"Queen Bee" sperging

[The Dude]

For the record while the "He thought his life would get better" is part of it he banged the hooker because he thought he was going to prison and he didn't want to die a virgin. He planned to go on a hunger strike while there.

As if he would've carried through on it, this is a guy who crashes down in slumber when things get marginally difficult. He'd crack pretty quickly and would be far more likely to end up getting killed by another prisoner, unless the guards were smart enough to keep him isolated.

Now, I myself have never been to prison or know much about its regulations, but wouldn't Chris be an ideal candidate for a Protective Custody ward of some kind? I mean, like you say, he's a stabbing just waiting to happen if he were to be put in general population, even in a county jail.

Chris wouldn't have gone to prison, it'd have been the county pokey. Also being an aspertistic jackass is not enough to get put in a protective wing. You basically have to be a high value target, like an informant or the like or even a former police officer where people WILL try to kill you. Snitches get stitches, cops get popped.

 

[A-№1]

Yes, but as experiences go it's a big one. Probably the biggest. The driving force behind life has always been making more life, and so you have millions of year of evolution shaping your body and brain to make the payoff for procreation as big as possible.

Don't get me wrong, sex is ultimately vital to the survival of the human race but it shouldn't be the only thing on your mind.

Yeah, finding food and avoiding predators are also pretty important.

It's far more fulfilling to find someone whom you resonate with on an emotional, mental, and spiritual level beforehand since lust is a hollow pursuit that will always leave you wanting more.

It can be argued that all those desires evolved to create an incentive to provide a stable family environment to maximize the chance to successfully raise H. sapiens offspring through their incredibly extended childhoods.

Also, having sex with a prostitute (Which is what Chris did) doesn't result in procreation (Unless something goes horribly wrong) so even that one purpose is left out,

Yeah, but your pituitary doesn't know that. It just knows to release lots of yummy endorphins.

making it little more than glorified masturbation so my point remains the same.

I wouldn't say "little" more. There are a lot of sensory stimuli that you don't get from masturbation that seriously enhance the experience of intercourse, procreative or not.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that regular sex with a copacetic long term partner you have a fulfilling relationship isn't the ideal. I'm just saying that our bodies and brains are evolved to treat even meaningless hooker sex as physically very rewarding.

I think this SMBC comic is sort of related, and it's funny so I'm posting it.

 

[The Dude]

I think this SMBC comic is sort of related, and it's funny so I'm posting it.

So what you're saying is: We neuter the Chris-chan

 

[Holdek]

Chris seems to be dead set on going to prison. At least he'll finally get the counseling he so desperately needs...

He won't go to prison. And even if he did he wouldn't get the counseling he needs there.

 

[Tubular Monkey]

Chris seems to be dead set on going to prison. At least he'll finally get the counseling he so desperately needs...

He won't go to prison. And even if he did he wouldn't get the counseling he needs there.

True enough. Chris will spend the rest of his life at least as insane as he is now. Best case scenario, the facility that ends up with him tranqs him up so much he does little else but sit in a corner all day. But he will be going back to jail.

 

[calicojack]

It's just a matter of time until Chris decides to take the necessary steps to enact vengeance on Megan for the supposed "atrocities" she had implemented on him for the past eight years or so. But I don't take Chris to be a good plan maker or even have the capacity for such a thing.

 

[Some JERK]

It's just a matter of time until Chris decides to take the necessary steps to enact vengeance on Megan for the supposed "atrocities" she had implemented on him for the past eight years or so. But I don't take Chris to be a good plan maker or even have the capacity for such a thing.

I might believe that when he's capable of taking the necessary steps to report a power outage to the utility company.

 

[Zim]

It's just a matter of time until Chris decides to take the necessary steps to enact vengeance on Megan for the supposed "atrocities" she had implemented on him for the past eight years or so. But I don't take Chris to be a good plan maker or even have the capacity for such a thing.

Possibly he'll do this by playing it out with legos or maybe in his imagination. The day he actually goes and enacts on one of his revenge fantasies is the day I will attempt to eat one of my hats.

Chris's plans always involve magical thinking or someone else doing all the work while he just lumps around.

 

[Holdek]

Personally I find the somewhat arbitrary faux-ethics that some in this community attempt to uphold hard to take seriously or respect.

This is a web forum for the mocking voyeurism of an extremely disturbed mentally disabled man (one regularly strewn with slur words aimed at the mentally disabled at that) I'm not saying anything should go but no mental gymnastics or code of conduct is going to make following/discussing Chris morally clean. I'm as bad as anyone on that count.

