Off-Topic Random Trans Thoughts, Musings, and Questions - For all your armchair psych and general sperging

What legal protections and rights do we think Ts, and to a lesser extent QIA+s, will have in 10 or 20 years? Feels like momentum is swinging against them fairly strongly in some key areas. Feel free to elucidate with nation specific insights.
What legal rights do the As need that they don't already have? The right to not have to fuck people? They already have that right. I do feel sorry for the Is, more accurately described as people with Development of Sex Disorders. They haven't done anything wrong and unlike trannies they actually were born this way and didn't just identify into oppresion. And it sucks that trannies use them as human shields to justify their own bullshit. As for the Qs, what the fuck even are they? "Queer" is so broadly defined that it's basically a meaningless label imo.
 
Why do MTF troons and straight femboys always choose to date fat and ugly chicks even when they have better options (judging by my irl and online experience)?

It's because they want to be the feminine and pretty one in a relationship or just some sort of a twisted fetish that comes with AGP?
probably something to do with wanting a nurturing presence if I had to guess if I wanted to get gay and psychoanalytical about it.
fat =motherly characteristics if that makes sense
 
As for the Qs, what the fuck even are they? "Queer" is so broadly defined that it's basically a meaningless label imo.
"Queers" are everyone (who have the correct politics) that don't fall neatly into the natal, heterosexual male/female paradigm.

N.B.: Having the correct politics is a non-negotiable prerequisite to claiming the label of "queer."
 
"Queers" are everyone (who have the correct politics) that don't fall neatly into the natal, heterosexual male/female paradigm.

N.B.: Having the correct politics is a non-negotiable prerequisite to claiming the label of "queer."
okay but we already have words for people who aren't heterosexual, and everyone is a natal male or female, even people with DSDs
 
okay but we already have words for people who aren't heterosexual, and everyone is a natal male or female, even people with DSDs
I'm not saying that's the actual or even proper definition of "queer." I was trying to say, and I can see that I was less than clear, that that is their definition of queer. Basically, anyone, with the correct politics, can claim queer as long as the person looks like he wants to smash the "Father Knows Best," "Ozzie and Harriet" world they delusionally imagine that people with the incorrect politics inhabit.

"Queer," like so many of the alphabet-people words, is a political term.
 
I'm not saying that's the actual or even proper definition of "queer." I was trying to say, and I can see that I was less than clear, that that is their definition of queer. Basically, anyone, with the correct politics, can claim queer as long as the person looks like he wants to smash the "Father Knows Best," "Ozzie and Harriet" world they delusionally imagine that people with the incorrect politics inhabit.

"Queer," like so many of the alphabet-people words, is a political term.
I'm sorry, this is just me compulsively trying to apply logic to a fundamentally illogical set of beliefs.
 
Why do MTF troons and straight femboys always choose to date fat and ugly chicks even when they have better options (judging by my irl and online experience)?

It's because they want to be the feminine and pretty one in a relationship or just some sort of a twisted fetish that comes with AGP?
For an AGP the lust object isn't the woman, it's his narcissistic fantasy of himself as a woman. Lots of Trans Widows say that after their husbands transitioned they became completely self-focused sexually to the point that they basically ignored their wives in bed. So for an AGP it doesn't matter if a woman is attractive; what matters is that she's willing to validate his fantasy. A woman who is insecure about her body might even prefer having her boyfriend's attention fully focused on himself and not on her body.
 
What legal rights do the As need that they don't already have? The right to not have to fuck people? They already have that right. I do feel sorry for the Is, more accurately described as people with Development of Sex Disorders. They haven't done anything wrong and unlike trannies they actually were born this way and didn't just identify into oppresion. And it sucks that trannies use them as human shields to justify their own bullshit. As for the Qs, what the fuck even are they? "Queer" is so broadly defined that it's basically a meaningless label imo.
From what i've seen asexuals/aromantic people claim that everyone thinks they're either trauma victims or just haven't met the right person which is somehow discrimination towards them.Appearently, they also claim they were oppressed back then because people who were probably asexual/aromantic were forced to marry people.The weird thing about asexual/aromantic is claiming to be born that way, and that like a gay gene, there's also a asexual gene.
 
"Queers" are everyone (who have the correct politics) that don't fall neatly into the natal, heterosexual male/female paradigm.

N.B.: Having the correct politics is a non-negotiable prerequisite to claiming the label of "queer."
To me the term "queer" basically just functionally means you're either a troon or someone who fucks troons. That's it. If you're not doing one or both of those things, you're normie and uncool to them. Gays aren't gay enough, lesbians aren't lesbian enough, etc.
 
Powerlevel incoming:

Met up with a friend who works as a teacher in an all girls high school. They said that all the "trans" children basically just act like girls and that they think 95% of trans teens probably aren't "really" trans. Also said that there would probably fewer trans kids if the school was coed because they would better be able to understand how unlike boys they actually are. Apparently every class has at least 1 genderspecial, though there are more enbys than trannies. It was frustrating because I got them so close to the point but they still refused to grasp it. I pointed out how normal gender nonconformity was in the 2000s and I was assured that a lot of those people weren't "really" male or female but they just lacked the language to express that. As if being male of female is defined by how closely you follow gender stereotypes.

They clearly see the symptoms of gender madness but have bought into enough of the ideology that they refuse to understand the root cause, pathologization of gender nonconformity and normalization of narcissism. This is a smart person who should know better, but we live in a big liberal city and they've drunk too much of the Kool-Aid to admit they fucked up. Even when evidence of that fuck up is staring them in the face.

