"Queen Bee" sperging

[BigAltheGreat921]

All I'm going to say is that this WEEN kid is wasting everyone's time. He shouldn't have started all this in the first place.

 

[Kosher Dill]

I feel like anyone truly worried about dragging Megan into this should have a problem with the details of her life (including hacked personal emails) being all over the internet including referencing her full name and details on this public forum.

I dunno guys- not meaning to cause issues or to get on people's backs. I feel like Chris watching is a wildly amoral guilty pleasure pursuit at best and I don't always understand attempting to draw moral lines out of amorality or the particular boundaries that become consensus.

Well yes, we really should be better about the "civilians" in this saga. The Jew, The Witch, Fro Guy, and the rest should probably be anonymized on the CWCki at least a little. But the fact that existing bad behavior hasn't been corrected doesn't mean we can just throw up our hands when someone new comes along and tries to point an unstable man at one of his previous real-life victims for one tenth of a lul. The right answer is to say "Yes, this is wrong AND we also need to re-examine our current practices."

 

[NiggoFiggo]

I dont get this obsession with chris making videos

 

[Hitler]

Chris has semi-recently tried to stalk her, buying her personal info

When exactly did this happen? All of his recent messages have been him asking for her to contact him and even if he said something about data brokers, it was an empty threat.
This is what Chris is doing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70LvKzxe ... u.be&t=24s and we're supposed to be concerned?

Another thing making Fake Megan contemptible, by the way, is that "she" brought Lucas back into this, who hasn't been an object of Chris's attention lately. I hope Chris forgot his last name.

Chris received the message from this troll on the 5th and mentioned Lucas on a post he made on the 4th. Do you really think Chris would forget about someone he had a grudge against?

there are some great trolls trolling Chris nowadays

Like...?

Chris's mindset is that Megan is an evil bitch who has tirelessly spent the last 6+ years trying to make his life a living hell. Why would he apologize to her for that? "She" tried to logically explain why it's not "her" fault all of these bad things have happened to him, but we all know that's not how Chris's mind works. He is always the victim, no matter what he, or anyone else, does. Those are the rules of the game and you have to play by them if you want to win. If this ween impostor was smart or had any real insight into Chris's psychology, Fake Megan would have approached Chris as seeking reconciliation or forgiveness from him, not the other way around.

Chris's mindset was that Alec was an evil troll who was trying to make a mockery out of him and steal all his Sonichu fans away. Why would he apologize to him for that? He tried to logically explain why he put ads on his site and that Asperchu was original and not a parody of him, but we all know that's not how Chris's mind works. He is always the victim, no matter what he, or anyone else, does. Those are the rules of the game and you have to play by them if you want to win. If Alec was smart or had any real insight into Chris's psychology, Alec would have approached Chris as seeking reconciliation or forgiveness from him, not the other way around.

And yet...
[youtube]oZuXOeUyqv8[/youtube]
[youtube]-1qhq7mp5Qk[/youtube]

Also, likely because they're doing the same thing as the 'classic' trolls is why the new breed are being called weens. It's shown that Chris has learnt, why would he fall for a fake sweetheart again? The only reason he believed this ween is because he's BLINDED WITH FRUSTRATION.

So because he's not original in his plan he's ween? That would make every 'sweetheart' after blanca ween right? That would make Liquid (who tried to steal Chris identity after Jimmy Hill tried to steal his identity) ween right? That would make Bluespike ween for pretending to be a sweetheart and getting Chris to make the sex tape and send it to him after Blanca did both those things right? That would make Alec the highest tier of ween after he made parody comics like Jimmy Hill, Liquid and so many others, took on the role of Jackie like so many other 'sweethearts', used ads on the CWCki like Jack Thaddeus and for recording calls like Kacey did right? That would make the entire CWCki ween for copying ED right? This would make Surfshack Tito ween for hacking Chris's PSN after Clyde did it right?
Like I said this is just people being nostalgiafags. The classics can copy each other over and over and we'll love them and think their version of the same trick is amazing each time but the new guys have to come up with something entirely original or else they're ween. And you're flat out wrong anyways, Chris hasn't learned anything because he can't and it's not a case of him falling for a fake sweetheart again, this new person is coming to Chris basically as an enemy. So they are coming at Chris from a new angle and they're already fucking despised by half the forum.

 

[Targaryen]

I feel like anyone truly worried about dragging Megan into this should have a problem with the details of her life (including hacked personal emails) being all over the internet including referencing her full name and details on this public forum.

