Random Tumblr posts

sparklemilhouse said:
http://auroralady.tumblr.com/post/137553670893/why-doll-make-unders-make-me-uncomfortable

Because repurposing old discarded dolls is racist.
Click to expand...
Wow, good find. As a dollfag :powerlevel: I'd like to add that the whole reason Bratz makeunders are a thing is because some parents weren't comfortable with their kids playing with something that skanky. There's also the fact that modifying dolls to be heavier/disabled/etc isnt something a lot of people have the skills or supplies to do (which is probably the main reason the makeunder artists havent done it). Not that it's impossibly or that no one's done it, but it's quite different than face repaints.

If the author wants dolls like that, she should try making them herself. That would be pretty funny to watch.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, PeckingOrder, FramerGirl420 and 6 others
ShiningPokeStar said:
View attachment 69234
View attachment 69235
Click to expand...
I like how "Mod Dipper" here is so quick to call trends common to male scene kids feminine. Really defying those traditional gender roles there.

Also, for fuck's sake, these people need to start watching things other than children's cartoons if they're so bent out of shape about crossdressing jokes.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Coral Apples, PeckingOrder and 2 others
kidsquid said:
Tumblr doesn't often spit truths, but I like it when it does.
View attachment 69152
Social justice culture still sucks though.
Click to expand...

These posts are a dime a dozen and a pathetic attempt for people to try and "address" the problems with internet SJ culture. But none of these people ever do anything about it, and the blogs that do call Tumblrinas on their shit are assumed to be all anti-SJW right-wingers and racists.

ShiningPokeStar said:
View attachment 69234
View attachment 69235
Click to expand...

This show has a 12-year-old girl character that's voiced by a grown man but Toby wearing a "sassy girl" shirt is just TOO FUCKING FAR.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Coral Apples, Tokitae and 5 others
I find this utterly repulsive.
"THIS. THIS IS HOW YOU BE A MALE FEMINIST." By sitting around crying on behalf of women who think men have it so much better? By pandering to their insecurities and closely-held (but ultimately false) beliefs? Seriously??? Nobody's attracted to a guy who prostrates himself before a movement that doesn't have its priorities straight anymore.
Half or more of these arguments, btw, are either outdated or just plain incorrect.
Just disgusting.
I think the physical abuse one is the most awful, because statistics clearly show that men are abused as often as women in heterosexual marriages, if not moreso.
Guy number 1: said:
I do not understand this “male privilege" bullshit.

What. Fucking. Privileges. Do. Men. Have.???????

Name them. I swear, I challenge you to name these “male privileges" and be able to prove them.

Come on, I fucking dare you.

Name them!
Click to expand...

Guy#2 said:
Oh boy. Well, as a man, I’ll tell you my male privilege.

