Containment Random Thoughts & Questions

ChrisWikipedia said:
I was just wondering why Chris doesn't have his own Wikipedia page yet. I know its been blacklisted and removed many times, but I feel he deserves one.

Love him or hate him, he's the most well documented man on the internet.
Click to expand...
Who needs a page when you have a whole CWCki? But seriously, Chris is a niche thing and should stay that way as much as possible.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Skitterways, Analog Devolved, uBlock Origin and 3 others
Ophelia said:
Who needs a page when you have a whole CWCki? But seriously, Chris is a niche thing and should stay that way as much as possible.
Click to expand...

It's not a notability issue. There are far less notable people than Chris with Wikipedia articles. Stuff like obscure photographers who are known by far fewer people than Chris. There are other lolcows on Wikipedia -- Terry Davis and Ethan Ralph have pages.

I mean, you can't even *say* "Christian Weston Chandler" or "Sonichu" in an article, even when it's totally relevant (like the one about Kiwi Farms or Ethan Ralph). Your change gets instantly reverted.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Ophelia and uBlock Origin
Pointless Sperg said:
It's not a notability issue. There are far less notable people than Chris with Wikipedia articles. Stuff like obscure photographers who are known by far fewer people than Chris. There are other lolcows on Wikipedia -- Terry Davis and Ethan Ralph have pages.

I mean, you can't even *say* "Christian Weston Chandler" or "Sonichu" in an article, even when it's totally relevant (like the one about Kiwi Farms or Ethan Ralph). Your change gets instantly reverted.
Click to expand...

That's pretty strange. I feel like it has to do with elitism and not wanting Chris on "their" site. Weird since it's against free speech and the latter. With how many people use wikipedia I can see why. Exposing Chris to a wider audience to them is something they don't want for a myriad of reasons.
 
I swear she's 18 said:
That's pretty strange. I feel like it has to do with elitism and not wanting Chris on "their" site. Weird since it's against free speech and the latter. With how many people use wikipedia I can see why. Exposing Chris to a wider audience to them is something they don't want for a myriad of reasons.
Click to expand...
Meanwhile they have whole articles on bullshit like "sea-lioning" which was a meme for like 3 minutes in 2016 or whatever.
 
I swear she's 18 said:
That's pretty strange. I feel like it has to do with elitism and not wanting Chris on "their" site. Weird since it's against free speech and the latter. With how many people use wikipedia I can see why. Exposing Chris to a wider audience to them is something they don't want for a myriad of reasons.
Click to expand...

But there are also far more degenerate people than Chris with Wikipedia articles. There's articles about murderers, rapists, cannibals, etc. There's an article about Mr. Hands.

The only thing different about Chris is how much documentation there is about him, and that he got banned for editing an article about himself back in the day. But plenty of people have also been banned for editing articles about themselves without the articles about them being banned.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Ophelia
Pointless Sperg said:
It's not a notability issue. There are far less notable people than Chris with Wikipedia articles. Stuff like obscure photographers who are known by far fewer people than Chris. There are other lolcows on Wikipedia -- Terry Davis and Ethan Ralph have pages.

I mean, you can't even *say* "Christian Weston Chandler" or "Sonichu" in an article, even when it's totally relevant (like the one about Kiwi Farms or Ethan Ralph). Your change gets instantly reverted.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but but Chris is in a very precarious state as a person.

He's mentally retarded
He's a fat, hideous AGP
Most People Hate Him

Groups don't want to be connected to him.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Tennis-Ball-Tony and Hogar Grupal
Glassshardballpit said:
Will we ever see or hear from Chris again?

Thoughts?
Click to expand...
Probably.

And how all depends on Barb's life span and the outcome of the trial. If she dies before Chris is released or they put some kind of forced restraining order on him he won't have a place to stay (or at least not for long) so we might have to wait a while before we hear from him again, unless people will go and look for him and record him.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Hogar Grupal
Éamon de Valera said:
On the one hand, I think he should never see the light of day for what he did. On the other hand, I kinda wanna have him let loose and see what happens.
Click to expand...
Yeah the saga would continue no doubt, but still. He abused his mother in such a way that he shouldn't be allowed that freedom imo.

