Culture R. Kelly and XXXTentacion Pulled From Spotify Playlists for ‘Hateful Conduct’ - The musical clensing begins | Update 1: Apple Music and Pandora follow suit | Update 2: LOL JK

https://archive.is/8ZLxy

By Joe Coscarelli
May 10, 2018

R. Kelly’s music will no longer be promoted by Spotify and has been removed from all official playlists and recommendation features on the streaming service, the company announced Thursday, adding its voice to the growing chorus attempting to hold the singer responsible after decades of accusations of sexual misconduct.

“We don’t censor content because of an artist’s or creator’s behavior, but we want our editorial decisions — what we choose to program — to reflect our values,” Spotify said in a statement. “When an artist or creator does something that is especially harmful or hateful, it may affect the ways we work with or support that artist or creator.”

Last week, the Time’s Up organization, which formed around the #MeToo movement to support victims of sexual abuse, joined a grass-roots #MuteRKelly campaign that has called on his record label and concert promoter, as well as local venues, radio stations and streaming services to cease its support of the platinum-selling R&B singer.

[Never miss a pop music story: Sign up for our weekly newsletter, Louder.]

R. Kelly, who for years has faced lawsuits and news reports alleging sexual coercion and abuse of young girls and women, has denied the accusations. He is not currently facing any criminal charges and was acquitted in 2008 in a child pornography case that took six years to bring to trial. His management team has called the recent Time’s Up campaign an “attempted public lynching of a black man.”

Spotify’s announcement regarding R. Kelly’s music came as the company debuted a new policy regarding “hate content and hateful conduct.” It defines such content as any that “expressly and principally promotes, advocates, or incites hatred or violence against a group or individual based on characteristics, including, race, religion, gender identity, sex, ethnicity, nationality, sexual orientation, veteran status, or disability.”

The streaming service also noted that it has “thought long and hard about how to handle content that is not hate content itself, but is principally made by artists or other creators who have demonstrated hateful conduct personally.”

A representative for Spotify said that in addition to R. Kelly, the chart-topping rapper and singer XXXTentacion, who is facing charges in Florida that include aggravated battery of a pregnant woman and witness tampering, was also removed from playlists as of Thursday. As recently as Wednesday, XXXTentacion was featured on the popular Rap Caviar playlist.

Universal Music, which oversees XXXTentacion’s distributor, Caroline, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. R. Kelly’s label, RCA Records, a division of Sony Music, did not immediately comment either.

R. Kelly currently has one publicly scheduled tour date, on Friday in Greensboro, N.C. A representative for the venue, the Greensboro Coliseum Complex, said on Thursday that the show had not been affected by the protest effort, and tickets are still available via Ticketmaster.

Though Spotify has previously removed songs from white supremacist acts, its new policy represents a more hands-on approach to editorial decisions such as the content of playlists and the algorithmic recommendations of features like Discover Weekly. Asked last August about its policy regarding artists charged with violent crimes, Spotify said: “As a general matter, Spotify does not alter its content library based on the actions of the individuals behind the content. We hope that Spotify’s users will use their own discretion to determine exactly what music they listen to.”

Now, Spotify said the decision to no longer promote an artist would be made on a case-by-case basis by an internal committee led by Jonathan Prince, the company’s vice president of content and marketplace policy. The company said it had also partnered with advocacy groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center, Glaad and the Anti-Defamation League to help identify hateful content.

“When we look at promotion, we look at issues around hateful conduct, where you have an artist or another creator who has done something off-platform that is so particularly out of line with our values, egregious, in a way that it becomes something that we don’t want to associate ourselves with,” Mr. Prince told Billboard.

However, Spotify noted in its announcement, “It’s important to remember that cultural standards and sensitivities vary widely. That means there will always be content that is acceptable in some circumstances, but is offensive in others, and we will always look at the entire context.”

While I agree with not promoting people like R. Kelly, where does this end? Will Spotify stop promoting artists for having different political views than the curation team, the staff, or the shareholders?