  1. My odds of being hired for a job, when competing against female applicants, are probably skewed in my favor. The more prestigious the job, the larger the odds are skewed.
  2. I can be confident in the fact that my co-workers won’t think that I was hired/promoted because of my sex - despite the fact that it’s probably true.
  3. If I ever am promoted when a woman of my peers is better suited for the job, it is because of my sex.
  4. If i ever fail at my job or career, it won’t be seen as a blacklist against my sex’s capabilities.
  5. I am far less likely to face sexual harassment than my female peers.
  6. If I do the same task as a woman, and if the measurement is at all subjective, chances are people will think I did a better job.
  7. If I am a teen or an adult, and I stay out of prison, my odds of getting raped are relatively low.
  8. On average, I’m taught that walking alone after dark by myself is less than dangerous than it is for my female peers.
  9. If I choose not to have children, my masculinity will not be questioned.
  10. If I do have children but I do not provide primary care for them, my masculinity will not be questioned.
  11. If I have children and I do care for them, I’ll be praised even if my care is only marginally competent.
  12. If I have children and a career, no one will think I’m selfish for not staying at home.
  13. If I seek political office, my relationship with my children or who I deem to take care of them will more often not be scrutinized by the press.
  14. My elected representatives are mostly people of my own sex. The more prestigious the position, the more this is true.
  15. When i seek out “the person in charge", it is likely that they will be someone of my own sex. The higher the position, the more often this is true.
  16. As a child, chances are I am encouraged to be more active and outgoing than my sisters.
  17. As a child, I could choose from an almost infinite variety of children’s media featuring positive, active, non-stereotyped heroes of my own sex. I never had to look for it; male protagonists were (and are) the default.
  18. As a child, chances are I got more teacher attention than girls who raised their hands just as often.
  19. If my day, week or year is going badly, I need not ask of each negative episode or situation whether or not it has sexist overtones. (Nobody’s going to ask if I’m upset because I’m menstruating.)
  20. I can turn on the television or glance at the front page of the newspaper and see people of my own sex widely represented.
  21. If I’m careless with my financial affairs it won’t be attributed to my sex.
  22. If I’m careless with my driving it won’t be attributed to my sex.
  23. I can speak in public to a large group without putting my sex on trial.
  24. Even if I sleep with a lot of women, there is little to no chance that I will be seriously labeled a “slut,” nor is there any male counterpart to “slut-bashing.”
  25. I do not have to worry about the message my wardrobe sends about my sexual availability.
  26. My clothing is typically less expensive and better-constructed than women’s clothing for the same social status. While I have fewer options, my clothes will probably fit better than a woman’s without tailoring.
  27. The grooming regimen expected of me is relatively cheap and consumes little time.
  28. If I buy a new car, chances are I’ll be offered a better price than a woman buying the same car. The same goes for other expensive merchandise.
  29. If I’m not conventionally attractive, the disadvantages are relatively small and easy to ignore.
  30. I can be loud with no fear of being called a shrew. I can be aggressive with no fear of being called a bitch.
  31. I can ask for legal protection from violence that happens mostly to men without being seen as a selfish special interest, since that kind of violence is called “crime” and is a general social concern. (Violence that happens mostly to women is usually called “domestic violence” or “acquaintance rape,” and is seen as a special interest issue.)
  32. I can be confident that the ordinary language of day-to-day existence will always include my sex. “All men are created equal,” mailman, chairman, freshman, he.
  33. My ability to make important decisions and my capability in general will never be questioned depending on what time of the month it is.
  34. I will never be expected to change my name upon marriage or questioned if I don’t change my name.
  35. The decision to hire me will not be based on assumptions about whether or not I might choose to have a family sometime soon.
  36. Every major religion in the world is led primarily by people of my own sex. Even God, in most major religions, is pictured as male.
  37. Most major religions argue that I should be the head of my household, while my wife and children should be subservient to me.
  38. If I have a wife or live-in girlfriend, chances are we’ll divide up household chores so that she does most of the labor, and in particular the most repetitive and unrewarding tasks.
  39. If I have children with my girlfriend or wife, I can expect her to do most of the basic childcare such as changing diapers and feeding.
  40. If I have children with my wife or girlfriend, and it turns out that one of us needs to make career sacrifices to raise the kids, chances are we’ll both assume the career sacrificed should be hers.
  41. Assuming I am heterosexual, magazines, billboards, television, movies, pornography, and virtually all of media is filled with images of scantily-clad women intended to appeal to me sexually. Such images of men exist, but are rarer.
  42. In general, I am under much less pressure to be thin than my female counterparts are. If I am over-weight, I probably suffer fewer social and economic consequences for being fat than over-weight women do.
  43. If I am heterosexual, it’s incredibly unlikely that I’ll ever be beaten up by a spouse or lover.
  44. Complete strangers generally do not walk up to me on the street and tell me to “smile.”
  45. Sexual harassment on the street virtually never happens to me. I do not need to plot my movements through public space in order to avoid being sexually harassed, or to mitigate sexual harassment.
  46. On average, I am not interrupted by women as often as women are interrupted by men.
  47. On average, I will have the privilege of not knowing about my male privilege.
And lastly, I am taken as a more credible feminist than my female peers, despite the fact that the feminist movement is not liberating to my sex.

This is male privilege.
Click to expand...

