Programming thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
it wouldnt work since you cant really make the row bigger in neovim as far as i know unless you turn on column wrapping but ehhhhhhhhhhhhh that would be very hack-y and wouldnt look good
ah fair, I was working off the old method for terminal interfaces where you more or less do this.

clear screen
draw
clear screen
repeat.
 
ah fair, I was working off the old method for terminal interfaces where you more or less do this.

clear screen
draw
clear screen
repeat.
i mean there technically is image.nvim with 3 ways to display images
1. kitty's terminal graphics protocol which only works in the kitty terminal (i.e. not on windows)
2. ueberzug which is also linux only and i dont know anything about it but apparently works on every terminal
3. sixel which does work on windows but i have no idea if it would extend rows or it would be strictly for viewing individual images (its also utterly slow apparently)
 
I wanted to write a rebuttal to the fat guy but I couldn't come up with anything good because his arguments are so retarded. I like data-oriented, it's a nice tool to use and to think about problems. It's not a magic bullet. Being honest, the only reason any of that matters is because imperative programming is an ungodly mistake invented by a crazed homosexual that is just a smidgen more convenient to emulate with electronics when in a sane timeline we would have lisp machines and Holy-Scheme rather than Holy-C.

Bruh. If I knew how to program in Lisp, do you really think I'd be here trying to teach 20+ year web "devs" what a socket is, or senior C++ programmers how to manage memory?

No, I'd be on a yacht full of supermodels because I would have taken over the Universe.

I'm just intelligent enough to know how powerful Lisp is, and just retarded enough to not wield it's power.
 
Back
Top Bottom