question about the "Jews are purposely destroying the west" theory

Train Operator

conductor on the glow rail
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 11, 2024
specifically I've never understood the logic behind the whole "jews are sending Muslims to Europe in an attempt to destroy it" narrative. I know there's a kernel of truth to it since I've seen plenty of videos of Jewish people saying they're glad Europe is being destroyed and the organizations responsible for bringing them in are largely made up of jews, but to what end would they be doing this supposedly?

As far as i can tell the narrative is something like this:

>Be Israel
>be surrounded by Muslims that hate you and want you wiped from the earth
>the only thing keeping you from getting fucking annihilated is the western superpowers protecting you
>flood These same superpowers with the people who hate you
>because of this these superpowers are now on track to be majority people who hate you within 50 years

can someone explain to me how The jews are supposedly simultaneously smart enough to be this super cunning race of Machiavellian manipulators that brought Christendom to it's knees while also being too stupid to realize replacing all of your allies with people who hate you and want you dead by any means necessary is a bad idea? I know the argument from people who hate jews are probably something like "they view white people as a bigger threat" or "they're getting revenge for how they were treated by whites for the past 2000 years" but if that's really what's happening that's incredibly retarded.
 
Last edited:
No, dude, you got it wrong, it's the local jews that are replacing white people! They are replacing them cause they are harder to control! And those white people that have been benevolent to them and helping them out for decades are harder to control than the brownoids that hate them because... uh... um...
 
It is not that jews are particularly intelligent, it is that Jews acknowledge all jews ( more or less) as part of their in group and work together for mutual benefit, and place all ( more or less) non Jews in their out group. Easiest example of this is nepotism, but rather than it being simple familial ties, although it still usually is that,it is Jewish ties that are the important factor. Another example is, like blacs and probably where blacks learned it from, Jews will defend other Jews who have been charged with crimes to the hilt if possible. Consider the anti-defamation League, which was founded to exonerate a pedophile jew from New York City who owned a pencil factory in Georgia who raped and murdered a 14-year-old girl in his employ unequivocally. Jews were able to form an institution that got a pedophile who raped and murdered a 14-year-old girl in his employ pardoned by the governor of Georgia. Now I say they defend them to the hilt if possible because they're are counterexamples where Jews are willing to burn other Jews in service of a greater goal, consider Jeffrey Epstein, a Jew who reportedly made a lot of money in finance despite people who were familiar with him before he made it big puzzled by his later success because he was dumb, who trafficked miners to prominent goys for the purposes of blackmail in service of the Jewish nation, ghislane Maxwell's father was as an Israeli intelligence hero and was buried in their equivalent of Arlington cemetery. jews did not feel it was worth the optics damage to try and get him pardoned so they let him go. another example is harvey Weinstein.

Jews have a specific vision as a nation and collaboratively work towards that vision in a way that goys do not. Jews may disagree on how to achieve that vision, but they do not allow such disagreements to come to such a level that personal acrimony hinders the vision. Great example of this is the Jewish response to October 7th. The overwhelming genocidal response from the Israeli Jews caused a lot of headaches for the diaspora Jews, specifically in the Biden administration which is one of the most Jewish administrations in the history of the United States. The totally blind and uncompromising support that the United States gives Israel, including The largest bombing mission by tonnage in the history of the world perpetuated by Israel which was only possible due to munitions that America gives Israel for free, really put the Biden administration in a bind because they had to pull munitions that could have gone to ukraine in favor of blindly supporting such blatant genocide really hurt america internationally.having to choose between arming your cold war proxy and arming your genocidal coethinics in a very ugly and public way really put The diaspora Jews America in a bind that it didn't have to be in had Israel went with a much more measured response and waited for the media cycle to die down and then continue to slow roll the settlement and genocide of the Palestinians.

