in love", you are infatuated or obsessed.

A person is not an idealized abstract. They are concrete, unique beings with a million characteristics, needs, and preferences. When you add their positive/negative characteristics up, if someone doesn't satisfy your needs and preferences, at least at a bare minimum, then "love" isn't going to make you happy.

Real people have real desires, and pretending that an idealized love is more important than reality is a recipe for disastrous disillusionment.



There's a serious disconnect somewhere between what you consider normal, and the actual normal people who inhabit the offline real world.


See, if you are capable of that level of rationalization about someone else, then you're not in love. Love, to me, and to most people I've talked about it, means accepting someone as they are, whatever that something might be. Of course, there are things which are so heinous that getting to ever love someone who has committed such acts isn't most likely possible - but it's quite childish to say that doing porn could be one of them, as it's mostly harmless as long as people participating are doing it on their free will. Only real reason I see behind this topic we are having is insecurity, which is just pathetic.

By normal I mean normal relative to "what's not normal". It's not normal, or acceptable to sexually abuse someone. In contrast, doing porn with consenting adults is totally normal.
 
If you love someone, like really love, then it should not matter one fucking inch what they've done in the past, unless it's some truly heinous shit like raping kids or something. Doing porn is quite normal, after all.

So what if they had lied and said they were doing porn the whole time you were with them? If you truly love them it shouldn't matter. What if they also made some money on the side as a prostitute? It shouldn't matter because it's true love.

princess-bride-twue-wuv.jpg
 
So what if they had lied and said they were doing porn the whole time you were with them? If you truly love them it shouldn't matter. What if they also made some money on the side as a prostitute? It shouldn't matter because it's true love.

View attachment 779111


Some people probably would forgive such, although I personally believe I couldn't. In the past I knew this guy who did porn, and his wife was completely okay with it although she had completely "normal" job and wasn't at all involved with porn, so I guess some people do love each other to the point of accepting even that. Still, there was no lies attached to that relationship, as the woman knew everything all the time.

My original point was simply that love, as an emotion, should be unconditional. Otherwise it's not true love, and you shouldn't choose to live with someone based on something less than true love.
 
Some people probably would forgive such, although I personally believe I couldn't. In the past I knew this guy who did porn, and his wife was completely okay with it although she had completely "normal" job and wasn't at all involved with porn, so I guess some people do love each other to the point of accepting even that. Still, there was no lies attached to that relationship, as the woman knew everything all the time.

My original point was simply that love, as an emotion, should be unconditional. Otherwise it's not true love, and you shouldn't choose to live with someone based on something less than true love.
You sure you're old enough to be posting here? :(
 
Some people probably would forgive such, although I personally believe I couldn't. In the past I knew this guy who did porn, and his wife was completely okay with it although she had completely "normal" job and wasn't at all involved with porn, so I guess some people do love each other to the point of accepting even that. Still, there was no lies attached to that relationship, as the woman knew everything all the time.

My original point was simply that love, as an emotion, should be unconditional. Otherwise it's not true love, and you shouldn't choose to live with someone based on something less than true love.

This nigga sounds like a pathetic nerd in an anime
 
I also feel like if your S/O did porn it may be important to you what kind of porn they did.

Did they kiss another girl gently and lovingly while soft music played?

Or were they dressed as a 6 year old girl (complete with Diaper/pacifier/pigtails) screaming about what a whore they are while 4 black dudes take turns on her with scalding her with a fire iron.

Not all porn is the same, after all.

What if a guy finds out his girlfriend has done really, really racist porn. Calling the black guy nigger and smacking him around, wearing a dixie bikini and a Cowboy's hat.
No one in this thread have entertained the thought of happy endings where two people grow closer due to the things this human flesh search engine can find and reveal about their partner.

This must be the most pathetic use of computers to date. If you like someone enough that you would consider serious relationship with him/her, you're just and idiot to pass that because of something that person has done in the past. All in all, having "deal breakers" for the attributes of your partner is dumbest shit I've ever heard. If you love someone, like really love, then it should not matter one fucking inch what they've done in the past, unless it's some truly heinous shit like raping kids or something. Doing porn is quite normal, after all.

That's why so many serial killers get lady callers in prison, they love them and don't care about what they've done, even if what they've done was raping and murdering women. It's maybe not the best example of true love.
 
Back