Harrtam4857
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2020
This Pyro guy is probably a chomo. Fucker had an e-relatiohsip with a 14 when he was 18. https://mobile.twitter.com/KEEMSTAR/status/1341771125806796807
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So did keem just have that girls info lying around for like the past 4 years or is he just lyingThis Pyro guy is probably a chomo. Fucker had an e-relatiohsip with a 14 when he was 18. https://mobile.twitter.com/KEEMSTAR/status/1341771125806796807
suposebly it is a new interview.So did keem just have that girls info lying around for like the past 4 years or is he just lying
The UK is pretty friendly to pedos so don't expect any actual consequences happening to pyro other than a permanent dark taint on his reputation.If Pyro somehow sneaks his way out of this, I'll be surprised. I mean, he's basically already done it by getting a slap on the wrist for sexting a minor. But if he actually manages to get off scott-free, it'd be the ultimate proof that e-celeb status is more powerful than justice.
Turkey's response basically what I've been saying ever since Pyro's response that he has framed the situation in a manipulative way so his drone fans will ignore the fact that he definitively sent porn to a minor and has never proved that he didn't know ivory was 15 (sorry Pyro you saying I DID NAWT I DID NAWT is not iron clade proof across screenshots). Pyro trying to frame RP and porn as "not sexual" when it clearly is ect. The wider community will definitley ignore this as Pyro is more popular and frame it as "Tom lied and pyro is just werid" even tho pyro openly admitted to knowingly sending porn and rping to a minor.
If Pyro somehow sneaks his way out of this, I'll be surprised. I mean, he's basically already done it by getting a slap on the wrist for sexting a minor. But if he actually manages to get off scott-free, it'd be the ultimate proof that e-celeb status is more powerful than justice.
From what I can tell, he doesn’t seem to be pedophile groomer regarding ivory, it’s extremely degenerate fetish play. Now you can make an argument that he was grooming him to be receptive of Discord furry role-playing to say, fetish-mine, but Ivory was already doing rp before he met Pyro. On top of that, if nothing happened when Ivory visited, then that would indicate that he was mainly getting his rocks of to Fursona getting plowed by some other Fursona.Is Pyrocynical a pedophile groomer who contacts with Ivory were of the explicit intention of having a sexual relationship with him?
The main part is the fact that he fucking new that he was talking to a 15/16 year old. Even if he did not know that Ivory was 15 he knew that Ivory was 16 as evident by the fact Ivory talked about getting a fake ID. Also you should not talk to a kid in a sexual manner even if Rp. Add to that pyro jerked off to the Rp he had with this kid. Also pyro never met Ivory, because ivory did not have a passport. Also it makes pyro look very suspicious since he deleted the conversation about the plane ticket with Ivory.From what I can tell, he doesn’t seem to be pedophile groomer regarding ivory, it’s extremely degenerate fetish play. Now you can make an argument that he was grooming him to be receptive of Discord furry role-playing to say, fetish-mine, but Ivory was already doing rp before he met Pyro. On top of that, if nothing happened when Ivory visited, then that would indicate that he was mainly getting his rocks of to Fursona getting plowed by some other Fursona.
If there was any cub-play then that would be a better argument, but I ain’t going to browse gay furry smut chat logs to find it.
But here's the issue: There's no chat log from Pyro directly indicating he knew his age. Now you can say, 'Of course there was, he just deleted it.' However chat logs still remain on Discord even after deletion, hence why you see 'deleted user'. There is a concept in law called "Beyond a reasonable doubt", where you need to have have proof to affirm conviction in a legal case. If you can't find a chat log of that deleted user acknowledging his age, he can explain it as 'oh I didn't see the discord message of him saying he's a minor.' Which is a reasonable doubt, like it or not. Here's the thing about Discord that I don't like: It's utterly ass when it comes to notifications of different servers, I have to scroll all the to the bottom of a discord server to get rid of the notification.The main part is the fact that he fucking new that he was talking to a 15/16 year old. Even if he did not know that Ivory was 15 he knew that Ivory was 16 as evident by the fact Ivory talked about getting a fake ID. Also you should not talk to a kid in a sexual manner even if Rp. Add to that pyro jerked off to the Rp he had with this kid. Also pyro never met Ivory, because ivory did not have a passport. Also it makes pyro look very suspicious since he deleted the conversation about the plane ticket with Ivory.