Jews are not a monolith, however they do talk to each other and are generally on the same page with the overall goal.
A general hurdle a lot of people have that I have noticed in recognizing Jews as a nation that have goals is they want Israel to be slaves to an abstract, which is not how Jews operate. Jews adopt abstract ideas to benefit their people first and foremost, and will disregard ideas when they are no longer advantageous for their people. a great example of this is asking jews if they would apply what they say should be done in the united states should be done to isreal, or to view how their talking points change when isreal is threatened. whatever they say is generally just whatever they think you need to hear to support them and their goals. check out how ben shaprio goes from "israel can take care of itself" to "if america doesnt send israel a billion artillery shells, we are going to nuke america". sadly i cant find it right now but i will post something else funny.

And yes Jews are incredibly retarded, we are currently living in the era of Jewish failsons who only got where they are on the inertia of their predecessor's successes and benefited greatly from the nepotism they're in. Jews have been subject to the same birth rate decline as everyone else, but this is particularly hit the subset of Jews that did a lot of the heavy lifting to get them where they are now which is what are called labor Jews which you may describe as having a generally liberal mindset. This group is pretty much non-existent politically in Israel, in favor of the radical Orthodox Jews that fit every Jewish character you can think of. They are incredibly inbred and extremely narcissistic for their race the most evil shit You can imagine. case in point, there is a very serious debate happening in israel right now regarding whether or not israeli prison guards who raped palestian prisoners should even be charged with a crime. Netanyahu built a coalition out of radical Orthodox Jews including the extremely inbred settler Jews as a power block to get himself reelected. These are by far the dumbest and most violent retarded Jews who completely believe they could take on the entire Earth by themselves right now. No obviously you're thinking why don't the diaspora jews do something about The Israeli Jews fucking the whole project up, and It appears that Jews are reaching the limits of that cooperation. The Israeli Jews want the diaspora Jews to come to Israel, whereas the diasporate use don't think that Israel is capable of defending itself without diaspora jews running these European colonies.

And to get back to how diaspora juice feel about bringing Muslims over to Europe, diaspora Jews have very successfully created their own ethnic enclaves with their own civil services that exist exclusively to benefit Jews. So it's not as if Jews are subject to the same problems as white people where Muslims and blacks etc are moved into the houses next door to them, and even if they are Jews have their own racial police to defend them from such things, look up the shomrim of you don't believe me, and will very much use the institutions they have created to cause political headaches for any politician that tries to subject Jewish communities to the same racial replacement. There is a city in New York state I forget the name of it, but it is almost exclusively Jewish, and the governor of New York attempted to move some of these racial aliens into that community because they were running out of places to put them elsewhere, and the Jewish communities therein very quickly got legal support to make it not happen as well as cause significant political headaches for the politicians that tried to make that happen.
Tl;Dr Jews are not a monolith, they are not slaves to abstractions, and they have only gotten dumber and more brazen over time, and Jews are believe they are capable of maintaining a two-tiered system in a Western countries, and have many recorded successes in doing so
 

Attachments

  • Ben Shapiro Why Won't You Move To Israel Telegram.mp4
    3.7 MB
Last edited:
Liberal Jews, Zionist Jews, and Ultraorthodox Jews all hate each other, so it's not a stretch to assume Jewish politicians in the West don't get along with Jewish politicians in Israel. Also cause there isn't a "united global cabal" you mongs, otherwise Jews in hollywood wouldn't be pushing for the dismantlement of the Zionist state in Palestine and vice versa...
 
Wealthy Jews use being Jewish as a shield for their nepotism, but don't support the interests of Jews when it doesn't benefit them personally. Middle class Jews are self-hating Jews that were raised in environments with extremely liberal and progressive ideology. The JQ is retarded because it over-complicates things out of mindless Jew-hatred, so that there is an incoherent web of Jewish conspiracies that are increasingly unbelievable.
 
Jews don't believe Christ died for their sins so they're trying to end the world so that the Real Savior™️will show up and save them (they are the chosen ones after all)

It makes sense when you read the Torah and learn that they are a people who believe they can outsmart God himself.
 
