(why does archive.is use light mode??)
Because it is better. Turn on the light in your room nigga.
Found this reply and was curious what
uv was.
An extremely fast Python package and project manager, written in Rust.
Highlights
A single tool to replace pip, pip-tools, pipx, poetry, pyenv, twine, virtualenv, and more.
️ 10-100x faster than pip.
Provides comprehensive project management, with a universal lockfile.
Runs scripts, with support for inline dependency metadata.
Installs and manages Python versions.
Runs and installs tools published as Python packages.
Includes a pip-compatible interface for a performance boost with a familiar CLI.
Supports Cargo-style workspaces for scalable projects.
Disk-space efficient, with a global cache for dependency deduplication.
Installable without Rust or Python via curl or pip.
Supports macOS, Linux, and Windows.
uv is backed by Astral, the creators of Ruff.
How did things get this bad, fellas?
app.use((req, res, next) => {
let d = new Date();
console.log(`${req.method} - ${req.path} :: ${req.ip} - at ${d}`);
next();
});
How many Python package managers are there now? Eight? And they all suck in different ways.
use strict and use warnings necessary to enable proper error messages (which IME are still not very good)Data::Dumper required for this functionalityList::Util required for more basic stuffTry::Tiny or other such external library required for exception handlingSet::Scalar and other implementations are out there
Saw this on le Reddit:
That's a really baffling comment from someone who apparently has some awareness of the Python ecosystem as it exists today.
>be le me
The author made favorable comments about Julia, which I have yet to use, and R, especially the Tidyverse. I agree entirely that R and its ecosystem can be very useful and still exceed Python in certain respects but the R language itself is pretty janky.
Once you have exposure to some other options you might end up looking at JS like I was looking at Perl earlier.
'use strict' is also in JS for a reason.
Depends what you mean by "as much". Turing-completeness means the sky (and computation time) is the limit.
Yeah. I did spend some time messing around with C# and I fully intend to get into lower level compiled languages like C++. But most of my effort is focused on html, css, and javascript because I'm trying to get steady work in web development.
css is Turing complete.
So is 3 registers and stack of if's. It seems that creating turing complete language is easier than it is not.
Julia is a fantastic language btw, very nice, consistent, fundamentally functional, and fast, with a nice type system while staying familiar to anyone who has done a bit of Python. It's originally implemented on top of Scheme of all things, and IIRC you can access the underlying sexpr representation so you can do heavy metaprogramming. The ecosystem is not quite there yet but they have already implemented an impressive amount of things you would find for Python. Bonus points for having a good package manager out of the box
and?
If my choices were still either just Perl or one or more of C,
$SHELL, sed and awk I would absolutely be writing tons of Perl today. I've fixed ./configure scripts by hand before. Shell (which IIRC used Perl to do some heavy lifting in those scripts) is an abomination in comparison.