Random Tumblr posts

[TheMightyMonarch]

Since when is The L Word considered an accurate representation? Last I checked, that show was obvious fanservice for straight boys

My friend, who was a lesbian, seemed to like that show in high school. Idk how she would feel about it now since she unfortunately has gone SJW since.

But I wouldn't be surprised if whoever wrote that post based their media interests on the fact that they're gay, which is never a good sign.

They're onto our "DeviantArt Horrors" and "SJW Art" threads, folks...

View attachment 63021

Uh, don't we already make fun of those artist?

 

[Positron]

Weird how they accidentally just described Dobson.

Paid comic artist.

 

[Yamyam]

They're onto our "DeviantArt Horrors" and "SJW Art" threads, folks...

View attachment 63021

Funny thing is that half of these people on tumblr don't know how anatomy works, their art look the same, and love to get off of drawings as well with all their fetish art

But it's okay when they do it because something something being oppressed

 

[Alberto Balsalm]

12-year-olds on the internet are funny. Not everything has to be a profound attack against the cishetpatriarchy.

 

[ActualKiwi]

12-year-olds on the internet are funny. Not everything has to be a profound attack against the cishetpatriarchy.

Unfortunately, the 12 year olds (whether this be biological or indeed mental age) of the internet seem blind to that, and just go with whatever snowflake fad is currently in vogue..
"Yo ucan't say that! That's triggering and a blatant example of cistranssomethingorather that I find sooooo incredilby offensive!!11!!!1"

 

[Lunete]

It's that time of year again:

 

[Yamyam]

With a url like that I wonder why people made it political.
Also turd turrets

 

[ActualKiwi]

With a url like that I wonder why people made it political.
Also turd turrets

Yeah I definitely get the feeling she kind of asked for it to go political with a handle like that.. though she seems marvelously oblivious to that fact.

 

[Yamyam]

Yeah I definitely get the feeling she kind of asked for it to go political with a handle like that.. though she seems marvelously oblivious to that fact.

From what I've seen of her, she do look to start drama with her bullshit ideology then act like she wasn't the one who started it.

That or she forgets that tumblr is a public blogging platform. Just like she have every right to say whatever edgy bullshit she want to say others have the right to reblog it and call her a idiot.

 

[Problematic Kawaii]

A tumblrite needs money because family is trigguring and oppressive.

Spoiler: long whiny post

View attachment 62934
View attachment 62933
View attachment 62935
I always try to assume the best of people, but I've lost count of the number of times I've seen tumblr users pull this shit, complete with reblogging the original post multiple times to beg for even more donations. Especially "buying an animal desperately needed for health reasons." Aren't those usually reserved for people who have been through extreme trauma?

Yeah.
I'm a bit wary of "I need to move out/money" posts because people do scam and exploit people.

They're onto our "DeviantArt Horrors" and "SJW Art" threads, folks...

View attachment 63021

None of these people would survive a serious art critique.

 

[TheMightyMonarch]

With a url like that I wonder why people made it political.
Also turd turrets

Good god. This is some cringey shit right here.

 

[Frank_Jaeger]

It's that time of year again:

CHINESE NEW YEAR HAPPENS IN SPRING YOU PIECE OF SHIT, WAY TO NOT BE INCLUSIVE

 

[Fiddleford]

 

[Meowthkip]

Uh, don't we already make fun of those artist?

No one is safe.

All shitty art will be demolished.

We hunger.

 

[Vitriol]

so back in August I was shamelessly weening in the now defunct SU thread (; https://kiwifarms.net/threads/steven-universe-fandom-gemtlemen.11597/page-40#post-940976) badly recolouring OC's and attaching crude captions and comments, naturally Tumblr took the bait and a few of us enjoyed the resulting overreactions from tumblr users.

I haven't posted since late september/ early October but checked the account last week and found out people are still freaking out over my posts.naturally I posted a few more inflammatory comments and will shortly do another raft of 'fixed' OCs. keep in mind the following posts are about blatant troll posts about a children's cartoon on a blog that had been inactive for months:

Spoiler: cartoons are serious bzns

I, as an artist, have learned from the dobson thread and will listen to my critics; the next batch of edits will include quotes from the Koran and hadith for 'diversity'.

Spoiler: diversity is a positive thing ;)

For ye practice your lusts on men in preference to women: ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds.... And we rained down on them a shower (of brimstone)"

Abu Dawud (444 - "If a man who is not married is seized committing sodomy, he will be stoned to death."

Qur'an (4:89) - "They wish that you should disbelieve as they disbelieve, and then you would be equal; therefore take not to yourselves friends of them, until they emigrate in the way of God; then, if they turn their backs, take them, and slay them wherever you find them; take not to yourselves any one of them as friend or helper."

 

[Piga Dgrifm]

I love how, no matter how obvious you make it, they can't see you're a troll.

