Putting restrictions on big-tech is a stupid idea

ICametoLurk said:
That's the central contradiction of our age, I think. It's a contradiction between the (subjective) interests of certain formations within the superstructure – angry white yokels of a conventionally Christian background – and the (objective) requirements of the base. Objectively, as far as the market is concerned, there's no reason why angry white yokels should be treated any differently from the Vietnamese lady in the nail salon. The tendency of the first world is re-proletarianization . The downturn in employment in manufacturing is partially due to automation, not just drops in output. Resources for use in renewed production, it follows that it will probably re-industrialize, as it (and all Western countries) are pursuing "isolationism." So right-wing "populism," such as it is, elects to threaten the economic base with the aim of shoring up their social / political position in their societies.

An analogy would be a contradiction between the goose and the golden eggs. The goose isn't laying as many golden eggs these days so the farmer opts to try and strangle the goose to death.
Click to expand...
Shut up, gaybo.
 
Y2KKK Baby said:
  • New industry.
  • Massive monopoly forms.
  • Create massive restrictions.
  • Effectively kill the previous market cycle and freeze the power structure.
  • The Rockerfellers, Morgans, Rothschilds, Du-Ponts will never not be rich again.

Why would it be any different.
Click to expand...
Ah, you have some of that pretty backwards. The massive monopoly kills the market cycle and freezes the power structure. That's exactly the point of a monopoly. The rockerfellers got rich BECAUSE of their monopoly.

Ideally, the restrictions break up the harmful monopoly without adding undue burdens, but you're right that those burdens often harm smaller businesses and startups more than the established players, especially when the established players get a part in forming those regulations. But that's only because they're so established, because they have a monopoly in the first place!

raymond said:
I don't care what you like because your kind will be erased off the internet soon and I can sleep soundly knowing that you were literally asking for it.
Click to expand...
Awwww man, look at this dipshit going full retard. Full authoritarian retard at that.

If I were the owner of Kiwi Farms, I would ban this dude based on this comment, for the irony value. But then, the real owner of Kiwi Farms would probably rather ban me, so, you're probably safe for now, @raymond ... Safe and gay, with your tiny PenOr. I am annoyed that image is cut off, my lowbrow dick joke was wasted.

Edit: Doublepost cleanup
 
Last edited:
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Y2K Baby
Corbin Dallas Multipass said:
If you have ever made a post like this, you are dumb and/or autistic.


If you have ever made a post like this, your ideas are not as obvious as you think they are. Also, they're probably autistic and dumb.
Click to expand...
You are autistic and dumb, lol.







Lol.
 
Googles parent company has to be broken down, they have their fingers in everything and hinder the free market in that way.

and there need to be some regulation aimed against some of apples business practices since they are realy shady and anticonsumer.

facebook and co are not a problem in my eyes, they have a large marketshare, but thats not enough for breaking them up.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Y2K Baby
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back