r/ForeverUnwanted - Move over ForeverAlone Cause You're Not Hard Enough!

Woah, an intersection between two threads, Forever Unwanted (aka the true loveshys) and the Slatons!
 

Attachments

  • intersection of slatons and forever unwanted.jpg
    intersection of slatons and forever unwanted.jpg
    248.2 KB · Views: 411
  • intersection of slatons and forever unwanted 2.jpg
    intersection of slatons and forever unwanted 2.jpg
    201.3 KB · Views: 379
  • intersection of slatons and forever unwanted 3.jpg
    intersection of slatons and forever unwanted 3.jpg
    336.3 KB · Views: 363
"All women like rough sex see 50 Shades"

Has this guy even seen the kind of chicks that unironically like 50SoG? They (or at least the younger ones) are usually vapid bitches anyway, what did he expect?

I often wonder how these guys come to believe that all women function the exact same way and how they come to the conclusion that women control everything somehow.
As for the whole Slaton thing above, they seem dumb enough to not see through the commentors' stupidity if they think that anyone who isn't a degenerate fetishist would want that tub of lard.

I mean, you have your regular chubby chasers, your weird-ish fat fetishists, and then you have downright bestiality.
 
Last edited:
A lot of the BDSM community doesn't like 50 Shades, since the woman is basically exceptional and there isn't proper consent, quite apart from the hilariously awful writing.
The only women who like 50SoG are usually old married housewives. Young women usually hate that book. Turns out women aren't all the same when it comes to what they like to read and what turns them on.
The reason most people hate the book/movie is because it's boring. It's just a lot of awkward soft-core erotica occasionally interrupted by characters no one cares about doing other things no one cares about. Its prose and narrative style isn't even nearly as bad as people think. It's edgier version of those trashy romance books like Kiss of the Highlander. That's all.

These loveshy spergs are just getting their beliefs about sex and romance from media, which is nothing new. It's the main reason they think you can/should get a girlfriend by being the quirky male friend who she eventually realizes is perfect for her.
 
These loveshy spergs are just getting their beliefs about sex and romance from media, which is nothing new. It's the main reason they think you can/should get a girlfriend by being the quirky male friend who she eventually realizes is perfect for her.

Well, it would be a better plan than be the creepy, weird asshole who makes them buy extra locks and hire a security company to install an alarm.
 
God damn that post is exceptional. I think their heads would explode if we showed them couples where one person is way more attractive than the other which happens all the time.
They know it happens and they have an excuse for it. Usually that the guy is loaded and he's getting cucked by Chad while he's at work.
 
These loveshy spergs are just getting their beliefs about sex and romance from media, which is nothing new. It's the main reason they think you can/should get a girlfriend by being the quirky male friend who she eventually realizes is perfect for her.

John Hughes has a lot to answer for.
 
The reason most people hate the book/movie is because it's boring. It's just a lot of awkward soft-core erotica occasionally interrupted by characters no one cares about doing other things no one cares about. Its prose and narrative style isn't even nearly as bad as people think. It's edgier version of those trashy romance books like Kiss of the Highlander. That's all.

These loveshy spergs are just getting their beliefs about sex and romance from media, which is nothing new. It's the main reason they think you can/should get a girlfriend by being the quirky male friend who she eventually realizes is perfect for her.

So they're taking the Chris Chan approach to sex education, because that worked out so well for him.
 
Back