 

[Vitriol]

I love how, no matter how obvious you make it, they can't see you're a troll.

it got better:

Spoiler

I might be up to mischief

 

[SteelPlatedHeart]

 

[kidsquid]

1: Casual cissexism isn't a thing hon
2: The vast majority of non binary people are transtrenders
3: Intersex is a rare condition
4: If you look like and dress like a woman, people are going to assume that you're a woman.

 

[autisticdragonkin]

ACE-PERVERT:

SJ-IS-NOT-SJW:

POUNDING-POUNDCAKE:

ELIMINATIVISM:

IAMRYANHENLY:

ELIMINATIVISM:

IAMRYANHENLY:

MRAs: Want to take out one Jenga block (men’s rights)

Feminists: Want to make the whole thing collapse upon itself (patriarchy)

MRAs aren’t helping men, maybe in the short term but for longevity I believe men need to support feminists if we want true equality. I know what group I stand with.

MRAs are taking issue with specific things in society which affect men. The validity of each issue can be measured, depending on what it is. Some causes have more validity to it, some less.

Feminists are inventing a whole system of nonsense and cry about it. It cannot be measured because they are irriational concepts outside the normal sphere of intellect - there is no solidity, their ideology is malleable like play-doh, if you argue against one part, they either give ground (”that’s not part of feminism”) and as you as you turn your back, they sprout the same lies as before, or they simply say that “watever reality looks like, I don’t want to change my mind”.

And with that being their basis, they are blocking advanement of society, even damage it. Feminism causes damage and suffering to actual living persons, but you will apologise it because you have a closed mind. Very concerning.

In a way, yes, feminist want make the “whole thing” collapse - if by “the whole thing” you mean reason, rationality, justice and fairness.

Considering you are a turd on legs, it’s indeed no wonder on which side you are on. You are up to your neck in the shit which comes out of your mouth, and because everything is covered by your shit, you don’t realise how much different the world actually looks underneath the layer of shit you intentionally surroung yourself with - as I said in the other post: this is either an intentional decision of yours, or you are indeed too stupid to grasp how wrong you actually are.

You want to take everything out of historical context to fit your pseudo-logical viewpoint on the world. It’s not about fixing the problems we see right in front of us in our generations but the problems that still remain from generations past.

Our differences are purely ideological. I feel you’re simplifying society is not helping to solve anything. You simply cannot put a plaster over an infection, we must clean the wound from the inside out. Calling me ‘stupid’ is uncalled for. We are not stupid for disagreeing, simply human.

Why are men forced to go to war. Why are men’s emotions pushed aside. Why are men’s problems not seen as valid? I believe its down to social conditioning through the centuries that persists today.

The fact remains that most positions of power are held by men but we see little movement for men’s rights. Men have the power at this very moment to overthrow feminism if they believed it’s a harmful concept.

Obama has the power to eradicate SS, to illegalized male circumcision. So much could be done for men right this second and I refuse to believe these things are still in place for any other reason than gender roles that need to be descontrusted.

MRAs are fighting directly against these roles whilst failing to acknowledge them, no wonder they are getting nowhere.

• You want to take everything out of historical context to fit your pseudo-logical viewpoint on the world.

No, in contrast to the cherry-picking of feminism, I do take everything in its historic context, because I actually care about historical accuracy.

And don’t talk to my about logic. Every post you make is a demonstration of you being unable to think logically, even after I or other people slowly and carefully held your hand along the way from a cause A to a result B multiple times and you still do not get it.

I am willing to demonstrate why I have my worldview, where it comes from and how causal chains lead to certain observable results - or why they do not.

You have nothing like that. Feminism has nothing like that. You and feminism, from which you take a lot of your beliefs, have claims about the world which are not supported by evidence or even go directly against evidence. That’s why you can never demonstrate anything when challenged, you can simply say “No, I think different”. You have no reasons, you have no arguments. You only have commitment.

This is also called blind faith.

• Our differences are purely ideological.

Our? You mean between me and you? Oh, we have many differences, but that is not important right here and right now.

• I feel you’re simplifying society is not helping to solve anything.

Which simplifications?

• You simply cannot put a plaster over an infection, we must clean the wound from the inside out.

That implies you are able to identify the wound. You are a mad, blind doctor with two amputated arms. You and people like you should be nowhere near a patient for the sake of the patient.

• Calling me ‘stupid’ is uncalled for. We are not stupid for disagreeing, simply human.

I don’t call you stupid because you disagree with me. People of various intellectual capacity disagree with me or agree with me.

We two disagree and you, specifically you, just happen to be one of the most stupid idiots I have ever seen on the internet.

There are people I disagree with who are many times smarter than you are. For example, there are radical extremist feminists who can string together several sentences in a perfectly coherent manner to explain a complex causal relationship they believe in. They might be wrong about their conclusion - but at least they understand what an argument is and how to formulate one - and what causality is and why it is important to be able to speak about it in a understanding and coherent manner in the first place. Some of them are very witty, in a callous way. Those are signs of intelligence.