Pickle Inspector said:
The inevitable rant will be glorious when he finally gets out, I just hope it’s a recorded video and not a boring long winded Tweet.
Click to expand...
Probably going to be both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mayor Adam West
Éamon de Valera said:
Freedom? I would hardly call him free. Even before the arrest. He was a slave to his own delusions.
Click to expand...
Yeah you're right about that, though I'm speaking more on the simple fact of allowing him to do these things. He'll never be sane that's 100% guaranteed, may just get worse. Idk, kinda makes him a menace to society a bit. I think all the internet did for him was egg it on until he finally crossed the moral line too far. Before it was funny to laugh at him and poke with jokes, now it's just disgusting to think of him at all.
 
Shay said:
Yeah the saga would continue no doubt, but still. He abused his mother in such a way that he shouldn't be allowed that freedom imo.
Click to expand...
Currently, he isn't being charged for anything that will get more than a year of jail.

Of course the charges might be upgraded, but for now, they aren't charging him with felony incest or rape.

The reason is still speculative, we know Barb underwent an evaluation and was judged competent enough to return home and live on her own, so perhaps the prosecutors might believe that Barb was a willing participant so they are unwilling to upgrade the charges. Or they might be hoping for some sort of deal where Chris is declared insane and they can send him to the psyche ward for much longer than his jail sentence would have been.

I know many people, even on this board like to say that Chris raped barb, while the truth is that although it is highly likely, we don't know for sure, and on the legal side of things, Chris is yet to be charged with rape.

I swear she's 18 said:
That's pretty strange. I feel like it has to do with elitism and not wanting Chris on "their" site. Weird since it's against free speech and the latter. With how many people use wikipedia I can see why. Exposing Chris to a wider audience to them is something they don't want for a myriad of reasons.
Click to expand...
We actually know exactly why Chris isn't on wikipedia, it has been discussed within their internal talk pages numerous times, including last year during the merge when Chris hit mainstream.

It has nothing to do with him being a criminal or weirdo, there are lots of sick fucks with wikipedia articles. It's literally just a couple of administrators who hate KF who are vetoing any Chris Chan article or even mention, claiming that he's a nobody that KF shone a spotlight on for no good reason, conveniently neglecting the fact that Chris wants to be famous. In fact, the first article on Chris was created by Chris himself, before he got banned from wikipedia because they assumed it was a troll.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Mesh Gear Fox, uBlock Origin, Ophelia and 1 other person
Bonktrash said:
Currently, he isn't being charged for anything that will get more than a year of jail.

Of course the charges might be upgraded, but for now, they aren't charging him with felony incest or rape.

The reason is still speculative, we know Barb underwent an evaluation and was judged competent enough to return home and live on her own, so perhaps the prosecutors might believe that Barb was a willing participant so they are unwilling to upgrade the charges. Or they might be hoping for some sort of deal where Chris is declared insane and they can send him to the psyche ward for much longer than his jail sentence would have been.

I know many people, even on this board like to say that Chris raped barb, while the truth is that although it is highly likely, we don't know for sure, and on the legal side of things, Chris is yet to be charged with rape.
Click to expand...
That's actually similar to my initial take on it, that they are both equally at fault. Definitely sounds like, especially by what you've said.
 
Hogar Grupal said:
I guess it's true what they say: Chris is his worst troll.
Click to expand...
Ah, I checked with the CWCKI, it wasn't a full article but he typed out an article about himself on his user page, because the submission guidelines were too stringent for a proper article. But it was still deleted by a admin, the rest is accurate
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hogar Grupal
aaradorn said:
Probably.

And how all depends on Barb's life span and the outcome of the trial. If she dies before Chris is released or they put some kind of forced restraining order on him he won't have a place to stay (or at least not for long) so we might have to wait a while before we hear from him again, unless people will go and look for him and record him.
Click to expand...
Even if Chris is homeless I can‘t imagine it’d be long till he bums free Wi-Fi from the nearest McDonald’s since he loves attention too much to stay incognito.
Bonktrash said:
Currently, he isn't being charged for anything that will get more than a year of jail.
Click to expand...
A news article I read said in Virginia he could receive a sentence of up to 10 years for incest but I agree, with his autism he’d probably have gotten the minimum sentence.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Hogar Grupal
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back