r/antiwork - Yes, it's exactly what it sounds like.

How will society function without jobs?


  • Total voters
    900
  • Poll closed .
And frankly, why the fuck would someone who clearly can't do public speaking start a podcast of all things?!
That's the irony, this guy LOVES public speaking, and does it constantly, loudly & proudly at any given opportunity to any podcast big or small, just for the air-time and to make people listen to his fetishes and gaming interests. Check my post on page 49, for a supposedly socially-awkward autistic he has a LOT to say to anyone willing to listen. He's part of an ongoing 4-person gaming podcast and is a guest on at least 4, and I'm still finding more.
 
Blog
"Author: Doreen
A trans and non-binary writer living in NH who loves puns, video games and doesn't much care for work!"

Patreon

University Page
(The resume from that site is REALLY WORTH LOOKING AT!!!)

She’s hella fine 😂😂😂😂
 
Nobody who mods a subreddit will ever have an intelligent thing to say, much less somebody like this. Interestingly the sub itself knows this because they actually held a vote where "don't talk to FOX at fucking all" got the most support. For what it's worth it doesn't matter what your "cause" is, never talk to the media. Especially right wing media. If you don't manufacture bombs or hate immigrants they're just trying to sensationalize everything to the greatest extent of their ability.

Of course, nobody who's "cause" revolves around reddit matters anyway.

If FOX was actually interested in working conditions in the US they'd interview a union organizer or somebody who actually, ya know, FUCKING DOES SOMETHING, but they didn't, they interviewed an autistic grad student. Because they aren't trying to be objective, and this mod is a complete fucking moron for even thinking this was ever going to go well.

Anyway, further proof that the left needs to purge itself of anybody who doesn't hold an actual 9-5. Powerlevel. I was briefly a member of DSA. I say briefly because unlike most socialists in the US I actually talk to people outside of twitter and interact with actual working class people, and I know these idiots don't and actually look down on them to a truly significant degree. Socialists, despite a history of mass murder, in the US are way, way, too accepting of narcissistic twats. In Greece or Latin America this type of person would get the shit kicked out of them and thrown out of the building like Marx intended.
Agreed. There are genuine points for unions to reform the way work is performed, especially in America, but LARPing as a Communist in your mother's basement walking dogs all day doesn't help the image. I bet FOX absolutely loved that they could use that person as a political scapegoat to disregard any pro-union sentiments, because that's exactly what that embarrassment of a person is going to do to the movement. It's not a good look for the left, at all.
 
All those years of working on a janny's salary while calling yourself 'antiwork' only to fatally embarrass your entire 'movement' in front of the Tucker Carlson JV team in a matter of minutes :story: I'd say this is so perfect it has to be some kind of Fox News gayop but I can also see a groupthinking cabal of reddit jannies genuinely believing any one of them could easily go on Fox News and speak truth to power to all the boomercons like in their fantasies and Fox was only too happy to oblige.
 
Blog
"Author: Doreen
A trans and non-binary writer living in NH who loves puns, video games and doesn't much care for work!"

Patreon

University Page
(The resume from that site is REALLY WORTH LOOKING AT!!!)


findingdory192@gmail.com on the resume...

This guy hasn't done a single day of graft in his entire fucking life I'll bet.
 
If FOX was actually interested in working conditions in the US they'd interview a union organizer or somebody who actually, ya know, FUCKING DOES SOMETHING, but they didn't, they interviewed an autistic grad student. Because they aren't trying to be objective, and this mod is a complete fucking moron for even thinking this was ever going to go well.
Normally I'd agree that the interview was low hanging fruit, but what are you supposed to do when the leaders of the movements you're criticizing are all sexually degenerate retards?
 
Fox hates these people and selects for the worst representative and since you're more inclined to view them your perspective is skewed. Maybe. It is reddit after all
Yup. Fox specifically asked for this guy apparently. It's not hard to see why. Autistic (easy to cow into submission, likely to say stupid shit), trans (automatically disregarded by their viewership), grad student (easy to make fun of), "anti work" (easy to call entitled).

If you're on the left and fox actually wants to talk to you then you're an embarrassment and they know it. Put all political differences aside here, FOX is just objectively biased. In fact I don't think that goes far enough, usually it's just straight up propaganda. They aren't subtle about it. And let's also acknowledge that reddit doesn't matter and the only reason FOX would talk about this at all is because they want to give their boomer viewership something else to be angry about. Never, for an instant, was anybody involved in decision making at FOX doing this because they wanted to have an actual discussion about organized labor in the US. This segment was greenlit because their entire business model is manufactured outrage.

FOX doesn't interview people who are actually articulate on the left you'll notice. You're not gonna see Yanis Varoufakis or Noam Chomsky or whoever on there, only cringey douchebags like this. Love or hate those two, they can at least form a complete sentence and give you reasonably articulate reasons for their beliefs.

Fox doesn't want that.
 
Fox used autism to it's advantage. The mods failed to see any danger signs before accepting the invitation to appear. Their tism brains couldn't understand anything but attention they would gain.

The Fox host handled it like a true gentleman. 10/10!
I don't think anybody was expecting him to be unclean and not once look at the camera. These "people" spend so much time watching streamers that they thought this is how you do a cable new interview. It's so funny, man! How much of a hermit do you have to be to think that was an acceptable performance?
 
Yup. Fox specifically asked for this guy apparently. It's not hard to see why. Autistic (easy to cow into submission, likely to say stupid shit), trans (automatically disregarded by their viewership), grad student (easy to make fun of), "anti work" (easy to call entitled).

If you're on the left and fox actually wants to talk to you then you're an embarrassment and they know it. Put all political differences aside here, FOX is just objectively biased. In fact I don't think that goes far enough, usually it's just straight up propaganda. They aren't subtle about it. And let's also acknowledge that reddit doesn't matter and the only reason FOX would talk about this at all is because they want to give their boomer viewership something else to be angry about. Never, for an instant, was anybody involved in decision making at FOX doing this because they wanted to have an actual discussion about organized labor in the US. This segment was greenlit because their entire business model is manufactured outrage.

FOX doesn't interview people who are actually articulate on the left you'll notice. You're not gonna see Yanis Varoufakis or Noam Chomsky or whoever on there, only cringey douchebags like this. Love or hate those two, they can at least form a complete sentence and give you reasonably articulate reasons for their beliefs.

Fox doesn't want that.
I get that you're seething about Fox acting like a news organization, but who were they supposed to interview besides the leader? If all the workers revolution groups are headed by affirmative action hires and sex pests, you'd be wise to try and get someone semi-normal into a PR position where they can handle media interactions. Kind of like having a token white guy in your all black group of friends so there's someone that can talk to the police when they eventually get called.
 
Normally I'd agree that the interview was low hanging fruit, but what are you supposed to do when the leaders of the movements you're criticizing are all sexually degenerate retards?
The more you get involved in politics the more you realize it's like that across the board. The only people insane enough to think they should be the ones who tell society what to do are naturally a bunch of degenerate maniacs. Left, right, doesn't matter: if you actually think you deserve a say over the lives of others you are fucked in the head. This guy for example seriously believed he was smart, articulate, and nuanced enough to survive a fox news hit piece. He probably thought beforehand that he was gonna totally own them through sheer force of brainpower and wit. He was going to come out of this a hero who spoke truth to power and made all of fox's geriatric viewership see the light of socialism.

Politics, from top to bottom, attracts people with no common sense, no understanding of people, and a total lack of self awareness.

I've had more productive conversations about politics while hammered in bars with construction workers then I ever did hanging out with activists, never mind listening to mainstream politicians of either party open their stupid mouths. If you dedicate your fucking life to politics you are stupid and irresponsible, full stop. No sane person thinks they deserve any sort of power whatsoever.
 
I never thought about it before until now; these are the lazy fuckwits people are referring to when mentioning 'lazy people that don't want to work'. I thought it was drug addicts, welfare pigs, black people...but they meant these shitheels.

I hate troons even more now because their genuine existence is what's making my life harder.
Women can't handle the levels of work a man can, and men aren't supposed to believe that men and women are different, so they have to embrace the same sensitivities that a woman has and distrust that men can handle more. It's not a coincidence that the spokesman troon can't stand to do any actual work.
"This individual had past trauma, from previous relationships, that caused emotional and physical distance between us over the course of months. This led to my needs going unmet, which led to masturbation as an unhealthy coping mechanism."
Does the way that this is worded imply that this relationship was part of a polycule? That their relationship was impacted by the result of another relationship that had happened simultaneously?
 
Yup. Fox specifically asked for this guy apparently. It's not hard to see why. Autistic (easy to cow into submission, likely to say stupid shit), trans (automatically disregarded by their viewership), grad student (easy to make fun of), "anti work" (easy to call entitled).
If Fox's background checkers googled Doreen Reed and found even one of the dozens of podcasts I did, they had a very clear psych profile and script ready for an attention-starved and clumsy mark to talk circles around. This guy craves screentime and has dozens, probably hundreds of hours of discussions and monologues available, and all of it is pointless media & hobby material; imagine an even-less charismatic Asmongold in a dress that only likes talking about solo experiences and rocking in their chair like a restless mongoloid.
 
Back