Prostasia Foundation - Tax-exempt paedophile advocacy charity with an open forum; wants an end to sex offender registries; has had several sex offenders working for them; finances a "MAP" support club kids are allowed to join; legalize child sex dolls you bigot

Reduxx has learned that a researcher at McGill University in Canada has been conducting a survey aimed at gaining insight from “child lovers” in online pedophile communities. The survey features images of naked children.
I'd say throw this pervert in prison for distribution of CP but then I noticed Canada.

Yeah.
 
If they are medical images and photos, like the type you see in textbooks, and are being used for "legitimate" research purposes, this probably wouldn't count as CP.
If you're providing them to pedophiles with the knowledge of what they're going to be used for, I think that's considerably more gray. I don't remember there being an "I was doing RESEARCH, yeah, that's the ticket" exception.
 
Does "Prostasia" mean anything or did they just feel directly calling it "We Want to Rape Kids Foundation" was a little too on the nose?
 
If you're providing them to pedophiles with the knowledge of what they're going to be used for, I think that's considerably more gray. I don't remember there being an "I was doing RESEARCH, yeah, that's the ticket" exception.

Yeah isn't this kinda the whole reason there has been a move from categorizing pedo material as CP to instead CSAM meaning "child sexual assault material"? To take into account the context of how stuff that isn't technically porn is being used to nonce kids?

Also from quick research Stasia is a girl's name from greek that is used to mean "protection" and such and they do say shit like that on their about page. I am guessing it is a play on their whole "it's REAL LOVE guys love is love age is just a number the child consents" schtick.
 
Also from quick research Stasia is a girl's name from greek that is used to mean "protection" and such and they do say shit like that on their about page. I am guessing it is a play on their whole "it's REAL LOVE guys love is love age is just a number the child consents" schtick.
That sounds like a good guess and is easily creepy as fuck enough to come from the mind of one of these sick freaks.

I always thought it reminded me of prostitution/Asia to go with their whole sex trafficking theme.
 
Also from quick research Stasia is a girl's name from greek that is used to mean "protection" and such and they do say shit like that on their about page. I am guessing it is a play on their whole "it's REAL LOVE guys love is love age is just a number the child consents" schtick.
The background to the name is covered in the OP, but you’re basically right:
The name Prostasia is taken from the Greek word ‘προστασία’, meaning Protection. Ah yes, Greek culture. Very fitting inspiration. (okay that was low hanging fruit lol sorry)
I remember the days when I thought it was a prostate cancer research foundation. Those were good times.
 
A foum discussion on "white privelege" opens with a banger!
hmletmelook.png
What was it?
oklol.png
B..B.B.B.B.BASED?!?!? Nevermind you're probably a pedophile.
so much delusion.png
LINK / A

This thread is just kinda retarded. Firstly, who hid this shit? It's true. Island is making a good point. Secondly, Larry says his Dad had to change religions to avoid antisemitism, where's my white privilege. Which based but, I'm assuming he's European because that level of antisemitism is not here in the US, so it is 100% ethnic. Cue the (((White))) jokes.

Limited options for viewers​

When it comes to individuals who view CSAM, there is a substantial disparity between public perceptions and existing research. For example, although less than 10% of child pornography offenders return to viewing illegal material after being convicted, a sample of the general public predicted that this value would be 74%, over seven times the real percentage. The public also significantly overestimated the rate at which CSAM viewers directly abuse children, predicting that 63% of viewers would go on to have sexual contact with a child, 21 times the actual value of 3%. These misperceptions drove support for punitive measures, such as incarceration and sex offender registration, and opposition to non-carceral alternatives. In other words, some of the support for our carceral system results from misconceptions about the risks posed by child pornography offenders.
I didn’t look for professional help because I thought I would get arrested straight away. Plus I had no money to afford it and I don’t think online counseling was even a thing back then.
Alex, former CSAM viewer
Regardless of its origins, the desire to punish people who view CSAM is understandable. After all, their actions directly contribute to the revictimization of a CSA survivor. Nevertheless, like many other elements of a carceral approach, punitive measures may increase the rate at which people view and share CSAM. According to a survey of dark web CSAM viewers, 62% of those searching for illegal content involving children tried to stop viewing such content at least once. However, the same study found that only 3% of viewers received help to stop, while 33% wanted to seek help but were afraid to do so or unable to find support. In many regions, mandatory reporting laws make it impossible for CSAM viewers to disclose their actions to a mental health professional without being reported to law enforcement. Faced with the threat of imprisonment and registration as a sex offender, many CSAM viewers who want to stop choose not to seek support, likely causing them to continue viewing harmful content.
LINK / A

This comes from an article proposing we don't prosecute CP, and instead we just get them help :) but that's not how the real world works. The title of this section is funny as fuck, "Limited options for viewers" are you complaining that the viewers can't get help or that there isn't enough content? I looked up the law for the mandatory reporting, it's a difficult subject honestly, and it should be handled by anyone BUT pedophiles.

