Crime Rampant shoplifting leads to another Walgreens closing in S.F.

Rampant shoplifting leads to another Walgreens closing in S.F.​

https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea...fting-leads-to-another-Walgreens-15654730.php (https://archive.vn/zQQH9)

After months of seeing its shelves repeatedly cleaned out by brazen shoplifters, the Walgreens at Van Ness and Eddy in San Francisco is getting ready to close.

“The last day is Nov. 11,” Walgreens spokesman Phil Caruso said.

The drugstore, which serves many older people who live in the Opera Plaza area, is the seventh Walgreens to close in the city since 2019.

“All of us knew it was coming. Whenever we go in there, they always have problems with shoplifters, ” said longtime customer Sebastian Luke, who lives a block away and is a frequent customer who has been posting photos of the thefts for months. The other day, Luke photographed a man casually clearing a couple of shelves and placing the goods into a backpack.

“I feel sorry for the clerks, they are regularly being verbally assaulted,” Luke said. “The clerks say there is nothing they can do. They say Walgreens’ policy is to not get involved. They don’t want anyone getting injured or getting sued, so the guys just keep coming in and taking whatever they want.”

For security reasons, Walgreens declined to provide details on their security policies, but Caruso did say that “the safety of our team members and customers is our top concern.”

A recent trip to the store revealed aisle after aisle of empty or near-empty shelves. Beauty supplies appear to be a favored target.

Most of the remaining products were locked behind plastic theft guards, which have become increasingly common at drugstores in recent years.

But at Van Ness Avenue and Eddy Street, even the jugs of clothing detergent on display were looped with locked anti-theft cables.

When a clerk was asked where all the goods had gone, he said, “Go ask the people in the alleys, they have it all.”

Homeless encampments are common in the neighborhood, including two just across Eddy Street.

No sooner had the clerk spoken than a man wearing a virus mask walked in, emptied two shelves of snacks into a bag, then headed back for the door.

As he walked past the checkout line, a customer called out, “Sure you don’t want a drink with that?”

Just across busy Van Ness and down a block, a competing CVS pharmacy was fully stocked.

The difference? The CVS had a security guard at the door.

“Up there, they are closer to the Tenderloin. It’s the Wild West,” said a CVS clerk who was standing with the security guard.

The homeless encampments and the thefts at the Walgreens were front and center at a neighborhood town hall at St. Mary’s Cathedral in March.

Police responded by placing two officers and a squad car outside the store at the corner of Eddy and Van Ness.

“Everyone was happy,” Luke said.

But as the pandemic shutdown dragged on, the officers were needed elsewhere. And a short time later, the thieves returned in full force.

Why not?

Under California law, theft of less than $950 in goods is treated as a nonviolent misdemeanor. The maximum sentence for petty theft is six months in county jail. But most of the time the suspect is released with conditions attached.

The Van Ness location is at least the third Walgreens to close in the city in the past year. The Walgreens at 16th and Mission streets closed in December. The Walgreens at 730 Market St. closed in March.

It’s hard to pin down how much the market forces that prompted the closure of 200 Walgreens nationwide was a factor in the local closures and how much theft contributed — or if it was a combination of reasons.

In February, the local news website Hoodline reported that an employee at the Market Street store said the store couldn’t cope with the shoplifting, which was costing the company $1,000 a day.

“Organized retail crime in San Francisco has increased the challenge for all retail, and Walgreens is not immune to that,” company spokesman Caruso said.

Jay Cheng, public policy director for the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, said the rising incidents of shoplifting and worsening street conditions have made it difficult for all neighborhood retail stores to continue to operate in San Francisco.

“We’ve already seen California Attorney General Xavier Becerra uncover a major Bay Area retail theft ring with over $8 million in stolen merchandise,” Cheng said. “These crimes make it dangerous for businesses, employees and customers, and need to be addressed.”

Some stores have hired private security firms or off-duty police officers to deter would-be thieves.

But security is expensive and can cost upward of $1,000 a day.

Add in the losses from theft, and the cost of doing business can become too high for a store to stay open. As for the customers at the Van Ness Walgreens, their prescriptions will be handled by the Walgreens at 1301 Franklin St.

At least for as long as it stays open.
 
misread as "rampant shooting"

Edit:
The cop in that last video was worse than useless, he seemed to the situation worse.
LOL. that's a security guard. that's about all they can do.


Give them a gun, see what happens.

I can't imagine being a security guard with so many restrictions.

why not, it's not like you can legally do more than that guy.


My car got broken into in some strip mall parking lot in front of a parked security car and the thatsnotmyjob behind the wheel didn't even do shit. didn't even bother to call the police. She didn't see it, she was doing her job, etc.
 
Who knew that removing all penalties for criminal action would result in rampant abuse by bad faith actors? Of course, if the DA was serious about not doing their job he wouldn't prosecute the employees when they crack a shoplifter's skull and toss them in the dumpster where they belong. So it could be a self correcting problem, except these SJW, Soros funded DAs are intent on ripping society apart by enacting anarcho-tyranny and completely reversing the aim of law enforcement.

The law won't be used to stop criminals, but it will be used to punish citizens for trying to enforce order. People want order and justice, and if the government refuses to deliver on their end of the deal, folks will start to wonder why they gave up a monopoly on violence to the state. Once people start to do that, it isn't very long before the entire social contract dissolves and people realize that there are only one or two cops for every 5,000-10,000 citizens.

If the DA were dragged out of his office and torn apart by a mob the city would be better for it, and he would deserve it.
 
Last edited:
For anyone who isn't a CA resident or in the know; I believe it was at the state legislature level that any theft that's under ~$900 dollars is treated as a misdemeanor. So even if the staff were to call the cops and the cops actually show up, the most they could do is issue a fine and let them go; and since most cops know it's bullshit, they don't even bother showing up because it's not worth the effort when there's other stuff going on.
 
For security reasons, Walgreens declined to provide details on their security policies, but Caruso did say that “the safety of our team members and customers is our top concern.”

I used to be a manager at Walgreens. Their policy to deter shoplifting is by using ECS (Excellent Costumer Service). It's basically what all corporate stores do; you see somebody slipping merchandise into their coat or pocket/purse/jacket/bag/etc. you approach them with a basket, and say something like "hey, it looks like you're getting more than you can carry, here's a basket." It's a way to let them know that we know what you're doing without accusing them (because that's a lawsuit waiting to happen).
 
I used to be a manager at Walgreens. Their policy to deter shoplifting is by using ECS (Excellent Costumer Service). It's basically what all corporate stores do; you see somebody slipping merchandise into their coat or pocket/purse/jacket/bag/etc. you approach them with a basket, and say something like "hey, it looks like you're getting more than you can carry, here's a basket." It's a way to let them know that we know what you're doing without accusing them (because that's a lawsuit waiting to happen).
That's pretty fucking soft, but I'll admit most companies have gotten soft. In the old days at Wal-Mart, when the undercover spots a shoplifter, they call it in; then a manager on duty, and undercover stalk them and lay in wait for them to exit the store and then ambush them with a "We know you're stealing shit, you can either come with us or not." Being a cart pusher meant I was also part-time loss prevention and when they were tailing someone, they'd tell us to stake out the front or garden section. We'd see them get approached and if they ran, we were legally allowed to chase them anywhere on Wal-Mart property in an attempt to retrieve said items (you make it to the sidewalk and you're safe). While I don't know the specifics, pretty sure they changed that after enough people got hurt from either stabbings, shootings, or bad falls. Now-a-days, if they keep walking, no one is allowed to make an attempt to stop them; but again, I doubt people want to get injured over a couple of moon pies or shit tier cosmetics.
 
So when do people start looting and burning the gated communities?

If there is a guard shack, probably never.

Mentioning gates, if you ever need to bypass one in an emergency, method 2 with the pan works great and it doesn't require something as big as he's using.

 
That's pretty fucking soft, but I'll admit most companies have gotten soft. In the old days at Wal-Mart, when the undercover spots a shoplifter, they call it in; then a manager on duty, and undercover stalk them and lay in wait for them to exit the store and then ambush them with a "We know you're stealing shit, you can either come with us or not." Being a cart pusher meant I was also part-time loss prevention and when they were tailing someone, they'd tell us to stake out the front or garden section. We'd see them get approached and if they ran, we were legally allowed to chase them anywhere on Wal-Mart property in an attempt to retrieve said items (you make it to the sidewalk and you're safe). While I don't know the specifics, pretty sure they changed that after enough people got hurt from either stabbings, shootings, or bad falls. Now-a-days, if they keep walking, no one is allowed to make an attempt to stop them; but again, I doubt people want to get injured over a couple of moon pies or shit tier cosmetics.
Yeah, but it's almost exclusively niggers that steal so brazenly from stores, and we all know what happens to people that hold niggers accountable for their actions.
 
Yeah, but it's almost exclusively niggers that steal so brazenly from stores, and we all know what happens to people that hold niggers accountable for their actions.
Oh I know. One of the first things my mom noticed when she came to visit me years back was how the only thing locked up in my local Wal-Mart was spray paint, guns/bullets, and cosmetics. Meanwhile at her local Wal-Mart; while "everything" would be hyperbole, it's easier to say "everything." Certain types of pet food, baby formula, and all sorts of shit get locked behind safety glass. The main difference between our two localities; the vibrant diversity.
 
This'll be the end of self service shopping. They'll have to go back to the old way where the entrance opens up to a big counter and you give the shopkeeper a list of the stuff you want so he can get it from the back.
It wouldn't even be that hard with the way digitalization has been going; or God forbid, Amazon gets even bigger and becomes the lead grocery chain with their cashless system. You can also do shit like online express that some stores do, where an order comes in online and paid for; then some gopher gets everything and you pull up and they bring it out to you.
 
Bring back public shame as punishment.

Lol they have. They’ve just redefined common sense, reason, civility, and conscientiousness as shameful, and magical thinking, hyperemotionality, permanent and unrelenting hostility, and rejection of the entire concept of behaving responsibly as the only socially acceptable ways to think and behave.

If you are NOT issuing rape and death threats against the enemy, if you are NOT burning things down, if you are NOT refusing to listen to different opinions, if you are not working to deplatform anyone not fervently on their side, if you DO think people minding their own business should be allowed to continue doing so, if you are not actively harassing dissenters, you are evil and fair game. Basically, name a value that has contributed to Western democracies being successful. If you aren’t against it, you are now a moral failure to be publicly shamed.
 
Last edited:
Back