Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

I argued (over email) with the mods to *not* permanently block Arisbosch for exactly this reason. The Powers That Be™ chose differently, and I decided not to pursue the matter any further. Quoting myself from that conversation:



At any rate, simple decency should be enough to acknowledge that Arisbosch was engaging in a very grey area; rules aren't required for this.
There really should be much more transparency from them about this instead of trying to muddy the waters with regards to what is acceptable and unacceptable over there.
 
At any rate, simple decency should be enough to acknowledge that Arisbosch was engaging in a very grey area; rules aren't required for this.

Quite the opposite. Gray areas are where rules are needed the most. Otherwise you're creating situations where punishment is handed down based on the personal feelings of the moderator. Those the mods like will escape severe punishment, those the mods do not will have the book thrown at them. Don't say this won't happen at RW, David Gerard is already using his unquestioned status to practice this exact thing.
 
Quite the opposite. Gray areas are where rules are needed the most. Otherwise you're creating situations where punishment is handed down based on the personal feelings of the moderator.

I agree; which is exactly why I proposed amending the rules (FCP's reversal seems to be more of a matter of procedure, rather than actual disagreement). That sentence was more intended as a reply to Arisbosch's denial that he was engaging in a grey area at all.
 
Quite the opposite. Gray areas are where rules are needed the most. Otherwise you're creating situations where punishment is handed down based on the personal feelings of the moderator. Those the mods like will escape severe punishment, those the mods do not will have the book thrown at them. Don't say this won't happen at RW, David Gerard is already using his unquestioned status to practice this exact thing.

Yeah, there's a user here who doxed @Null and then paid for two (three now?) DDoS attacks on us, started up a wikia to libel him as a anal-vore-loving pedophile, and recently bombed his newest imageboard with CP then reported it to FBI. He's not even banned because the site owner loves him so much.

This is why you need proper policy laid out for grey-area type behaviour such as that.

https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/rationalwiki_gaze-jpg.60054/

It's true I literally caught autism from this forum.
 
@systemlord_baal @WhoopieDoo You both know it's true

https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/rationalwiki_gaze-jpg.60054/


Rationalwiki is dead. The moment it decided one kind of dogma was too "special" to critique or mock, it died and became conservapedia's retard child. They have their own Kenneth D Meyer (Ryulong), their own set of wannabe dictator sysops banning any and all "heresy", and the nigh impossible depths of myopia and cluelessness that they long derided in conservapedia

Face it ratwik spastics. You are now as bad as Schlafly, Hurlbutt, TK and every other wingnut you once mocked. Fuck, you are actually even worse come to think of it. those speds were born in authoritarian autism. you willingly embraced it just to "fit in" with other fucktards
 
Ja pierdole, some coward permablocked be AGAIN. Did they burn the bridges completely? Is it time to lay low for a while and come back with a sock?
 
Don't worry, I don't think, that banning me just because of Mona pulling a "guilt by association" and David Gerard agreeing will go without disagreement when the mods are back from the holidays. And if they don't unban me, well, it's not as if I gonna explode because of that, right?

What's funny is throwing someone off RationalWiki is just like Scientologists disconnecting from someone because they associate with "Suppressive Persons."

David Gerard learned well from the cult during his time as a critic of them.

You must also remember the context that Arisbosch behaviour is typically abrasive and tends to hurl personal insults at people he doesn't like (like calling David "a Pinochet" here; seriously, wtf dude?) . Can you blame RW for not wanting to work alongside someone like that?

Get fucking real.

That's mild as fuck compared to the torrents of obscenities and abuse Ryushlong showers upon anyone with who disagrees with him even slightly.

Hypothetically, if terrorists hid a nuclear bomb in the middle of a densely populated city and the only way to stop them was to dox somebody on the internet would you do it?

If a lolcow was chimping out in a crowded city square and the only way to make him even madder was to dox him, would you?
 
Last edited:
ILikeKiwis tried to give Gooniepunk a gift from the Farms.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: chimpburgers
Back