Random Tumblr posts

Operator Kyoko Sakura said:
According to this special snowflake, if you're an anti-radfem, you're a furry brony rapist.

11988583_965227270185083_1307522136167450859_n.jpg


Funny she says that considering white knights and radfems are into that shit.
Click to expand...
Well, she said "on this site",talking about tumblr, so, she's not really wrong.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: bowow, DirkBloodStormKing and Rin
Meowthkip said:
I'm not attracted to gingers. Does that make me a racist or is that an acceptable, SJW-approved preference?

I'm asking because I've never seen it brought up ever.
Click to expand...

They'll probably be shat on since most of them are white. I'm saying this as a white ginger myself.

plasticine said:
does anyone remember that fairly odd parents episode where this exactly happened? and everything went to shit because they didn't have each other to fall back on?
Click to expand...

Yeah, it was called "Love Struck".
 
  • Feels
Reactions: bowow, UnsufficentBoobage and Meowthkip
So many of these tumblrisms fall into the same pattern. They—or their proxy—are the victim of undeserved harm that was, or still is, inflicted upon them because of their identity. Therefore, they are deserving of attention and sympathy from their peers. When criticized, they take a moral high ground and claim that they only seek justice, and use their identity as a shield against the consequences of their actions. Likewise, it makes going on the attack socially permissible, because it’s done in self-defense.

Therefore, there is a need to assume the posture where one can claim more and greater victimhood. Hence the tendency to identify as trans-everything. It enables them to sidestep their own privileges and claim other group’s victim status as their own.

However, justice is not the objective. If an unjust situation were to be resolved, there would be no more grievance, and no more ability to play at being the victim. It is far easier to keep swapping stories of oppression within a circle of like-minded enablers to stave off not only criticism, but any perception at all that they world is not as they say it is. As long as the internet points keep flowing, there is no need for self-reflection.

Imagine a child who has a severe case of helicopter parents. The child learns that they can have their parents intervene against any slight and correct any grievance, whether real, perceived, or even outright fabricated. In online social justice, the group takes on the role of surrogate parent, offering endless praise and admiration for tweets and posts that air a grievance, no matter how improbable. And like with helicopter parents, the child’s self-worth has become inexorably linked to the approval of the group, making escape impossible.

In more extreme cases of this mentality, the person becomes convinced that their victimhood is unavoidable and omnipresent. Here's an example that illustrates this point. This article states that not only do women lack agency in their lives, they can never have agency. Rape isn’t only inevitable, it’s irresistible. Unless you’re a straight, white, upper-class, cisgendered, able-bodied male, you have nothing to look forward to except a lifetime of being raped. Nothing you can do about it. Every slight or misfortune you suffer is just further evidence of the hand of the misogynistic Patriarchy at work, and dooms you to forever be a loser at the game of life due to your gender (or race, sexuality, etc.), and you are powerless to stop it.

When you blame your unhappiness on an external oppressor, you make it harder for you to get better. All you see is potential harm everywhere you look, and you have to constantly keep your guard up against it. It's a painful and exhausting way to live. You don't build self-worth by portraying yourself as a victim and indulging in wish-fulfillment fantasies. SJWs only reinforce these distortions, either as a way to shield yourself from bad feelings or to give yourself an inflated sense of moral superiority. Or money, in the case of certain Twitter demagogues. As long as you continue to blame everything but themselves for their misery, you'll always be unhappy. Learn to accept yourself instead of needing validation from someone else.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: bowow, UnsufficentBoobage, TenaflyViper and 8 others
Wallace said:
So many of these tumblrisms fall into the same pattern. They—or their proxy—are the victim of undeserved harm that was, or still is, inflicted upon them because of their identity. Therefore, they are deserving of attention and sympathy from their peers. When criticized, they take a moral high ground and claim that they only seek justice, and use their identity as a shield against the consequences of their actions. Likewise, it makes going on the attack socially permissible, because it’s done in self-defense.