EDIT: fuck it Im just pasting in the text. Couldn't make the image large enough.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: Ho Mo for Women
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Slugbutts, Magpie and 15 others
I remember a time when someone would post a headcanon or fan theory about a show, and cite parts of the source material to back it up, making the headcanon into something that could be kind of fun to think about. They also weren't all just about gender special shit and who wanted to fuck who. Nowadays, it's just: "SHERLOCK HOLMES IS AN AGENDER DEMIGIRL PANSEXUAL HOMOROMANTIC JAR-JAR-BINKS-KIN, AND ANYONE WHO DISAGREES IS A BIGOT!"
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, E-reptile Dysfunction, Flamesoul the Diabolical and 15 others
Piga Dgrifm said:
I remember a time when someone would post a headcanon or fan theory about a show, and cite parts of the source material to back it up, making the headcanon into something that could be kind of fun to think about. They also weren't all just about gender special shit and who wanted to fuck who. Nowadays, it's just: "SHERLOCK HOLMES IS AN AGENDER DEMIGIRL PANSEXUAL HOMOROMANTIC JAR-JAR-BINKS-KIN, AND ANYONE WHO DISAGREES IS A BIGOT!"
Click to expand...
For anyone that thinks this might be a straw man:
http://ask-humantale.tumblr.com

I'm here to remove your faith in humanity.
 
  • Late
Reactions: fishercat, APerson, Anarchaprincess and 1 other person
Johnny Bravo said:
https://web.archive.org/web/2016011.../post/137632841523/internetsomebody-benskylos

"You can't disagree with headcanon."
Click to expand...

Except that Episode III disproves Luke as trans, because Padme gives birth to Luke and Leia: a boy and a girl. And then the boy is brought by Obi-Wan to live on Tatooine with Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru.

So if Luke is biologically male and never once identifies as a female in the trilogy, then yes, trans-han, there is canon source material disproving him as being trans at all, you stupid fucking idiot. And that isn't even going into the EU or anything, that's just the films. So really, the only reason you're insisting on this is to either bait people into disagreeing with you so you can call them transphobic, or to have a reason to jerk off to cuntboy Luke Skywalker because you're a tranny-chaser fetishist. Or both of those.

When your headcanon blatantly contradicts what's explicitly canon just so you can score some easy SJ brownie points on Tumblr, it is time to log off of Tumblr.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: Aunt Carol, UnsufficentBoobage, Johnny Bravo and 17 others
But
Android raptor said:
Wow, good find. As a dollfag :powerlevel: I'd like to add that the whole reason Bratz makeunders are a thing is because some parents weren't comfortable with their kids playing with something that skanky. There's also the fact that modifying dolls to be heavier/disabled/etc isnt something a lot of people have the skills or supplies to do (which is probably the main reason the makeunder artists havent done it). Not that it's impossibly or that no one's done it, but it's quite different than face repaints.

If the author wants dolls like that, she should try making them herself. That would be pretty funny to watch.
Click to expand...

But does it really matter tho?
All kids do is fuck up toys
They're not worried about "why is she dress like this" they're more concern if she can fly or what can I do to this bitch hair? Can I have another toy because it's not nice anymore
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Flamesoul the Diabolical, Pilzgeschwader and ActualKiwi
image.jpeg
image.jpeg


This actually pissed me off.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Autistic
Reactions: Eeveelutions, Vicious.ink3, Flamesoul the Diabolical and 11 others
Fiddleford said:
"Don't have time for this nt bullshit"
People with anxiety disorders and depression are neurotypical now, you heard it here folks.
Click to expand...

The term "neurotypical" doesn't even make sense; after looking into depression and anxiety to see if they even qualified as "neurological disorders" (after suspecting that they're strictly mental disorders), I decided to actually look up what qualifies as a neurological disorder. Guess what: autism doesn't appear to be neurological. It's developmental. Neurological disorders affect the entire nervous system and usually involve difficulty with mobility and memory.

http://www.ucsfhealth.org/conditions/neurological_disorders/

So the terms "neurotypical" and "neurodivergent" are cribbing terminology from people with epilepsy, Parkinson's, brain tumors or Multiple Sclerosis.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: sarcasticslipandslide, Flamesoul the Diabolical, Coral Apples and 13 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back