Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
AnOminous said:
Like this:

"GG is right-wing, of that I have no doubt."

You have no doubt, but you have no evidence whatsoever.

It's like he never saw this:

View attachment 62559

But because a tiny cadre of social justice thugs say so, it must be right wing.
Click to expand...

Yeah but that survey was filled out by conservative gamergaters. Conservatives all know that conservatism is wrong and all their views are wrong, so they lied on a survey and pretended to be liberals to try and trick people into thinking they're left-wing and therefore correct about gamergate.

And the onus is on gamergaters to disprove that.

Because we're the rational ones.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Jangle Jingleheimer, Saturnalia-1918, BountifulFeast and 13 others
Dynastia said:
Yeah but that survey was filled out by conservative gamergaters. Conservatives all know that conservatism is wrong and all their views are wrong, so they lied on a survey and pretended to be liberals to try and trick people into thinking they're left-wing and therefore correct about gamergate.

And the onus is on gamergaters to disprove that.

Because we're the rational ones.
Click to expand...

Are we supposed to prove that particular negative before or after we use our countless sockpuppet accounts to push our agenda (because we're totally 30 people) and then show we have more influence and manpower than the fucking postal service (because 30 people are also thousands)? It gets really hard for me to keep all our illuminati Gobberdygate rules in order.

I may need to re-order the handbook.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: GREEDY FIREMAN, Sanae Kochiya, DrJonesHat and 1 other person
Jaimas said:
Are we supposed to prove that particular negative before or after we use our countless sockpuppet accounts to push our agenda (because we're totally 30 people) and then show we have more influence and manpower than the fucking postal service (because 30 people are also thousands)? It gets really hard for me to keep all our illuminati Gobberdygate rules in order.

I may need to re-order the handbook.
Click to expand...

fuck off and stop sealioning me, misogynist. I hope you literally die in a fire.
 
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Like
Reactions: GREEDY FIREMAN, Trombonista, Sanae Kochiya and 4 others
@Jaimas

  • Someone actually threatened to shoot up a school because of her and because of video games.[7] And no, it wasn't a "Brazilian clickbait blogger".[8]
This one should be easy for you. It's in "List of Gamergate Claims". That Brazilian clickbait blogger should really be expanded on if they're going to mention him at all, right?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GREEDY FIREMAN, Have a Pepsi and Jaimas
Dynastia said:
@Jaimas

  • Someone actually threatened to shoot up a school because of her and because of video games.[7] And no, it wasn't a "Brazilian clickbait blogger".[8]
This one should be easy for you. It's in "List of Gamergate Claims". That Brazilian clickbait blogger should really be expanded on if they're going to mention him at all, right?
Click to expand...

I daresay they should.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GREEDY FIREMAN, Sanae Kochiya and Have a Pepsi
Randall Fragg said:
@Jaimas @Dynastia could you take your "It's about ethics in journalism goddamnit" crusade into a PM please? Thank you.
Click to expand...

It's actually about flushing Ryulong back out. He belongs to us. He's ours. He can't just leave forever and disappear. Not until he's stopped entertaining me.

If I have to throw on purple and green tinfoil to do that, you know I will.
 
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Winner
Reactions: GREEDY FIREMAN, Sanae Kochiya, Randall Fragg and 10 others
Oh, man, that Gamergate talk page.

"Hey gamergaters, come discuss things with us! Ryulong is gone, don't worry about his meatpuppet buddyloid willing to sperg in his place."
*People start making comments*
"It's all been debunked you reactionary, right-wing, sociopaths!"

A medium article is not a reliable source as they can be written by anyone. Essentially, you're advocating for video game journalists to lack any sort of social life within their field. This sort of stuff happens all the time in any given journalistic field. It is not apparent of any ethical breach. It is par for the course. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 04:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

This page currently cites six different medium articles, is this a proposal to remove them? 64.38.194.13 (talk) 16:58, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Click to expand...

dollarhuviya said:
Whoever that is must be a massive tard.
Click to expand...