Zionist Jews, Traditionalist Jews, Orthodox Jews, Hollywood Jews and your New York journoscum kikes have very little in common with each other and more often than not fucking hate each other. Some of them are trying to orchestrate the downfall of the west for retarded reasons and others aren;t.

Solution? Deport them all to Israel and let them all sort it out themselves. That or just drop atomic bombs on LA and Manhattan.
 
Wealthy Jews use being Jewish as a shield for their nepotism, but don't support the interests of Jews when it doesn't benefit them personally. Middle class Jews are self-hating Jews that were raised in environments with extremely liberal and progressive ideology. The JQ is retarded because it over-complicates things out of mindless Jew-hatred, so that there is an incoherent web of Jewish conspiracies that are increasingly unbelievable.
how did anton lavey and alfred einstein personally benefit from supporting zionism.
 
It is mostly whites importing immigrants into their countries. Jews are the middle men.
How do you square that with the massive Jewish influence on immigration laws in the US?

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.n...65-immigration-law-a-reply-to-abraham-miller/... Jewish organizations and Jewish academic activism were a necessary condition for passage of the 1965 immigration law, as discussed in Chapter 7 of The Culture of Critique. The data I bring to bear on this issue leaves little doubt that Jewish organizations as well as restrictionists and anti-restrictionists in Congress understood that Jewish organizations had spearheaded the movement against the national origins provisions of the 1924 law and for opening up immigration to all the peoples of the world. Jewish organizations maintained their pressure over the 40 years since the passage of the 1924 law, often combating public apathy on the issue—in particular during the 1950s. Jewish organizations, such as the American Jewish Committee, organized, funded, and performed most of the work of a variety of umbrella organizations aimed at combating restrictions on immigration (e.g., the National Liberal Immigration League; the Citizens Committee for Displaced Persons; the National Commission on Immigration and Citizenship; the American Immigration Conference). The 1965 reform was thus not the result of popular pressure but rather of a 40-year program of activism. Finally, the “liberalizing wave” that resulted in the 1965 law was critically influenced by the other Jewish movements...
 
Define "Jews".
vlcsnap-2012-01-23-23h46m27s36.png
 
Massive is an overstatement. It is mostly whites doing it, with a jew here and there.


here is a 32 page document written by a professor who is widely regarded as an expert on the subject who makes an excellent case to the contrary. here are a few quotations, as well as the document in its entirety. part 5 is really the part of particular interest to this discussion