Kept details vague to avoid doxxing myself, but honestly this story could have come from any liberal city in America.
 
From what i've seen asexuals/aromantic people claim that everyone thinks they're either trauma victims or just haven't met the right person which is somehow discrimination towards them.Appearently, they also claim they were oppressed back then because people who were probably asexual/aromantic were forced to marry people.The weird thing about asexual/aromantic is claiming to be born that way, and that like a gay gene, there's also a asexual gene.
Aces tend to fall into a couple of types ( These observations are based entirely on women. I'm not gonna try and speak for men's motivation on this one)

1) Sexually inexperienced/virgin women who are psychologically terrified of sex, likely due to misinformation heard when growing up, from the media, or porn.

2) Genuine rape/sexual trauma victims

3) Pick me's ( These are the type who will claim you can be asexual and still enjoy sex. And that it's possible to have non sexual kinks. It's a 100% and attention thing. And within 5 years, they're gonna be married to a man)

4) Undiagnosed medical condition often related to the thyroid or side effect of a medication that went unnotice and its causing severe lowering of libido. You sometimes see this in young people who say they've never had a sex drive. But they've also been on SSRIs since they were 14.

5) Straight "queers" Who enter into same-sex relationships then don't wanna be physically intimate cause they're straight, so they're just "ace."
 
I can actually believe in an asexual gene: no sex drive or no desire to fuck makes sense. It can be an error on the body and genes but it's not the most outlandish thing. LimeRikki does a good outline, and number 4 is where I'd put the possibility of ace.


There's also type:
6) My fetish and sex drive is so weird it only works detectively or with specific fetishes due to either neurological causes like autism or extreme porn consumption that drained my balls

And type 6.5) I'm saying I'm asexual because I want to distract you from my real fetish, something awful like adult diapers which are the only thing that can get me off.
 
Man, I want people to figure out a better way to say "pronouns" and mean "pronouns."

Everyone has pronouns; they're a part of speech, you dorks! There needs to be a succinct phrase for troon or theyfab-demanded incorrect pronouns, which are the red flag people are describing when they say "pronouns."

Suggestions:
  • Custom pronouns
  • Prescriptive pronouns (derogatory; people love to sperg about descriptive vs. prescriptive language)
  • Non-intuitive pronouns (I like this because it sounds kind at first)
  • Vanity pronouns (also derogatory but probably too obvious)
 
Man, I want people to figure out a better way to say "pronouns" and mean "pronouns."

Everyone has pronouns; they're a part of speech, you dorks! There needs to be a succinct phrase for troon or theyfab-demanded incorrect pronouns, which are the red flag people are describing when they say "pronouns."

Suggestions:
  • Custom pronouns
  • Prescriptive pronouns (derogatory; people love to sperg about descriptive vs. prescriptive language)
  • Non-intuitive pronouns (I like this because it sounds kind at first)
  • Vanity pronouns (also derogatory but probably too obvious)
Decent point but outside of employer-imposed pronoun declarations even those who declare congruent pronouns tend to be revealing themselves as cowards at best or koolaid swillers as bad as any tranny at worst.

Also I find the expectation that I supply my pronouns (for instance on a medical intake form) equally offensive.
 
Decent point but outside of employer-imposed pronoun declarations even those who declare congruent pronouns tend to be revealing themselves as cowards at best or koolaid swillers as bad as any tranny at worst.
Yeah, you also make a good point. I'm just bothered when people say "I don't have pronouns/have any friends with pronouns," because we know what they mean, but they're technically wrong and it sounds dumb. Explicitly-specified pronouns in a bio or sigfile, no matter what they are, are the red flag.

Might be a bit of the 'tism.
Also I find the expectation that I supply my pronouns (for instance on a medical intake form) equally offensive.
It does let one know the extent to which one is going to have to stay guarded during the upcoming encounter, if one wants one's meds renewed or labs and imaging ordered. The emperor has no clothes, but shamefully, I'm too much of a coward to risk losing an entire medical network over it.
 
Man, I want people to figure out a better way to say "pronouns" and mean "pronouns."

Everyone has pronouns; they're a part of speech, you dorks! There needs to be a succinct phrase for troon or theyfab-demanded incorrect pronouns, which are the red flag people are describing when they say "pronouns."

Suggestions:
  • Custom pronouns
  • Prescriptive pronouns (derogatory; people love to sperg about descriptive vs. prescriptive language)
  • Non-intuitive pronouns (I like this because it sounds kind at first)
  • Vanity pronouns (also derogatory but probably too obvious)
How about "troonified bullshit"?
It's what I use when people start talking about pronouns.
Also I find the expectation that I supply my pronouns (for instance on a medical intake form) equally offensive.
I've never run across this but if I did I'd be pretty disgusted tbh, I'd leave it blank, and if asked I'd ask why that bullshit was on the form.
Fortunately don't see a lot of that shit around here as of yet, and the way things are looking hopefully the tides starting to roll back on the worst of the foolishness.
I'd hate to live in some Blue shithole where you can't move for their bullshit.
 
Power leveling: I once laugh at a troon face because he told me I should respect his pronouns. I laughed so hard other people started to chuckle too and the troon wanted to cry and hit me.

All troons are violent retard degenerates.
 
Back