Adam seems to be just as invested into Gamergate as Ryulong (was it on the Farms that someone called GG a magnet for autists?), and has been sperging about it for over a year now on reddit/twitter/disqus/etc.

Whatever disorders Adam has makes him insufferable to interact with, should be lots of laughs in the future.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Randall Fragg, Wally Balljacker, Jaimas and 2 others
(diff | hist) . . Talk:Gamergate‎; 00:22 . . (+294)‎ . . ‎Kitsunelaine (Talk | contribs)‎ (→‎A Post Again Part III: The [Misplaced] Salt Must Flow: Baal, you don't get to remove something you've said after someone responded to it. [see ref: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&diff=1588162&oldid=1588158])

(Block log); 00:27 . . Kitsunelaine (Talk | contribs) blocked Kitsunelaine (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 31416 seconds (about 9 hours) (autoblock disabled) ‎(Can someone else deal with the gator trolls FCP so kindly directed at our site for now? I have other things I gotta do today. Thanks!)
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: Jaimas and APerson
At this point I'm seriously wondering if Ryulong is just posting from Kitsunelain's account at least *some* of the time...

Dynastia said:
But I don't really care. I just have to ask ; If you guys are making allegations about a person citing a post from a fringe subreddit (let alone a deleted post from a fringe subreddit), and then respond to his request to remove it by immediately banning him, mocking him, posting his whiny emails and laughing about what a butthurt crybaby he is, I really have to ask... are you trying to be a smugger, unfunnier version of ED? Because even lolcow.wiki doesn't treat our subjects that badly when they dispute content, and we take pride in what absolute heinous assholes we are.

Is this kind of shit okay with you? Seriously?
Click to expand...

I was away for a few days, but from what I gather he made some legal threats and was banned on account of that. Had he just said "yo, this is not accurate and based on this deleted reddit post!" it would probably have been fine... But yeah, this is the sort of overreaction we get only on GG stuff. Just delete the paragraph and move on.

AnOminous said:
It is, simply, not an encyclopedic resource.
Click to expand...

Indeed its not, and it doesn't claim to be. "Wiki" simply means "page anyone can edit", not "encyclopaedia".
 
WhoopieDoo said:
At this point I'm seriously wondering if Ryulong is just posting from Kitsunelain's account at least *some* of the time...
Click to expand...

Somebody said he was a confirmed as a Ryulong sock on wikipedia, but I couldn't find anything to back that up. His internet footprint is extensive enough that I strongly doubt it.

WhoopieDoo said:
I was away for a few days, but from what I gather he made some legal threats and was banned on account of that. Had he just said "yo, this is not accurate and based on this deleted reddit post!" it would probably have been fine... But yeah, this is the sort of overreaction we get only on GG stuff. Just delete the paragraph and move on.
Click to expand...

He'd already been banned before he sent that email. He showed up, listed a bunch of shit you'd said about him that he claimed was incorrect along with a fairly polite request for people to remove his middle name (Collingwood), and he received "You're not getting your way, Collingwood", then an immediate coop case brought up to ban him on the grounds of him being a serious terrifying threat to RW that must be immediately removed, and then after his ban he sent an email to David Gerard threatening to take vague legal action to remove what he called libel against his person, which was then posted and further mocked.

I mean, don't get me wrong. I like ED. If you guys are just trying to be ED that's fine. You should nut up and admit it though, and maybe ask @LikeicareKF for some advice on how to actually be funny.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GREEDY FIREMAN, Splendid, LikeicareKF and 1 other person
WhoopieDoo said:
Indeed its not, and it doesn't claim to be. "Wiki" simply means "page anyone can edit", not "encyclopaedia".
Click to expand...

It claims in its policies that being "factually accurate" is important, something which is just plain not the case.

Dynastia said:
Somebody said he was a confirmed as a Ryulong sock on wikipedia, but I couldn't find anything to back that up. His internet footprint is extensive enough that I strongly doubt it.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure he's a meat puppet and not a sock puppet.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Have a Pepsi and Hellfire
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back