Containment Random Chris Updates

No, he hasn't monetised his YouTube channel. When he did some live streams and reactions scattered on YouTube here and there, some trolls and/or "fans" would superchat him some money, sometimes the total would be over $100, but that was the most of it.

He never really had much of an incentive to capitalise off his infamous following (If he did it was because other people would do the hard yards for him, big missed opportunity for more spending money I guess when you look at the amount of views and subs he accumulates on extremely low effort and lazy videos) with his tugboat and no financhu crisis happening for years, it wasn't even an afterthought for him.
And the channel would get DEMONITIZED
 
Why is Chris' arraignment taking so long? I thought additional charges would have been posted already.
May be wrong but it seems like he is in custody more to protect him from all the retards that were hanging around his hotel room.

Edit: It was even mentioned in his court hearing
 
Last edited:
I would only expect such genius reasoning from anal birth
Do you have any evidence to suggest otherwise?

'Greene County Commonwealth’s Attorney Edwin Consolvo asked Judge Barredo to continue to hold Chandler without bond at the Central Virginia Regional Jail in Orange County because he’s “concerned about the community’s safety and Ms. Chandler’s safety.”'

'Consolvo said it’s clear that people sought out where Chandler was staying at a hotel in Henrico and videotaped her arrest. Chandler interrupted the proceedings saying “I’m famous on the internet” loudly, and then Heilberg told her not to speak until spoken to by the court.'

'Barredo said due to the nature of the offense alleged and the fact that there appears to be a personal danger to the defendant and to the public at large he remanded her held without bond until the preliminary trial, scheduled for Sept. 16 at 10 a.m.'

Obviously he's being held over fucking Barb but it seems like they sped up the arrest due to him being at risk. There is no mention of a rape kit or the stolen money from the hearing so we have no reason to suspect otherwise.
 
“concerned about the community’s safety and Ms. Chandler’s safety.”'
Where does it say they're specifically just protecting Chris, genius? He did violate the EPO. They're trying to protect the community from a man who raped his mother too. He was probably to shack up with aunt Harriet for this specific purpose.
 
“concerned about the community’s safety and Ms. Chandler’s safety.”'
Where does it say they're specifically just protecting Chris, genius? He did violate the EPO.
Look at Barredo's quote. The third thing I quoted from the article.
 
Also to the community. They don't want another old lady bukkake one their hands.

Why do you keep ignoring this:

'Barredo said due to the nature of the offense alleged and the fact that there appears to be a personal danger to the defendant and to the public at large he remanded her held without bond until the preliminary trial, scheduled for Sept. 16 at 10 a.m.'
 
"a personal danger to the defendant"

“concerned about the community’s safety and Ms. Chandler’s safety.”'
“concerned about the community’s safety and Ms. Chandler’s safety.”'

Thanks for Cherrypicking..only focusing on the fact that they want to keep Chris from incriminating himself instead of acknowledging that they also think he's a public threat to old women.
 
It's not like it would be without precedent, suspects are arrested and placed in jail as a protective measure from vigilantes or media shitstorms while they await trial fairly often. Trying to tease out added context from any intentionally vague news article is a fool's errand.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Mariposa Electrique
It's not like it would be without precedent, suspects are arrested and placed in jail as a protective measure from vigilantes or media shitstorms while they await trial fairly often. Trying to tease out added context from any intentionally vague news article is a fool's errand.
I'm not trying to tease it out, it's literally stated. My grandmother is still alive and very old, like in her hundreds. I wouldn't want him in my grandmother's neighborhood.
 
This argument is semantics, both are true. I’m sure Chris’s defense doesn’t want Chris out and getting manipulated into anything else, and I’m sure the prosecutor sees a guy with a history of violence and reoffending that’s in trouble for a bonafide sex crime.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Mariposa Electrique
Back