- Joined
- Jan 4, 2020
Strangely I'm guessing that trans humanist trans people actually support a lot of this: usually they have body dysmorphia themselves but more geared towards wanting to become robots, furries, extra arms, extreme body mods, etc.. I think anorexia only escapes because a lot of 90s and 2000s entertainment for kids (remember, autism) tackles how eating disorders and weightloss are bad. That, and they have a 50% chance of being FAT themselves. If you questioned trans people on their beliefs for body mods in general, you'd get a lot more for it.but what about the similar issue of body dysmorphia? the condition in which people will go as far as to starve themselves or even remove limbs because they see something everyone else around them does not.
This really amuses me. I think you're at least partially right but we can't discount how crucial them being in the LGBT movement is. Early 2010s you had them say the same slogans as gays, then time went on and they had to make more and more ridiculous arguments based on their extreme beliefs and shifting of their own overton window of politics within the trans community. The 2010s Social Justice Movement was latched onto by parasites all over, including these retards.i think its because of the money. if there was more profit to be made from telling an anorexic person to starve themselves more because being a weird skeleton monster is the ideal beauty standard then that would be the norm and anyone who argued otherwise would be seen as an awful body shaming monster.
It's a surprise considering how many are furries too.when asked, they can't explain why being an animal is supposed to be so bad? they can't refute, so simply scream it is a horrible thing to say in the first place.
they treat it as a mean accusation instead of a fact.
the religious/spritual basis of troondom becomes pretty obvious.
For post over a certain character limit, jiat highlight a sentence or two you want to quote and up should pop up a mini "quote|reply" button. Null got tired of super long post so this helps.
The other problem is how do we account for countries populated by black, brown, and asian people on what is a woman? Try and pull that on a bunch of Peruvian farmers and they'd laugh at you. They're brown, thus your argument is invalid, white "girl".I've seen so many TIMs who now completely ignore the question and say "It doesn't matter what the definition of a woman is because every woman's experience(even cis women)with womanhood is different from everyone elses." The problem with their logic is that if there really is no clear way to be a woman and defining it then how exactly can TIMS know they feel like women when being a woman has no clear meaning to it?