UPDATE:

Apple Music and Pandora have also joined the list of people removing the music of Mr. Robert Kelly from their curated playlists etc.

https://archive.is/LaR5O
 
Last edited:
While I agree with not promoting people like R. Kelly,

I don't agree with not promoting R. Kelly, and I especially don't agree with delivery platforms doing it like they give a fuck about morality. The art is not the artist.

Will Spotify stop promoting artists for having different political views than the curation team, the staff, or the shareholders?

Probably, yes.
 
I mean, right now Spotify's doing it to a pedophile and a wife-beater. If they start targeting artists because they disagree with them, then it's a cause for concern.
They're a tech startup in the current year. Thinking this will stop them is extremely :optimistic:. There are tons of artists they could drop, but I bet they won't because they don't have the negative publicity surrounding them like Kelly. Why haven't they gone after Snoop for being a murderer? Or both him and Ice T for being actual pimps by their own admission? Mystikals gone to jail for rape twice and he's still on there.
 
Definitely an interesting precedent. They won't edit the songs, but will edit which songs they feature on their service. And this isn't the first time they've done it, as they've already removed racist white music & now are following through on policies semi-equally. It will be interesting to see if there's a ripple to the other streaming music services & consequently streaming video services.

Ultimately fans are going to follow their artist to whichever site has the content they want, so companies are going to start waffling back in forth to follow the dollar.
 
They're just pulling the artist from playlist they use to promote artists. You can still search and listen to them, but for how much longer? How long until they're scrubbed from search results and you can only find their content by other means?
 
TBH if I was someone like Snoop or any other of the old school rappers I wouldn’t care. There’s plenty of other streamers out there who can separate the art from the artist and a lot of them have been wise with money or have other businesses, so who cares if Spotify quits promoting those guys?
 
yes. Unless the owner of the recording is blocking streaming (Jay Z, Aaliyah), its on there.

Since that's the case, I say R. Kelly and XXXTenacious have a pretty solid case of, "Either you keep our songs or get rid of all of us"

But then likely the racist card will get thrown and then who knows what'll happen.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: _Wice
Definitely. Jay Z keeps his songs off other platforms to have people use Tidal (he owns a stake in it). Aaliyah is not on streaming due to the copyright owner (her uncle) not wanting to do anything with new music delivery methods and personal issues stemming from her death.
 
I don't agree with not promoting R. Kelly, and I especially don't agree with delivery platforms doing it like they give a fuck about morality. The art is not the artist.



Probably, yes.
Idk. There is a huuuuuuuuuuuuuge leap from banning someone for being a child rapist to banning someone for disagreeing with their politics. I'm not upset.
 
From http://www.complex.com/music/2018/0...fy-playlists-under-new-hateful-conduct-policy

When reached for comment, a representative for XXXTentacion shared a list of artists and asked, "Will Spotify remove all the artists listed below from playlists?"

Gene Simmons of KISS (sexual battery)
Red Hot Chili Peppers (sexual assault)
David Bowie (rape allegations)
Real Estate (sexual misconduct)
Backstreet Boys (Nick Carter - sexual assault)
Ozzy Osbourne (domestic abuse)
Ace of Base (Founding member is a Neo-Nazi)
Seal (sexual battery)
Jimmy Page of Led Zeppelin (rape of minor)
James Brown (domestic violence)
Michael Jackson (sexual abuse of minor)
Miles Davis (domestic abuse)
Sid Vicious of Sex Pistols (domestic violence/murder)
6ix9ine (sexual misconduct w/ minor)
Nelly (sexual assault)
Miguel (sexual misconduct)
Trey Songz (domestic violence)
Fabolous (domestic violence)
Dr. Dre (domestic abuse)
They have a point.

EDIT: I don't agree with removing these artists, but it is still a valid point.
 
Last edited:
While I agree with not promoting people like R. Kelly, where does this end? Will Spotify stop promoting artists for having different political views than the curation team, the staff, or the shareholders?

It doesn't end, because people like you are okay with wiping out artistic work because of the artists' personal lives. You asked for it, enjoy!
 
Back