You do not show any of these signs, either by conscious decision, in which case it is up to you to show you are not as stupid as you display to be if you feel the descriptor does not fit, or because you are actually unable to be different, in which case my observation of you being stupid stands true.

But not to digress.

• Why are men forced to go to war.

Because sometimes a society decides that armed conflict is necessary for a certain goal - whatever that goal is in the context of that society - or unavoidable, and men are the suitable candidates for armed conflict. Societies don’t send little children, nor do they send old men bent by age - if they can avoid it. They send men, adult men and tall boys, who as healthy as circumstances allow, because they are the ones who will be most successful in conflict. Not children, not pensioners, and not women. Women are slower, women are weaker, women are less psychologically resilient, women give birth, women are neotenous and seen as worthy of more protection from deadly violence than men.

The societies in which different customs existed either changed or they died out.

When a man was caught by robbers on the highway, he didn’t say “Have mercy, for I am a man and you surely know my worth.” He said “Have mercy, I have wife and children. For their sakes, spare me.”

• Why are men’s emotions pushed aside.

This is one of the false simplifications which are perpetrated in the wake of flawed feminist thinking.The premise is flawed, because a superficial glance at current reality and at history shows that men are perfectly comfortable with expressing emotions in the right contexts and in their own way, among the right people, when they feel it is appropriate.

From art to literature to simply cohabitation, it is a trivial observation that men are having emotions and can express them - the question a) the how b) the context and c) the tolerance around it.

That means, for example, not among sociopaths, like feminists, who will only use that sign of weakness - because the expression of a deep emotion is a moment of vulnerability - to hurt a man even further. But more or less, it is because men are supposed to be functional, not well. That does not mean that men and women want men to feel bad, but it is somewhat less important if men do. Men were and are emotional expressive - every idiot can recognise that and a superficial at history shows that men can be emotional - they are just less expressive about it than women and for many functions which men performed, being very emotionally expressive is detrimental to the success of the function.

From fighting over impressing a mate to business transactions, you don’t to show how you actually feel if you don’t want to give your competitor an advantage. If you show how pleased you are about a financial offer, the other will know you expected less. If you show you are frightened in combat, the other group will feel they have the advantage and press more rigourously forward. If you show you are nervous when you approach a woman, she might think you are overselling yourself. At a funeral of a child, a father can cry like the mother - but if the mother is feeling very unwell, the father might decide to delay his own pain somewhat until he could do something to console her, because he does not want to add to the worry of his wife. When he feels it is appropriate - maybe when alone or maybe with his brother or in front of a priest or whatever - he will express his sadness.

These are observable behavioural trends and they are the reason why men are seen as “strong” - and that creates a feedback loop. Being strong in that way is useful, so men strive for it. Because they are associated with it, it is attributed to them. Because it is attributed to them, it becomes, to a degree, expected. But it is also not an unreasonable expections, since it is generally true.

This is also not only applying to men - it is just about as useful to conceal emotions for women as it is for men and, trivial observation, women were in history often expected to keep a good demeanour and they were praised for “showing strength”. And they can do it today.

The standards of expection for women are just lower and men are just, unsurprisingly if we look at the development of our species, simply better at it. Men are less expressive because, although it was a generally useful for both sexes, men were more often in situation in which, if they did not appropriately control their emotions, it could lead to very bad results, which affected their reproductive success. The same is less true for women, so it was more useful to men. Ergo, the descendants of these men are those men who are running around now. Men and women were under different selective pressures, that’s why they are different.

• Why are men’s problems not seen as valid?

Because a) men are supposed to deal with problems, since overcoming problems is one of the distinctive traits of being a man (function over comfort) and b) because groups like feminists lie about men’s problems, deny them and supress men’s and women’s ability to talk about men’s problems publicly.

How many people even know about men’s problems? Relatively few. And how many of those who did hear about it are idiots like you who have swallowed the feminist pill? A good portion.

• I believe its down to social conditioning through the centuries that persists today.

No, idiot.

• The fact remains that most positions of power are held by men

No and irrelevant.

No, because political power is just one overt type of power. How about psychological power? How about the power of manipulating information which is fed to people in power?

Irrelevant, because men in positions of power have women on their mind, not men, just like men outside of positions of power. Women have a psychological ingroup bias, men do not have an ingroup bias. On the contrary, men have a bias in favour of women.

So, women in positions of overt power think “women, women, women, women…” and men in positions of overt power think “women, women, women, women…” when they think about social problems, because that is what they are taught and also it is their nature to sympathise with women and ignore men as a group.

• and I refuse to believe

Yes you do. You are an idiot without arguments for his own position who just decides to refuse to see anything beside his own views. You don’t have to repeat that so often. That message has arrived loud and clear by now.

Every time I see @IAMRYANHENLY it’s when they are getting chewed up and shit out. It’s quite amusing.

That’s because @IAMRYANHENLY is a moron.

And an asshole

Quoted for readability