My verdict pyro should hang from a noose like most chomos.
acording to him(Pyro) he did not want to buy the plane ticket.But here's the issue: There's no chat log from Pyro directly indicating he knew his age. Now you can say, 'Of course there was, he just deleted it.' However chat logs still remain on Discord even after deletion, hence why you see 'deleted user'. There is a concept in law called "Beyond a reasonable doubt", where you need to have have proof to affirm conviction in a legal case. If you can't find a chat log of that deleted user acknowledging his age, he can explain it as 'oh I didn't see the discord message of him saying he's a minor.' Which is a reasonable doubt, like it or not. Here's the thing about Discord that I don't like: It's utterly ass when it comes to notifications of different servers, I have to scroll all the to the bottom of a discord server to get rid of the notification.
That issue becomes compounded if you have a high refresh rate monitor that is a shitty IPS/VA Panel, due to blur accumulating when scrolling fast. I run into this problem all the time on my two HR panels, so people who game on PC probably can just think to themselves, "He games on PC and is a popular youtuber, so he probably can't keep up his notifications." Which is again, reasonable doubt. I thought they met, my bad. Question regarding the Plane Ticket with Ivory: Did he actually bought one for him or only implied he was going to buy one? Or did he said That he wish he could help him out with buying one? Because those are different implications right there.
I'll take being a moralfag over being a furfag any day of the week.Everything else is splitting hairs and moral faggotry.
Okay, so in a theoretical legal case a defense team can argue that Pyro merely wasn't attracted to him as a real person. They can then make the argument that Pyro didn't groom him him for a physical encounter, rather he merely wanted a fursona to rp with. I know that sounds bullshit and that wouldn't work, but Casey Anthony's lawyer frame the murder of her daughter in an accident, the jury ate it up and she was acquitted. You can get away with heinous shit if you have a good lawyer is what I'm saying, so you have to have a solid piece of evidence, no circumstantial evidence bs because that makes you look bad.acording to him(Pyro) he did not want to buy the plane ticket.
Between furries, incels and Mgtows, I don't know which ones respond autistically the most.it's been the same idiot for a month or two now. It comes with the cow, depending on what the subject matter, I've noticed that inflation furries have the most autistic fans.
But here's the issue: There's no chat log from Pyro directly indicating he knew his age. Now you can say, 'Of course there was, he just deleted it.' However chat logs still remain on Discord even after deletion, hence why you see 'deleted user'. There is a concept in law called "Beyond a reasonable doubt", where you need to have have proof to affirm conviction in a legal case. If you can't find a chat log of that deleted user acknowledging his age, he can explain it as 'oh I didn't see the discord message of him saying he's a minor.' Which is a reasonable doubt, like it or not. Here's the thing about Discord that I don't like: It's utterly ass when it comes to notifications of different servers, I have to scroll all the to the bottom of a discord server to get rid of the notification.
That issue becomes compounded if you have a high refresh rate monitor that is a shitty IPS/VA Panel, due to blur accumulating when scrolling fast. I run into this problem all the time on my two HR panels, so people who game on PC probably can just think to themselves, "He games on PC and is a popular youtuber, so he probably can't keep up his notifications." Which is again, reasonable doubt. I thought they met, my bad. Question regarding the Plane Ticket with Ivory: Did he actually bought one for him or only implied he was going to buy one? Or did he said That he wish he could help him out with buying one? Because those are different implications right there.
I saw that, but he framed it as 'I didn't know when I was first messaging him.' Which like I said before, You need something solid of him acknowledging it when first started talking. Legally it can, at least in terms of libel in Britain. If he sent n00ds then, then he can be prosecuted for solicitation(at least here in the states.) Ultimately it's still he said/he said still.Ivory sent Pyro his twitter bio showing that Ivory was 16 Pyro admits this in his response. He says he knew when Ivory was 16. As far as I can tell no plane ticket was bought but this was after Pyro knew Ivory was 16, which is why they discussed fake IDs for the bar. Legally I don't think Pyro can or should be prosecuted this is purely an issue of a creator abusing his position for sexual gratification.
I'll take being a moralfag over being a furfag any day of the week.
Legally I don't think Pyro can or should be prosecuted this is purely an issue of a creator abusing his position for sexual gratification.
Was Pyrocynical trying to meet up with Ivory to have sex with him? Probably notYou didn't answer my question. Are you willing to proclaim Pyrocynical a pedophile groomer whose relations and interaction with Ivory was for the goal of having a IRL sexual relationship with him?
Then in that case, everyone should've called it a day and gone home before Turk Tommy came along. If you wanna give him guff for being a furry sex fiend, go ahead. But as of now, this has become nothing but a cultural flame war over splitting hairs and moral faggotry since his relationship with Ivory or anyone else being floated around is worthy of cancelling imo, let alone putting him in the slammer.