The survey they link is a google drive link so access it through incognito, but it's one of the most disturbing reads. 33% wanted to seek help? There's an entire section of people who said they don't need help. 48% of people who took the essay (who speak english) say they don't need help. The reasons are delusional and kinda sad, and the shit these people admit to watching horrifies me. 4-13 year old girls LIVESTREAMED, FUCKING LIVESTREAMED. LOBOTOMIZE THESE FAGGOTS. The section of people who want help is big but not nearly enough.

How do we know they didn't just, lie? The Hani Miletski study is one on zoophiles who claimed that one of the worst people named "Isaac" was getting help. Isaac is actually Tim Win, and the study was made in 2002, he continued his abuse for fucking years.

Prostasia, you are not a warrior for sexual liberation, free speech, or the protection of children. You are masked in this delusion and it pains me to see real groups who fight for children unknowingly support your facade of a movement.
 
This is crazy.

Noah Berlatsky is writing for Bloomberg on how the trafficking movie doesn't have QAnon content in it, but it has ... err ... tropes and those are bad too.

(paywall) https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...f-freedom-both-rely-on-tired-hollywood-tropes
So they literally hire an open pedophile to write an article about how child trafficking not only doesn't exist but is pretty cool anyway because he likes a steady supply of children.
This comes from an article proposing we don't prosecute CP, and instead we just get them help :) but that's not how the real world works.
I don't know, this reasoning could work. After all, let's just decriminalize killing pedophiles. If someone because of their obvious mental issues murders a bunch of pedophiles, let's just get them help, maybe buy them a house, or give them a medal to make them feel better, or something.
 
Berlatsky is probably the best example i can think of of a useful idiot.
It's clear to see why Bloomberg would publish an article by him. It's critical of a movie about child abductions, calling the fans of said movie conspiracy theorists (idk if this is true or not I'm not American idgaf) yet he's the one part of a pedophile organisation.
There's not a single person alive who would read Noah's article and be convinced, it just serves to give more fuel to a reactionary fire. Look at how much engagement the article got compared to other shit Bloomberg posts:
724.jpg5928.jpg

Rage sells. I wonder if Noah even knows he's being used? It's so cynical on the media's part, causing even further rifts in the social fabric for a few more clicks. I doubt Noah gets his role in it, this is a man who has such a fucking child's world view on power structures that he'd make Kropotkin decide to become a fascist instead out of shame

50ffb86f56c456dc82ac0e.png

It's neat to see just how much he's poisoned his own reputation by associating with prostasia. Just search his name on twitter, and that's all people are talking about. there's a lot to hate him for, but this is far and above the sole thing people mention about him. it's hillarious. While searching twitter I found a really horrible video of him dancing. I decided to add my own music. I think he'd like my song choice

 
Last edited:
Random question that popped in my head: do you think these vermin seethe at the existence of Interpol's 'Trace an Object' page? For those who don't know, it's a page where feds put things cut out from CP in the hopes that people can ID their origin and narrow down a location.
 
Random question that popped in my head: do you think these vermin seethe at the existence of Interpol's 'Trace an Object' page? For those who don't know, it's a page where feds put things cut out from CP in the hopes that people can ID their origin and narrow down a location.
really surprised that Jeremy Malcom hasn't already written a scare piece about how things like this are ACTUALLY orwelian surveilance measures that fail to protect children and actually harm innocent people (mostly Black and Brown bodies, amen) who may-or-may not be minor attracted, which i might add is a a valid sexual orientation.
after all, this is almost verbatim what he and his cronies have said to argue against sex offender registries. not such a huge leap in logic
 
Random question that popped in my head: do you think these vermin seethe at the existence of Interpol's 'Trace an Object' page? For those who don't know, it's a page where feds put things cut out from CP in the hopes that people can ID their origin and narrow down a location.

...I had never heard of this before. That sounds like a genius way to crowdsource help to stop criminals while not revealing private data on possible investigations.

I wonder how well it works.
 
thought about checking in on Don Delano's twitter. While he hasn't posted anything in ages, he's still liking shit. some uh interesting shit
1689862070551.png
oh and also this, from before i made the thread, which i somehow missed
1689862126637.png
there's a lot more but this was the funniest stuff i saw
 
thought about checking in on Don Delano's twitter. While he hasn't posted anything in ages, he's still liking shit. some uh interesting shit
View attachment 5222514
oh and also this, from before i made the thread, which i somehow missed
there's a lot more but this was the funniest stuff i saw
Is foot fetishism correlated with pedophilia?
Even if it's not officially, I will file that factoid away.
 
Back
Top Bottom