“the transformation of the ethnoreligious
demography of American academic life by Jews” in the period from the 1930s to
the 1960s, as well as the Jewish influence on trends toward the secularization of
American society and in advancing an ideal of cosmopolitanism (11); Hollinger
(1996: 160) notes that “One force in this [culture war of the 1940s] was a secular,
increasingly Jewish, decidedly left-of-center intelligentsia based largely ... in the
disciplinary communities of philosophy and the social sciences.” Lipset and Ladd
(1971), using survey data of 60,000 academics from 1969, show that the 1960s were
a critical period for the rise of Jewish academics in elite universities who were in
general well to the left of non-Jewish professors. Jews represented around 12% of
faculty in general, but around 25% of the younger faculty (less than age 50) at Ivy
League universities—percentages that were much higher than in previous decades.
Moreover, a considerably larger percentage of Jewish faculty rated themselves as
liberal or left (74.5%), compared to less than 40% of non-Jewish faculty. A substantial
majority (59.1%) of Jewish faculty approved of 1960s’ student radical activism,
compared to around 40% for non-Jewish faculty. Jewish faculty were also more likely
to approve relaxing standards in order to recruit more minority faculty and students.
Jewish faculty were more heavily published than non-Jewish faculty, indicat-
ing greater influence. This is important because the academic world is a top-down
institution: those at the top train the next generation of scholars and police the
Philosophia
1 3
recruitment of new faculty
The rise of this new elite implies that analysis cannot be restricted to only one
issue, such as immigration policy without discussing the wider context. Rather, it
implies that vital issues of public policy, including immigration, the civil rights of
African-Americans, women’s rights, religion in the public square (Hollinger’s “sec-
ularization of American society”), the legitimacy of white racial identity and inter-
ests, cosmopolitanism, foreign policy in the Middle East, and many others will be
affected by the attitudes and interests of this new elite. Thus, the immigration law of
1965 and the civil rights movement cannot be discussed independently of academic
and media perspectives on race. CofC discusses the role of Jewish intellectuals in
the sea change in academic views related to race (Ch. 2) and how Boasian ideology
had become dominant in the Congressional debates of 1965 on immigration
“Most important for the content of immigration
reform, the driving force at the core of the movement, reaching back to the 1920s,
were Jewish organizations long active in opposing racial and ethnic quotas. … Jew-
ish political leaders in New York, most prominently Governor Herbert Lehman,
had pioneered in the 1940s in passing state antidiscrimination legislation. Impor-
tantly [because of the national origins provisions of the 1924 law giving preference
to immigration from northwest Europe], these statutes and executive orders added
‘national origin’ to race, color, and religion as impermissible grounds for discrimi-
nation.” Similarly, Otis Graham (2004) noted that “The political core of a coalition
pressing for a new, more ‘liberalized’ policy regime was composed of ethnic lob-
byists … claiming to speak for nationalities migrating prior to the National Origins
1 3
Philosophia
Act of 1924, the most effective being Jews from central and eastern Europe who
were deeply concerned with the rise of fascism and anti-semitism on the continent
and eternally interested in haven” (see also Graham, 2004: 67).
The older German-Jewish com-
munity, while expressing distaste for their rather unrefined immigrant co-ethnics,
was instrumental in keeping America’s open immigration system long after immi-
gration from eastern and southern Europe had ceased to be popular in the popula-
tion at large. Thus Sen. Henry Cabot Lodge, leader of the restrictionists, wrote to a
friend during the second presidency of Grover Cleveland (1893–1897), “Influences
on [Cleveland] were used yesterday which I will explain to you when we meet and
which were very hard to overcome”; to another he “said these other forces repre-
sented neither corporations or political factions” (in Okrent, 2019: 72). Okrent notes
that they “were almost certainly members of America’s moneyed and influential
German Jewish community” (73), such as Jacob Schiff “who made a personal plea
to Grover Cleveland to veto the literacy test” (Ibid.). (Prior to focusing on national
origins, immigration restrictionists promoted a literacy test as a means of restricting
immigration.)
For a quarter of a century … Lodge, the IRL [Immigration Restriction
League], and their allies would have to contend with an array of influential
organizations dominated by wealthy German Jews. … Collectively, they com-
posed a formidable and enduring opposition. … The emergence in the 1890s
of organized, wealthy, and well-connected Jews working on behalf of the
immigrants presented Lodge and his colleagues with an opposition that few
Boston Brahmins had encountered. (Okrent, 2019: 72, 73)
In the subse-
quent period leading up to the relatively ineffective restrictionist legislation of
Philosophia
1 3