Again, I'm not saying open season on Chris or those connected with his saga but no one on here me included can really take the moral high ground with any credibility. Or the high ground of cool/non-sad behaviour.. lets be real.

There's a rather clear line between the ethics of discussing someone and the ethics of pushing someone with obvious problems over the edge in pursuit of "content".

The Megan impostor is exemplary of this reckless disregard for both Chris's own welfare and the welfare of others, not to mention the most retarded attempt I've ever seen at extracting favors from Chris. Hence, the reason people are taking this one rather seriously.

So you think an active forum dedicated to discussing every detail of Chris's personal life in a mocking/critical manner doesn't play any part in this paranoid and disturbed individual hovering close to the brink? You can argue it's Chris' fault this place and the rest of the staggering large collection of information about him online is there. I'm pretty sure he'd still be badly messed up and getting himself into trouble if it wasn't.

However at the risk of exceeding the hurtful truth level- I can't defend this faux-Megan troll's actions in good conscious, but I can't truly and without mental gymnasitics defend my voyeuristic following of Chris or the existence of this forum either. Making this taboo and not every other way we contribute to Megan and Chris's names being splatter all over the internet.. to me personally feels arbitrary and inconsistent. Certainly much of the "classic" Chris trolling doesn't seem any less malicious or irresponsible.

Are you harassing Chris? Misrepresenting yourself in conversations with him? If not and you are just talking about him in a forum that he is free to ignore then you don't have anything to worry about ethically.

 

[CWCissey]

I just love conversations about the morality of the CWCki and these forums(!)

 

[Zim]

I just love conversations about the morality of the CWCki and these forums(!)

Good... Bad.... We're the ones with the forum.

 

[CWCissey]

I just love conversations about the morality of the CWCki and these forums(!)

Good... Bad.... We're the ones with the forum.

We are the ones who mock...

 

[BillRiley]

I just love conversations about the morality of the CWCki and these forums(!)

Good... Bad.... We're the ones with the forum.

+1 Internet for the AoD reference.

Chris's plans always involve magical thinking or someone else doing all the work while he just lumps around.

^This. Chris has a much of a chance of getting his revengance as a wax dog has of catching an asbestos cat in hell.

 

[CatParty]

"lumps" is the best adjective for chris.

ever.

 

[Cwckifan]

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that regular sex with a copacetic long term partner you have a fulfilling relationship isn't the ideal. I'm just saying that our bodies and brains are evolved to treat even meaningless hooker sex as physically very rewarding.

Maybe so, and so is art, friendship, survival, and lots of other non-sex things enjoyed by basically all beings more complex than a rock. Really, is it so impossible that features of the Human (or non-Human) psyche evolved not because they helped a cavemen get laid, but because we're complex beings with thoughts and feelings, and not 'feed, fight, fuck' robots?

 

[MetroidJunkie]

It can be argued that all those desires evolved to create an incentive to provide a stable family environment to maximize the chance to successfully raise H. sapiens offspring through their incredibly extended childhoods.

Can it be argued? Yes, but not very well. We're literally the only animal that's shown capable of such emotions. If it was a matter of evolution, humans wouldn't be the only animals that happened to obtain it to maximize survival. Also, I don't believe in macro-evolution anyway, the evidence is overwhelmingly against it. Micro-evolution is a different story, but that's just small adaptive changes within a species.

 

[CatParty]

this is falling into "deep thoughts" territory again

 

[Pikonic]

BACK ON TRACK PEOPLE!!!!
Chris is still mad at Megan. How naive lol!!!1ONE

Please go to general and make a new thread.


EDIT:
Here, I made one viewtopic.php?f=18&p=101028#p101028

 

[Hasharin]

Also, I don't believe in macro-evolution anyway, the evidence is overwhelmingly against it. Micro-evolution is a different story, but that's just small adaptive changes within a species.

So what does stop small changes from accumulating into large changes?

 

[QI 541]

It can be argued that all those desires evolved to create an incentive to provide a stable family environment to maximize the chance to successfully raise H. sapiens offspring through their incredibly extended childhoods.

Can it be argued? Yes, but not very well. We're literally the only animal that's shown capable of such emotions. If it was a matter of evolution, humans wouldn't be the only animals that happened to obtain it to maximize survival. Also, I don't believe in macro-evolution anyway, the evidence is overwhelmingly against it. Micro-evolution is a different story, but that's just small adaptive changes within a species.

I suggest you learn more about evolution... from non-creationist sources.