Feedback Put Q&A on its own, seperate "New Sperging" list and seperating Articles from "New Politisperging"

[Hellwalker]

In recent times, there's been not one but two threads made by the powers that be addressing the more spammy, retarded posts made in General Discussion. While the spamming on General Discussion is gone now, I think the most satisfactory solution is to give the Q&A regulars (The people who usually made those spammy threads) a list the same as "New Sperging" but for new Q&A threads created. This will give the Q&A tards a place to see new retarded thread questions they can shitpost in which means there would be no reason to make such threads that'll clog up New Sperging (Which it looked like it use to do when it was apart of New Sperging, from my experience in archives).

I also believe that all Articles & News threads should be seperated from New Politisperging into its own update list, much like with Q&A. While Articles are very important to the Thunderdome, I think having them combined with new Mass Debate and Deep Thoughts doesn't allow for those threads to have room to breathe and they can be booted off New Politisperging very quickly when enough Article threads get made.

These lists can go where the empty space under Forum Statistics is which @Epic Fail Man pointed out in the first "General Discussion is not spam board" thread.

 

[Null]

why not just remove the board from that list, who cares about new threads in Q&A

 

[Diggus Bickus]

why not just remove the board from that list, who cares about new threads in Q&A

Because who made this thread might be a Q&A frequenter to begin with. Altho I have to agree, it's getting a bit annoying to scroll down and get a flood off "IS NULL'S PENIS SMALL???????????????" spam threads overshadowing the good ones on the list

 

[mindlessobserver]

Because who made this thread might be a Q&A frequenter to begin with. Altho I have to agree, it's getting a bit annoying to scroll down and get a flood off "IS NULL'S PENIS SMALL???????????????" spam threads overshadowing the good ones on the list

Who the fuck frequents Q&A? How embarrassing.

 

[Diggus Bickus]

Who the fuck frequents Q&A? How embarrassing.

You could ask the same question about the DSP board yet you see 25% of the forum's userbase only frequent it. Anything's possible at this rate.

 

[Hellwalker]

why not just remove the board from that list

Are you referring to Articles & News being removed from New Politsperging? If so, then I don't really think that'll work. Articles being there has worked really well so far and the Article format is pretty much perfect for being perpetually updated on a list. I just think them being combined with Mass Debates and Deep Thoughts threads is not a good design since the frequency of which they are made means they outshine any potential thread in those two respective boards.

who cares about new threads in Q&A

I can't speak for others in terms of enjoyment when spammy threads were still made in General Discussion, but the main amusment of them for me was seeing them there to begin with. It was funny seeing retarded threads being made that I can instantly shitpost in. I think having new Q&A threads on a list to see which ever one tickles their shitposting bone could work.

 

[Skitarii]

The UI clutter will continue until morale improves

 

[Bloitzhole]

On a gossip forum about weirdos on the internet, the autistic sperging should be front and center.
Having two separate lists solely for the barely distinguishable /pol/tard leper colonies is nonsense, I'd rather see "New Gurltalk" and "DSPnews" (which would of course be empty 99.9% of the time) than the 14th incel/wignat ragebait article of the week.
In fact, replace "New Politsperging" entirely with a box that just plays random rotating clips of BMJ losing it all.

 

[karz]

/qa/chuds won

 

[Mound Dweller]

I could not give less of a toss about QnegroAssholetards it's pure unfunny crap generation and the less I am reminded of it the better, please minimise.

 

[BradeRunna]

Shit posting is fun.