Random Tumblr posts

1724439777506.png
 
problematicreasoning.jpg

Somehow, I feel that you already hate God and just wan to find excuses.
More to the point, I feel tha this type of reasoning... atheists who actually get off the Internet will really push genetic engineering because they wan to 'fix' the 'flaws' of the human body. They will succeed...
...and will have a bad time.
 
Really Stupid Tumblr Discourse Time!

So a user decided to make this poll asking people whether or not would they be
upset if they seen strangers having sex in a public space
1724743547344.png
Despite "No" being the winning answer, because Tumblr is a website full of coddled zoomers that never go outside or stepped in an area where this is frequently happens, the creator of the poll had a massive spergout chastising thosewho said "Yes" in his poll because he believes that it's homeless people deserve a sex life and it's their "biological privilege", he also dismisses people's concerns of children being exposed to this as puritan pearl-clutching and believes that public sex can teach children consent, while calling anybody that disagrees with him a TERF and right-wing puritan.
1724743651010.png1724743957308.png1724743957308.png1724743783691.png
1724743643792.png

1724744185036.png1724744244852.png1724743735502.png

Remember fellow Kiwis, from now on when a homeless man flashes his junk at a woman or a child, he isn't being a sex pest degenerate
he just letting out his pent-up feelings because homeless people deserve to have a sex life, also OP is a male enby.

1724744696493.png1724744706410.png

>Male "enby"
>Weirdly defensive about people including children being exposed to sexual activities through
public sex

enbies.jpg

But anyways, this discourse spread everywhere with people creating their own polls with absolutely absurd
results

1724744865822.png1724744965295.png

In conclusion: Tumblr people think random strangers having sex in the public shouldn't upset you, but
the line is crossed if you eat or drink the product you're planning to pay for or talk on the phone on a public transport.
:suffering:
 
Last edited:
In conclusion: Tumblr people think random strangers having sex in the public shouldn't upset you, but
the line is crossed if you eat or drink the product you're planning to pay for or talk on the phone on a public transport.
Weirdly, it makes perfect sense to me if you assume the users are middle to upper middle class suburban brats who worked in retail at any given point in their life.

Upper middle class suburban brats have rarely dealt with the homeless nuisance, so hypotheticals involving them they always fall on the “we must be caring” side of the equation.

On the other hand, anybody who has worked retail knows that motherfuckers aren’t going to pay for shit they opened. At best they’ll finish whatever they ate and leave wrappers everywhere. At worst they’ll eat part of it and discard the rest wherever it will rot the fastest.edit: Plus add in anytime somebody does one of those viral vids of opening ice cream, licking it, and putting it back, which then leads to the retail workers having to do extra by pulling all of the potentially contaminated merch and pitch it. I can see why people would be hostile.
 
anybody who has worked retail knows that motherfuckers aren’t going to pay for shit they opened. At best they’ll finish whatever they ate and leave wrappers everywhere. At worst they’ll eat part of it and discard the rest wherever it will rot the fastest
I always pay, I mostly do it to water cause my pills make mouth dry in a really gay sudden way
 
I always pay, I mostly do it to water cause my pills make mouth dry in a really gay sudden way
I've opened drink bottles on occasion. It gets rather warm during the summer months where I am, and the short distance from the cold section to the register can be unbearable to many. So long as consumption is swift and tidy, and the bottle is taken to the register and paid for, store managers rarely take exception to it.

Some of the larger grocery chains put baskets of apples and bananas out front, and kids are invited to take a piece and eat it for free while they trail their adults.



You can just tell that the morons saying, "I'm fine with strangers masturbating in public!" are picturing toned, waxed, athletic young bodies on display, with designer genitals. They're not thinking of some old, dirty, hirsute alco derelict wandering up to them with the overpowering scent of old urine, and whiping out a mangled dick that resembles nothing so much as a decomposing witchetty grub.

While attitudes to sexuality are as varied as the human species itself, even the most permissive and open cultures generally ask that you practice some semblance of discretion. Voyeurism is in itself a sexual act, and forcing it on others has unpleasant connotations. (Also, won't someone think of the children etc)
 
So a user decided to make this poll
Polls really bring the crazies out of the woodwork. There's been one going around recently where the question is 'Would you fuck sans undertale' and it's 30% yes, 70% no with a large number of votes and an absolute war going on in the reblogs over everything from consent to users accusing other users of being mentally disturbed, all over a fictional skeleton that tumblr itself voted ultimate #1 sexyman of all time.
 
I feel like it slightly depends on "where" in public. It's gross either way, but there's a difference between fucking in the middle of a busy street and a couple weirdos in some back alley somewhere. Like, is it actually in front of everyone, or is it somewhere you wouldn't usually see but might accidentally stumble upon because it's still outside?

As I said, gross either way but I feel like some people are imagining different kinds of "in public,", one of which is arguably less offensive than the other. Tumblr doesn't really know what nuance is though.

My two cents? Don't fuck outside in a city.
 
I feel like it slightly depends on "where" in public. It's gross either way, but there's a difference between fucking in the middle of a busy street and a couple weirdos in some back alley somewhere. Like, is it actually in front of everyone, or is it somewhere you wouldn't usually see but might accidentally stumble upon because it's still outside?

As I said, gross either way but I feel like some people are imagining different kinds of "in public,", one of which is arguably less offensive than the other. Tumblr doesn't really know what nuance is though.

My two cents? Don't fuck outside in a city.
That's the red herring: homeless people don't particularly want to be seen having sex any more than anyone else does just on the basis of being homeless (yes there is some overlap of homeless and degenerates, but I'm not talking about that right now). They want privacy too. So it's obviously a gotcha and I'd almost think that op was trolling, except that tumblr is full of sex offenders and manipulators. That is, the homeless thing is just a way to try to make you feel bad for disagreeing. I think it's called a motte and bailey fallacy, where he's definitely talking about indecent exposure and flashing, but retreats by saying he's making a point about caring about the homeless. The mention of drive-by shootings is called whataboutism. PL I used to volunteer at shelters and everyone I personally worked with at least would hate to be used by this sex pest to make his pedo point.
 
@Inside your walls aside from the question itself and the poll ratio being insane, what's the point of asking for people's opinion on a yes or no matter if you're just going to attack anyone who disagree with you? Don't ask questions if you don't want answers.
Also, it all remind me of this furry that plastered futa porn on his city's buildings and when receiving backlash, claimed it was "artistic nudity" like the paintings you see in a museum.
 
Atanarjuat: The Fast Runner (2001) is based on Inuit oral history, and is the first movie filmed in Inuktitut. A period piece set roughly 1000-2000 years ago, everything about this movie is phenomenal - the costumes, props, sets, acting, music, cinematography - even the sex scenes are hot. You can tell the care and passion that went into every detail of the production, from start to finish.

The best thing about this movie is how un-American it feels (or maybe I should say un-Canadian.) There’s no hesitation to break the colonialist, puritanical taboos that Hollywood movies have normalized throughout mainstream cinema. We get plenty of animal violence, we see women processing carcasses to be eaten, there’s full frontal male nudity, even tits. There’s no catering to a European audience whatsoever. I wish there were a thousand movies like this.
One look at Wikipedia shows at how massively successful that film is.
I honestly feel tha those 'puritanical' taboos are lon gone, now.
 
Back