RU Putin’s loyalists have set their sights on Alaska, making threats to grab the territory back from America - Ancient schizo wants alaska back

Putin’s loyalists have set their sights on Alaska, making threats to grab the territory back from America​


Vladimir Putin’s loyalists have set their sights on Alaska, making threats to grab the territory back from America.

The threats are in response to calls for Western nations to sell Russian assets as punishment for the war in Ukraine.

The US purchased Alaska from Tsar Alexander II in 1867 for $7.2 million, and it became a state in 1959.

Now, Russia’s most senior parliamentarian Vyacheslav Volodin has warned that nation could claim the territory back.


‘Decency is not weakness,’ said the speaker of the State Duma, Russia’s lower house of parliament.

‘We always have something to answer with.

‘Let America always remember, there is part of its territory… Alaska.’

‘When they start trying to dispose of our resources abroad, let them think before they do so that we also have something to get back.’

He ordered other MPs to ‘keep an eye on Alaska’.

Putin's ally threatens to take back Alaska in response to US sanctions

The calls come after Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky urged the West to sell Russian assets to pay for the recovery of Ukraine’s war-ravaged economy.

‘We are not interfering in their internal affairs, but they have been saying for decades that everything that is happening with them, the elections of all presidents, all that is because Russia is interfering,’ Mr Volodin added.

Another MP Pyotr Tolstoy, the great-great-grandson of writer Leo Tolstoy and deputy speaker of the Kremlin-obedient parliament, has proposed holding a referendum on Alaska.

A similar tactic was carried out in Crimea under the purview of the Russian military, resulting in a majority for joining Russia.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on February 24, triggered the most serious crisis in relations between Russia and the West since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.

After failing to seize the capital Kyiv early on in the invasion the Kremlin has since focussed its efforts on waging a war of attrition for Ukraine’s Donbas region, parts of which are controlled by Russian separatist proxies.

On Sunday, Putin claimed his biggest victory when Ukrainian forces withdrew from Luhansk province.

Russian forces then launched an offensive to take neighbouring Donetsk province. Donetsk and Luhansk comprise the Donbas.

Russia says it wants to wrest control of the eastern and heavily industrial region on behalf of Moscow-backed separatists in two self-proclaimed people’s republics.
 
Don't make me defend the ruskies here, but what makes you think they aren't winning in Ukraine? Cause the media keeps lying about them? Then somehow, a few days later they capture more and more cities? How can they be deliriously incompetent to lose to Ukraine and yet still be winning? It's typical bullshit to make you want to root for the "underdog" in the fight.
This has been a very costly war for Russia. I think they will win in Ukraine just due to sheer material advantage but it will be a costly Pyrrhic victory that will burden the country for years to come.

People forget Russia's economy is in terrible shape and even though these sanctions have been highly ineffective at, well, anything really they are still taking an enormous loss selling their oil at a discount. They are basically a Third World resource exporting nation with a modern military funded by those exports.

Upper Volta with missiles as the Soviets used to be called in the latter part of the 1970s. No different today.
 
Don't make me defend the ruskies here, but what makes you think they aren't winning in Ukraine? Cause the media keeps lying about them? Then somehow, a few days later they capture more and more cities? How can they be deliriously incompetent to lose to Ukraine and yet still be winning? It's typical bullshit to make you want to root for the "underdog" in the fight.
They're winning, sure.

It's like retards fighting, only ones slightly bigger and has tard friends.

They'll get chewed up against anyone with a half way decent military.

modern military
LOL
 
Oh well, I don't give a shit if they take Ukraine. I just think it's funny people buy into the propaganda that the Ukraine even stands a chance. We pump them up with billions of dollars of munitions and aid and they are still losing to a shit military. Let that sink in.
 
Oh well, I don't give a shit if they take Ukraine. I just think it's funny people buy into the propaganda that the Ukraine even stands a chance. We pump them up with billions of dollars of munitions and aid and they are still losing to a shit military. Let that sink in.
I think it's hilarious how Biden uses to say "WE'RE AT WAR!" like we have deployed assets.

It's also hilarious how much of the weapons given to Ukraine end up on the black market.

It's also fucking funny as shit to see GWOT vets going over, thinking it'll be like their adventures against mudders, only to be fucking blown the fuck out by a 10 second artillery barrage and running away crying.

The whole thing is fucking hilarious.
 
If I gave away Alaska for 7 million dollars, I'd have sellers remorse too. No wonder they want take-backsies.
You're implying they would've put it to a good use. Look at Siberia, millions of square kilometers with plenty of natural resources, all barely developed with deteriorating infrastructure. Alaska would be the same by now had the sale not happened.
 
