I would really like to know why you think pressuring Ryulong to step aside, if successful, would improve the situation.
If you aren't aware, the GishGallopers have one of their absurd "Ops" here:
They don't intend to stop with Ryulong. They will campaign until all the "anti-GG" editors are removed because they feel this will allow them to step in and rewrite the article to their satisfaction. If you continue to pressure Ryulong to leave, and he does, they will be vastly encouraged that their tactics are working, and will redouble their efforts. And Wikipedia will be fending them, and their lists of citations for Youtube personalities who agree with them, off for years to come.
Once the GangrenousGrubbies have chased away their current batch of targets, with your baffling assistance, which good editors do you intend to suggest should willingly step forward into the fire of trying to keep the article in line with Wikipedia's core precepts? Why should any editor agree to work on that page, or any other hotly contested page, if this utter lack of support is what they can expect from you when the flying monkeys attack? It's unworthy.
If you are under the impression that GG will calm down and drop the stick if Ryulong leaves, you are as wrong as wrong can be. If you help them in this, they will be plaguing the Gamergate article, and the Anita Sarkeesian article, and the Zoe Quinn article, and the Brianna Wu article, and any other article they set their sights on, for years. Possibly longer.
I implore you to read up on what this group has been doing and the lengths to which they are willing to go to secure some victory, ANY victory, no matter how small and stupid, for their lost cause. If you give them that victory, you are throwing members of Wikipedia's volunteer editing corps to be devoured by rabid wolves, which is an exceedingly poor reward for a great deal of difficult, frustrating, unpaid service to Wikipedia.
Please reconsider.