Therefore, there is a need to assume the posture where one can claim more and greater victimhood. Hence the tendency to identify as trans-everything. It enables them to sidestep their own privileges and claim other group’s victim status as their own.

However, justice is not the objective. If an unjust situation were to be resolved, there would be no more grievance, and no more ability to play at being the victim. It is far easier to keep swapping stories of oppression within a circle of like-minded enablers to stave off not only criticism, but any perception at all that they world is not as they say it is. As long as the internet points keep flowing, there is no need for self-reflection.

Imagine a child who has a severe case of helicopter parents. The child learns that they can have their parents intervene against any slight and correct any grievance, whether real, perceived, or even outright fabricated. In online social justice, the group takes on the role of surrogate parent, offering endless praise and admiration for tweets and posts that air a grievance, no matter how improbable. And like with helicopter parents, the child’s self-worth has become inexorably linked to the approval of the group, making escape impossible.

In more extreme cases of this mentality, the person becomes convinced that their victimhood is unavoidable and omnipresent. Here's an example that illustrates this point. This article states that not only do women lack agency in their lives, they can never have agency. Rape isn’t only inevitable, it’s irresistible. Unless you’re a straight, white, upper-class, cisgendered, able-bodied male, you have nothing to look forward to except a lifetime of being raped. Nothing you can do about it. Every slight or misfortune you suffer is just further evidence of the hand of the misogynistic Patriarchy at work, and dooms you to forever be a loser at the game of life due to your gender (or race, sexuality, etc.), and you are powerless to stop it.

When you blame your unhappiness on an external oppressor, you make it harder for you to get better. All you see is potential harm everywhere you look, and you have to constantly keep your guard up against it. It's a painful and exhausting way to live. You don't build self-worth by portraying yourself as a victim and indulging in wish-fulfillment fantasies. SJWs only reinforce these distortions, either as a way to shield yourself from bad feelings or to give yourself an inflated sense of moral superiority. Or money, in the case of certain Twitter demagogues. As long as you continue to blame everything but themselves for their misery, you'll always be unhappy. Learn to accept yourself instead of needing validation from someone else.
Click to expand...
Where's the rating for "you took six paragraphs to say what could have been said in ten sentences"?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: bowow, puzzlemasterPandora, FramerGirl420 and 5 others
AnOminous said:
I assume you mean David Reimer.

They didn't do it to be sick fucks, like this scumbag who should have CPS called on them is. There was a surgical accident at birth, specifically, a botched circumcision.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer

The parents were also misled by one of the scummiest doctors ever to live, Dr. John Money, who was basically a quack pushing a "sex is just a social construct" theory, and willing to do unethical human experiments to "prove" it. For years, they trotted out David Reimer as a "successful" sex reassignment, even though he was miserable and never felt himself to be female.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money

Money shows the truly horrific damage that can be done by ideologues who treat medicine and the care of others as a playing field to push a non-medical, purely social agenda.
Click to expand...
I think every parent who's trying to force their kids to be transgendered should have David Reimer's story shoved into their faces until they understand what they're doing is toxic.

If they don't learn anything and continue to do their shit, then it's time to call CPS.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: bowow, Too Many Crooks and Ho Mo for Women
Wallace said:
Perhaps I've been in academia too long.
Click to expand...

English major here:

We're always taught to say what we say in as few words as possible. Be concise, be descriptive, and be accurate.

That's not academia, that's snootiness and attempting to try and show off superior intellect.

Say it in less words, seem more intelligent. More words just makes you look like you're beating around a bush.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: bowow, puzzlemasterPandora, Asa_Spades60 and 4 others
Doctor Professor Timon said:
English major here:

We're always taught to say what we say in as few words as possible. Be concise, be descriptive, and be accurate.

That's not academia, that's snootiness and attempting to try and show off superior intellect.

Say it in less words, seem more intelligent. More words just makes you look like you're beating around a bush.
Click to expand...
I just don't want to read posts that long.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: bowow, Fiddleford, yasscat and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back