This has been a very costly war for Russia. I think they will win in Ukraine just due to sheer material advantage but it will be a costly Pyrrhic victory that will burden the country for years to come.

People forget Russia's economy is in terrible shape and even though these sanctions have been highly ineffective at, well, anything really they are still taking an enormous loss selling their oil at a discount. They are basically a Third World resource exporting nation with a modern military funded by those exports.

Upper Volta with missiles as the Soviets used to be called in the latter part of the 1970s. No different today.
From what I see, Russia has largely secured some territory in Ukraine's southeast, enough to claim a measure of victory. Ukraine will keep pushing back and launching attacks into Russia. Russia will push back and we'll have another 2014-type situation, lasting years and hurting both countries. In the long run, believe this hurts Russia more. Ukraine will get foreign help to rebuild and strengthen their military. Russia will still be dealing with sanctions on some level.
 
Way back when, there were Russian settlements in CA.

On another subject, how would the Russians invade? We have enough forces in Alaska to defeat what little Putin could scrape together.
If they held a referendum (somehow) and the majority votes to go vatnik then they technically wouldn't be invading, they'd be invited by the residents of Alaska. If they simultaneously do the same in Texas but just help them leave it would be a clusterfuck given the current state of our armed forces.
1657205541995.png
Considering the Great Reset queer agenda on people may just want a change in overlords and don't want to worry if their kids are being trooned out in second grade.
 
From what I see, Russia has largely secured some territory in Ukraine's southeast, enough to claim a measure of victory. Ukraine will keep pushing back and launching attacks into Russia. Russia will push back and we'll have another 2014-type situation, lasting years and hurting both countries. In the long run, believe this hurts Russia more. Ukraine will get foreign help to rebuild and strengthen their military. Russia will still be dealing with sanctions on some level.
That's what I see too. One big issue is that unless there is some way to secure these areas and their border Russia they will have endless problems with partisans; the LPR and DPR should be completely safe but outside of that they are operating in much more hostile territory. Ukranians just plain don't want to be part of Russia, their history with that nation over the past 100 years or so has been extremely negative just like Poland.

Another problem is it will be basically impossible to convince anyone of the legitimacy of annexation should they pursue that path. Crimea was a lot different because it was always considered part of Russia and only transferred to Ukraine in the 1950s because Nikita Khrushchev had a deep personal like for the region and its people.
 
You're implying they would've put it to a good use. Look at Siberia, millions of square kilometers with plenty of natural resources, all barely developed with deteriorating infrastructure. Alaska would be the same by now had the sale not happened.
Russians did a great job with deforestation and polluting lake Baikal. It's a shame SIberia is tied to out of touch tards from places like Moscow where they produce nothing and mismanage the rest of the country from their bubble.
 
Crimea was a lot different because it was always considered part of Russia and only transferred to Ukraine in the 1950s because Nikita Khrushchev had a deep personal like for the region and its people.
Crimea first become part of Russia only in late 18th century. If you consider that Crimea is Ukraine's since 1950's then Russia owned it for something like 175 years. Kiev has ruled over Crimea for like 300 years, and apart from them the place belonged to, at various times, the Greeks, Byzantines, Mongols, Timurids, and Italians.
 
what's with all the OO-RAH COMMIES GET MURKED talk in this thread lmao. this is a dumb combination of political stunting by one rando in the Russian government, and dumb ass media sensationalism. the entire story is that one dude in Russian parliament was like xaxa american so dumb why not we take back alaskya cyka blyadj and this fucking UK news outlet is printing a headline about it that says PUTIN'S EVIL GOVERNMENT MINIONS DISCUSS PLANS TO INVADE ALASKA!!!!!!!! if that's got you bouncing in your posting chair and screaming ΜΟΛΏΝ ΛΑΒΈ maybe you ought to take a break from A&N for a bit and Caress Vegetation
 
Crimea first become part of Russia only in late 18th century. If you consider that Crimea is Ukraine's since 1950's then Russia owned it for something like 175 years. Kiev has ruled over Crimea for like 300 years, and apart from them the place belonged to, at various times, the Greeks, Byzantines, Mongols, Timurids, and Italians.
It should've returned to the Italians. It's the least we could've done, after cheating them out of the promised post-war territories from WWI.
 
You're implying they would've put it to a good use. Look at Siberia, millions of square kilometers with plenty of natural resources, all barely developed with deteriorating infrastructure. Alaska would be the same by now had the sale not happened.

Years ago in an attempt to get a better understanding of the Ivan's I would occasionally interact with online I started using google translate to search certain topics in Russian, mostly on Youtube.

Alaska drew out the extreme ends of either side of the pro and anti government Russian political spectrum, the pro's seething like the duma members in this article and the anti's lamenting how much better developed Alaska is compered to the Russian far east.
 
Back