1917, when restrictionists again mounted an effort in Congress, “only the Jewish
segment was aroused” (Cohen, 1972: 49). It’s important to note that this influence
occurred despite Jewish influence being far less than after World War II and dra-
matically less than during the 1960s’ debates on immigration, by which time the
older WASP elite had been replaced by a substantially Jewish elite.
Jews contributed from two thirds to three quarters of the money for civil
rights groups during the 1960s (Kaufman, 1997: 110). “Jewish support, legal and
monetary, afforded the civil rights movement a string of legal victories. ... There
is little exaggeration in an AJCongress lawyer’s claim that ‘many of these laws
were actually written in the offices of Jewish agencies by Jewish staff people,
introduced by Jewish legislators and pressured into being by Jewish voters’ (Lev-
ering-Lewis, 1984: 94)” (CofC: 256).
As with Jewish involvement in immigration
policy and a great many other instances of Jewish political and intellectual
activity in both modern and premodern times [CofC: Ch. 6], the intergroup
relations movement often worked to minimize overt Jewish involvement (e.g.,
Svonkin, 1997: 45, 51, 65, 71–72). (CofC: 257)
Particularly relevant for the eventual triumph of anti-restrictionism is the material
in CofC on Jewish activism in creating the context of the 1965 law in the sec-
tions on Jewish activism from 1945 to 1965 in opposition to the national-origins
provisions of the 1924 and 1952 laws (CofC: 273–292). This material shows quite
clearly that the wider context of the 1965 law was fundamentally shaped by Jew-
ish activism.
Jews and Jewish organizations led the intellec-
tual effort to deny the importance of racial and ethnic differences in human affairs.
The Jewish role in creating the intellectual context of the 1965 immigration law
relied on the success of the Boasian movement in anthropology in shaping academic
views on race by dominating the American Anthropological Association since the
1920s (CofC: Ch. 2; see above). For example, “in message and purpose, [Boas’s
anthropology] was an explicitly antiracist science” (Frank, 1997: 741).
By 1965 Senator Jacob Javits (Congressional Record 111, 1965: 24469) could
confidently announce to the Senate during the debate on the immigration bill
that “both the dictates of our consciences as well as the precepts of sociolo-
gists tell us that immigration, as it exists in the national origins quota system,
is wrong and without any basis in reason or fact for we know better than to say
that one man is better than another because of the color of his skin.” The intel-
lectual revolution and its translation into public policy had been completed.
he anti-restrictionist strategy of Oscar Handlin, the prominent Harvard
historian and public intellectual discussed in more detail below, included altering
the views of social scientists to the effect “that it was possible and necessary to dis-
tinguish among the ‘races’ of immigrants that clamored for admission to the United
States” (Handlin, 1952: 4)—using scare quotes for ‘races,’ clearly reflecting Boasian views on race and undermining any intellectual basis for white ethnocentrism
Petersen (1955) cited a group of predominantly Jewish
social scientists whose works, beginning with Horace Kallen’s (1915, 1924) plea for
a multicultural, pluralistic society, “constitute the beginning of a scholarly legitimi-
zation of the different immigration policy that will perhaps one day become law”
(86), including Harvard historian Richard Hofstadter who was influential in creating
the image of the populists of the West and South (whose support was critical for the
restrictionists in 1924 and 1952) as irrational anti-Semites
The New York Intellectuals (CofC: Ch. 6) were paradigmatic of this urban elite.
For example, the highly influential left-wing journal Partisan Review was a princi-
ple showcase of “the New York Intellectuals, a group dominated by editors and con-
tributors with a Jewish ethnic identity and a deep alienation from American politi-
cal and cultural institutions
Joyce (2019) describes a campaign centered around Samuel H. Flow-
erman, Research Director of the AJCommittee and affiliated with the Frankfurt
School’s Institute for Social Research (see CofC: Ch. 5), to influence public opin-
ion in the American media after World War II. Flowerman co-edited with Max
Horkheimer (director of the Institute for Social Research) the highly influential
series Studies in Prejudice, published by the AJCommittee. Flowerman brought
together a network of Jewish intellectuals and social scientists, many with prominent
positions in universities and the media
(at a time when the Hollywood studios, all
the American television networks, and influential newspapers [e.g., the New York
Times and Washington Post] were owned by Jews). This effort was aimed at domi-
nating American mass communications in order to “actively reshape ingroup stand-
ards—thus reforming peer group pressures to become antagonistic to ingroup ethno-
centrism”;
it was “an extensive Jewish joint enterprise in which the unlocking and
alteration of White American public opinion was the goal (Joyce, 2019: 6, 11; see,
e.g., Flowerman, 1947).
i can keep going by i dont want to appear as if i am trying to gish gallop.
 

Attachments

Back