- Joined
- Oct 2, 2020
Ron Paul supporters lmao. Here's an anti-racemixing argument that should appeal to that type:
So basically by diluting your Ron Paul supporting blood you're literally producing an increasingly slavish population. Not that it's so much about support as having the capacity as an individual to act collectively (and having the affinity for that collective) such that it's possible to grant individuals their due liberties.
If those conditions aren't met, and you try to force it anyway, you get the increasingly shitty situation we have now, where onerous and undeserved burdens are increasingly put on the noble to raise up the ignoble, (but of course the talmuds and other mercantile elites not only isolate themselves from this burden, but profit off of it. In fact, causality is the reverse: the whole thing is a post hoc rationalization of this profiteering, and it's designed to never succeed except at increasing this profiteering or destroying the host).
The psyops of individualism and libertarianism: The more someone naively tries to be "free" as just one man or one family the more they must rely on massive impersonal managerial structures of middle men, and the more they must give whatever amount of sovereignty they have for the luxury of renting their possessions from a selection provided by those who share nothing in common with them. Rather than this farce, it seems the maximum individual sovereignty is achieved by a collection of related families whereby the many necessary functions each man could not hope to fulfill on his own are had by people with an agreeable sense of what is right and beautiful. The most significant aspects of this sense are indisputably rooted in the blood, as best seen in the capacity for individual sovereignty of which a given collective is capable. The bug men of continental Asia stand in clear contrast to the European. It's not hard to see that this quality, this very capacity for individual sovereignty, ironically a rhetorical bastion of our anti-racialist regime, is itself diminished by the mixing of the noble with the base. That is to say, while preaching for liberty they breed for servility, all while conditioning the servile to be appalled by any suggestion that we act to the contrary.
So basically by diluting your Ron Paul supporting blood you're literally producing an increasingly slavish population. Not that it's so much about support as having the capacity as an individual to act collectively (and having the affinity for that collective) such that it's possible to grant individuals their due liberties.
If those conditions aren't met, and you try to force it anyway, you get the increasingly shitty situation we have now, where onerous and undeserved burdens are increasingly put on the noble to raise up the ignoble, (but of course the talmuds and other mercantile elites not only isolate themselves from this burden, but profit off of it. In fact, causality is the reverse: the whole thing is a post hoc rationalization of this profiteering, and it's designed to never succeed except at increasing this profiteering or destroying the host).
Last edited: