Crime Rampant shoplifting leads to another Walgreens closing in S.F.

Rampant shoplifting leads to another Walgreens closing in S.F.​

https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea...fting-leads-to-another-Walgreens-15654730.php (https://archive.vn/zQQH9)

After months of seeing its shelves repeatedly cleaned out by brazen shoplifters, the Walgreens at Van Ness and Eddy in San Francisco is getting ready to close.

“The last day is Nov. 11,” Walgreens spokesman Phil Caruso said.

The drugstore, which serves many older people who live in the Opera Plaza area, is the seventh Walgreens to close in the city since 2019.

“All of us knew it was coming. Whenever we go in there, they always have problems with shoplifters, ” said longtime customer Sebastian Luke, who lives a block away and is a frequent customer who has been posting photos of the thefts for months. The other day, Luke photographed a man casually clearing a couple of shelves and placing the goods into a backpack.

“I feel sorry for the clerks, they are regularly being verbally assaulted,” Luke said. “The clerks say there is nothing they can do. They say Walgreens’ policy is to not get involved. They don’t want anyone getting injured or getting sued, so the guys just keep coming in and taking whatever they want.”

For security reasons, Walgreens declined to provide details on their security policies, but Caruso did say that “the safety of our team members and customers is our top concern.”

A recent trip to the store revealed aisle after aisle of empty or near-empty shelves. Beauty supplies appear to be a favored target.

Most of the remaining products were locked behind plastic theft guards, which have become increasingly common at drugstores in recent years.

But at Van Ness Avenue and Eddy Street, even the jugs of clothing detergent on display were looped with locked anti-theft cables.

When a clerk was asked where all the goods had gone, he said, “Go ask the people in the alleys, they have it all.”

Homeless encampments are common in the neighborhood, including two just across Eddy Street.

No sooner had the clerk spoken than a man wearing a virus mask walked in, emptied two shelves of snacks into a bag, then headed back for the door.

As he walked past the checkout line, a customer called out, “Sure you don’t want a drink with that?”

Just across busy Van Ness and down a block, a competing CVS pharmacy was fully stocked.

The difference? The CVS had a security guard at the door.

“Up there, they are closer to the Tenderloin. It’s the Wild West,” said a CVS clerk who was standing with the security guard.

The homeless encampments and the thefts at the Walgreens were front and center at a neighborhood town hall at St. Mary’s Cathedral in March.

Police responded by placing two officers and a squad car outside the store at the corner of Eddy and Van Ness.

“Everyone was happy,” Luke said.

But as the pandemic shutdown dragged on, the officers were needed elsewhere. And a short time later, the thieves returned in full force.

Why not?

Under California law, theft of less than $950 in goods is treated as a nonviolent misdemeanor. The maximum sentence for petty theft is six months in county jail. But most of the time the suspect is released with conditions attached.

The Van Ness location is at least the third Walgreens to close in the city in the past year. The Walgreens at 16th and Mission streets closed in December. The Walgreens at 730 Market St. closed in March.

It’s hard to pin down how much the market forces that prompted the closure of 200 Walgreens nationwide was a factor in the local closures and how much theft contributed — or if it was a combination of reasons.

In February, the local news website Hoodline reported that an employee at the Market Street store said the store couldn’t cope with the shoplifting, which was costing the company $1,000 a day.

“Organized retail crime in San Francisco has increased the challenge for all retail, and Walgreens is not immune to that,” company spokesman Caruso said.

Jay Cheng, public policy director for the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, said the rising incidents of shoplifting and worsening street conditions have made it difficult for all neighborhood retail stores to continue to operate in San Francisco.

“We’ve already seen California Attorney General Xavier Becerra uncover a major Bay Area retail theft ring with over $8 million in stolen merchandise,” Cheng said. “These crimes make it dangerous for businesses, employees and customers, and need to be addressed.”

Some stores have hired private security firms or off-duty police officers to deter would-be thieves.

But security is expensive and can cost upward of $1,000 a day.

Add in the losses from theft, and the cost of doing business can become too high for a store to stay open. As for the customers at the Van Ness Walgreens, their prescriptions will be handled by the Walgreens at 1301 Franklin St.

At least for as long as it stays open.
 
We warned them, they didnt' care, so they get what they deserve.

The thing is, the really amazing thing is, they won't learn.

In two years when leftists online start whining about there being no jobs, no food, no stores in the "impoverished areas" I'm just going to remember these videos and laugh.

I proactively claim they'll come up with the concept of "Retail Deserts" and blame it on whitey and his no-good racisms.
 
But how can this be?

I was told by the learned xirs of antifa that KKKORPORASHUNS were bottomless pits of money and items that they selfishly withhold from 'The People.'

I was also told that insurance always pays for everything, because if there is one thing insurance companies love to do, especially with multi-million dollar policies, is pay them out quickly and without question.
 
But how can this be?

I was told by the learned xirs of antifa that KKKORPORASHUNS were bottomless pits of money and items that they selfishly withhold from 'The People.'

I was also told that insurance always pays for everything, because if there is one thing insurance companies love to do, especially with multi-million dollar policies, is pay them out quickly and without question.

They sit in their corporation buildings, and do corporationy things, you see?
 
For anyone who isn't a CA resident or in the know; I believe it was at the state legislature level that any theft that's under ~$900 dollars is treated as a misdemeanor. So even if the staff were to call the cops and the cops actually show up, the most they could do is issue a fine and let them go; and since most cops know it's bullshit, they don't even bother showing up because it's not worth the effort when there's other stuff going on.
There is a proposition to basically repeal that and make retail theft a felony again. You bet your ass I'm voting yes. Shoplifting is basically legal here. You're also not allowed to stop them because they could sue.

California is clown world incarnate.
 
It wouldn't even be that hard with the way digitalization has been going; or God forbid, Amazon gets even bigger and becomes the lead grocery chain with their cashless system. You can also do shit like online express that some stores do, where an order comes in online and paid for; then some gopher gets everything and you pull up and they bring it out to you.

It's still possible to shoplift from Amazon Go. My finding this out by accident is how I got assaulted by a vagrant last year.
 
The funny thing is that this is really a low risk move from thieves, even if they are caught, they will only get a slap to the wrist at most or just be demanded to return what they stole.
Meanwhile the owner is left humiliated and violated.
It also doesnt help most robbers are drug users/extremely poor people that cant be properly punished since they have almost nothing for the state to take and no liberal judge nowadays will punish them since it was "just a shoplifting".

Criminals rarely fear punishment anymore because they can just liberal their way out of it.
 
Last edited:

'Out of control': Organized crime drives S.F. shoplifting, closing 17 Walgreens in five years​

https://www.sfchronicle.com/local-p...ntrol-Organized-crime-drives-S-F-16175755.php (https://archive.ph/mzdnL)
May 15, 2021 4:16 p.m.

For years, John Susoeff walked from his home two blocks to the Walgreens at Bush and Larkin streets — to pick up prescriptions for himself and for less mobile neighbors, to get a new phone card, and to snag senior discounts the first Tuesday of the month.

That changed in March when the Walgreens, ravaged by shoplifting, closed. Susoeff, 77, who sometimes uses a cane, now goes six blocks for medication and other necessities.

“It’s terrible,” he said. On his last visit before the store closed, even beef jerky was behind lock and key. A CVS nearby shuttered in 2019, with similar reports of rampant shoplifting.

“I don’t blame them for closing,” Susoeff said.

Last year, burglaries increased in most San Francisco neighborhoods. Shoplifting decreased under pandemic lockdown and dropped slightly the year before, but incidents are often underreported and have become more violent and brazen, police said.

Retailers attributed a majority of losses to professional thieves instead of opportunistic shoplifters who may be driven by poverty, with one CVS leader calling San Francisco a hub of organized retail crime. Losses have shuttered drugstores providing vital services, even more critical during the pandemic as some stores give out vaccines.

“This has been out of control,” said Supervisor Ahsha Safaí, who held a hearing Thursday with retailers, police, the district attorney and probation departments. “People are scared to go into these stores — seniors, people with disabilities, children. It’s just happening brazenly. We can’t just as a city throw up our hands and say this is OK. We have to come up with solutions.”

The cost of business and shoplifting led Walgreens to shut 17 locations in San Francisco in the past five years — an “unpopular and difficult decision,” Jason Cunningham, regional vice president for pharmacy and retail operations in California and Hawaii, said at the hearing. The company still has 53 stores in the city.

Theft in Walgreens’ San Francisco stores is four times the average for stores elsewhere in the country, and the chain spends 35 times more on security guards in the city than elsewhere, Cunningham said.

At CVS, 42% of losses in the Bay Area came from 12 stores in San Francisco, which are only 8% of the market share, Brendan Dugan, director of organized retail crime and corporate investigations, said at the hearing.

CVS and Walgreens said they train employees to be engaged and visible to prevent theft, but to not confront thieves directly when it could turn violent. CVS security guards in San Francisco have been assaulted, especially at the now-closed Seventh and Market streets location, Dugan said. Some businesses instead hire costly off-duty police officers.

Although the majority of CVS shoplifting incidents in the city are by opportunists, Dugan said, professional crime accounts for 85% of the company’s dollar losses. He said San Francisco is one of the “epicenters” of organized retail crime, pointing to an $8 million state bust in the Bay Area last year.

Officials agreed that different responses were needed depending on why someone was committing a crime. San Francisco Deputy Public Defender Doug Welch called in to the hearing to say his clients charged with shoplifting are not part of organized crime, but are homeless or struggling with substance abuse and need more services.

The San Francisco police burglary unit focuses on investigating serial shoplifters, especially if they’re violent, police said. Beat officers patrol known shoplifting areas. Last year, around 31% of shoplifting incidents resulted in arrest, a percentage that declined over the past couple years, police said.

A statement from Safeway read at Thursday’s hearing blamed Proposition 47, which lowered penalties for thefts under $950, for “dramatic increases” in shoplifting losses. Safaí said he is proud of Prop. 47 and supports criminal justice reform and rehabilitation, but also urges prosecution for organized crime and community ambassadors to prevent opportunistic shoplifting.

Professional shoplifters can work the system by stealing items under the threshold from one store and hitting several retailers in the same day. To prosecute, the district attorney has pursued aggregated charges for multiple petty theft incidents by the same person, such as a recent case of stolen scooters. Police said a person could also be charged with possession of stolen property worth more than $950.

As officials try to stave off crime, San Franciscans suffer from shuttered stores. Residents tried to save the Walgreens at Bush and Larkin in March, circulating a petition and arguing that the next closest store was not handicapped-accessible.

“This has become a lifeline for many seniors, people with disabilities, and low income residents who cannot go further out to other stores to get what they need,” the petition said.

The store still wound up closing.
 
“This has been out of control,” said Supervisor Ahsha Safaí, who held a hearing Thursday with retailers, police, the district attorney and probation departments. “People are scared to go into these stores — seniors, people with disabilities, children. It’s just happening brazenly. We can’t just as a city throw up our hands and say this is OK. We have to come up with solutions.”
I have a solution, and it comes direct from your homeland.
 
San Francisco Deputy Public Defender Doug Welch called in to the hearing to say his clients charged with shoplifting are not part of organized crime, but are homeless or struggling with substance abuse and need more services.

He is right, we just disagree on what kind of services. My proposal has a 💯% success rate.
Tibet executions china.jpg
 
A statement from Safeway read at Thursday’s hearing blamed Proposition 47, which lowered penalties for thefts under $950, for “dramatic increases” in shoplifting losses. Safaí said he is proud of Prop. 47 and supports criminal justice reform and rehabilitation, but also urges prosecution for organized crime and community ambassadors to prevent opportunistic shoplifting.
You can't have it both ways, nigga. You can't be like "Woah, mobs are bad, and organized theft is terrible!" but at the same time let the daily race protests off with minor slaps thinking it combats racism.

Either clap em' or let them all go. But you can't pick and choose which mob causing countless damage is more morally justified. But shit, I dunno, just let the city tank eventually and when all the shitty food lions and Safeway's close up shop, you all can blame food deserts on racism or whatever before moving away from the failure you had produced.
 
Why is that soldier pointing a gun at a child?

It's a still from a video snuck out of North Korea. That woman (not child; remember, they're all of diminished physicality over there, even the military) was caught dealing in the "black market". She probably had a portable video player for sale, or was selling rice fertilized with her own shit, and scraps of "beef" scraped from a discarded cow-hide.
 
Back