I dunno guys- not meaning to cause issues or to get on people's backs. I feel like Chris watching is a wildly amoral guilty pleasure pursuit at best and I don't always understand attempting to draw moral lines out of amorality or the particular boundaries that become consensus.

Well yes, we really should be better about the "civilians" in this saga. The Jew, The Witch, Fro Guy, and the rest should probably be anonymized on the CWCki at least a little. But the fact that existing bad behavior hasn't been corrected doesn't mean we can just throw up our MANOS when someone new comes along and tries to point an unstable man at one of his previous real-life victims for one tenth of a lul. The right answer is to say "Yes, this is wrong AND we also need to re-examine our current practices."

If it wasn't for immoral and irresponsible prying and trolling of various shades (and Chris's reactions to it), we wouldn't know 50% of what we do about Chris now... if that. Most of us probably wouldn't have the morbid fascination that we do. Christorical studies are essentially founded on shady morals and irresponsibility.

I see where you're coming from but I think you're trying to hold back a ship that sailed a long, long time ago. So personally I'm either going to look away in disgust or sit back and amoraly observe like I always have. The two consistent positions from where I'm stood.

 

[Dr RobotDick]

I feel like anyone truly worried about dragging Megan into this should have a problem with the details of her life (including hacked personal emails) being all over the internet including referencing her full name and details on this public forum.

I dunno guys- not meaning to cause issues or to get on people's backs. I feel like Chris watching is a wildly amoral guilty pleasure pursuit at best and I don't always understand attempting to draw moral lines out of amorality or the particular boundaries that become consensus.

I think I agree with you if I'm understanding your point correctly. It really upsets me that if you do a google search of Megan's name, literally the first thing that comes up is a link to her CWCki article. People act like her non-involvement in Chris's current escapades means that she's immune from harm, but that alone has to fuck with her life at least a little bit. It's even more disturbing that people are actually trying to find her and contact her. Even if they're not being totally malicious, they should leave her the fuck alone. I've read excuses why her name can't be removed from the CWCki, but I think at least removing her last name would be totally doable, it would just take some time and effort.

I'm not really bothered by people discussing anything Chris makes public, because he actually seems to like that. But anything private, especially if it involves innocent people who aren't seeking attention, should be kept private.

 

[Stalin]

The person impersonating Megan is obviously fake (to us), but I don't know if I'd say ween. A little uneducated, maybe. They were presented the opportunity to use Chris, and they took it. Just trolling, not ween.

Chris is really dumb for falling for it, though.

 

[Cwckifan]

I feel like anyone truly worried about dragging Megan into this should have a problem with the details of her life (including hacked personal emails) being all over the internet including referencing her full name and details on this public forum.

I dunno guys- not meaning to cause issues or to get on people's backs. I feel like Chris watching is a wildly amoral guilty pleasure pursuit at best and I don't always understand attempting to draw moral lines out of amorality or the particular boundaries that become consensus.

Targaryen, the problem here is that Megan has had no contact with Chris in years, and wants no contact with him ever, meaning that it's unwise for anyone to drag her back into it. Moreover, her information will be removed at her request, and there's not much about her on the CWCki that can't be found with a casual Google search. Chris, however, could've stopped feeding the trolls at any time, and that he didn't isn't the fault of anyone but him. Moreover, how is this forum about Chris any different than a forum dedicated to a celebrity? There's nothing we do here that's not done by TMZ (or whoever), and there's no truly incriminating information on here or the CWCKI that he didn't post himself.

 

[Marvin]

there are some great trolls trolling Chris nowadays

Like...?

Not public yet.

If it wasn't for immoral and irresponsible prying and trolling of various shades (and Chris's reactions to it), we wouldn't know 50% of what we do about Chris now... if that. Most of us probably wouldn't have the morbid fascination that we do. Christorical studies are essentially founded on shady morals and irresponsibility.

I see where you're coming from but I think you're trying to hold back a ship that sailed a long, long time ago. So personally I'm either going to look away in disgust or sit back and amoraly observe like I always have. The two consistent positions from where I'm stood.

Eh, I don't know. Well, and people have different standards of morality.

I would say that, earlier trolling was pretty wrong, by my standards, at least. We did lots of assholish things to Chris. I think that we should've made a good, honest attempt to get Chris off the internet. Back then, Chris was like a child who ran out into the street.

But nowadays, I have no problem with Chris getting trolled*. Chris has definitely known for a long time the correct way to react to the trolls. Chris knows what he's supposed to be doing, he's just not doing it. Or, not doing it consistently. Chris makes tons of private facebook posts. The public ones he makes are ones he specifically wants to share with the troll world.

Well, and nowadays, quite a few people have made strong efforts to do the right thing with Chris. It's not really feasible for Chris to be safe from trolling anymore. Chris is a dumbass and will be running out into the street deliberately for the foreseeable future.

*Except when it involves innocent bystanders.

 

[Christ-Chan]

Chris makes tons of private facebook posts. The public ones he makes are ones he specifically wants to share with the troll world.

I probably shouldn't be barking up that tree, but what are the odds that someone might hack his Facebook and share those private posts with the community?

 

[Pikonic]

I think I agree with you if I'm understanding your point correctly. It really upsets me that if you do a google search of Megan's name, literally the first thing that comes up is a link to her CWCki article.

I wouldn't mind seeing her last name off the CWCki.

 

[Cwckifan]

Pikonic, if it really is true that we like something more when we have to work for it, then isn't it possible that adding some anonymity to Megan would inspire more prying, if just out of curiosity? Really, whoever's interested is interested, so how would removing information (that someone might really want to know) be any help?

 

[FearfulJesuit]

Marvin, do you have some sort of mole able to read the private Facebook posts? (Not that you should necessarily share them- but are they being catalogued?)

 

[Marvin]

Chris makes tons of private facebook posts. The public ones he makes are ones he specifically wants to share with the troll world.

I probably shouldn't be barking up that tree, but what are the odds that someone might hack his Facebook and share those private posts with the community?

Uhh, maybe at some point in the future, Chris will add the wrong person and then they'll leak everything.

Marvin, do you have some sort of mole able to read the private Facebook posts? (Not that you should necessarily share them- but are they being catalogued?)

MMmmmmmaayyyybbbbeee...

 

[TrippinKahlua]

Just ask the NSA if you want a dossier on CWC's facebook.

 

[Ahffline]

Personally I find the somewhat arbitrary faux-ethics that some in this community attempt to uphold hard to take seriously or respect.

This is a web forum for the mocking voyeurism of an extremely disturbed mentally disabled man (one regularly strewn with slur words aimed at the mentally disabled at that) I'm not saying anything should go but no mental gymnastics or code of conduct is going to make following/discussing Chris morally clean. I'm as bad as anyone on that count.

Again, I'm not saying open season on Chris or those connected with his saga but no one on here me included can really take the moral high ground with any credibility. Or the high ground of cool/non-sad behaviour.. lets be real.

There's a clear-cut difference between those who passively follow Chris content, and those who actively harass or troll him. It's pretty straightforward, imo. It'smridiculous to claim that people who have never had any contact with Chris are in similar to those who actively troll him. The two situations are completely different. While it's true that I wouldn't be here chatting about CWC if he'd never become infamous on the Internet, being here doesn't make me immoral or unethical. It makes me a person who is interested in discussing and following the actions of someone who has become an infamous public figure of Internet culture.

Chris is a Internet celebrity, so following or discussing what he does isn't immoral. Celebrities are discussed and mocked all the time. There's no difference between discussing the stupidity of what Chris does and ragging on Miley Cyrus for her recent twerking 'scandal.' Me posting my opinions about Chris is no different than me expressing my views about Miley Cyrus, the U.S. Congress, or any other topic that holds my interest.

 

[CharlesBarkley]

This is pretty funny. Don't know why some of you guys are so worried about Megan, it's not like Chris is going to do anything to her.

Unless, ya know, his lego voodoo salt shaker starts working.

 

[Dr RobotDick]

Pikonic, if it really is true that we like something more when we have to work for it, then isn't it possible that adding some anonymity to Megan would inspire more prying, if just out of curiosity? Really, whoever's interested is interested, so how would removing information (that someone might really want to know) be any help?

It really upsets me that if you do a google search of Megan's name, literally the first thing that comes up is a link to her CWCki article. People act like her non-involvement in Chris's current escapades means that she's immune from harm, but that alone has to fuck with her life at least a little bit.

Yeah, I just quoted myself, but fuck it.

It's one thing if creepy assholes on the internet want to stalk her, that's just the fucked up world we live in nowadays. But it's another thing if any potential employers, or god forbid her future kids can have access to all this shit with very minimal effort.

 

[Tubular Monkey]

Or maybe he had contacted her to get more information about her and that's why she knows how to get ahold of him. You definitely can't blame her completely for everything that's happened, I think she played a very small role. The real blame lies with all the scumbags that have continuously trolled you through the years.

Thanks, Anna. What Chris really needs is somewhere to point the blame other than himself. It'll be at you some day.

 

[QueenMegan]

Chris, gullible as always. Maybe he should make that video, and get his Sailor Moon DVD back.