Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

Dynastia said:
He also voted 'yes' to banning Adam on behalf of his 'enemies' and got into a minor edit war over that.
These people are fucking chimpanzees lol
Click to expand...
Stop insulting chimpanzees!

HipstrsGonnaHip said:
He we see Castaigne being the tough guy in RW that he's too cowardly to be in real life
View attachment 73520
Click to expand...
Hey, RW is a place full of Internet Tough Guys, what do you expect? You see, I love to occasionally read their stuff about pseudoscience, conspiracy theories and so on, but because of shit like this I won't join there. I have no stomach for that kinda nonsense.
 
  • TMI
  • Informative
Reactions: Hellfire and lolwut
HipstrsGonnaHip said:
He we see Castaigne being the tough guy in RW that he's too cowardly to be in real life

View attachment 73521
View attachment 73520
Click to expand...

I wonder if he ever threatens to slap the two guys that fuck his fat wife, or does he just lower his head and say nothing about not really being okay with it.

Except I don't wonder that at all because it's obviously the latter.

Andrew "I have no flight response" Stallings gets called out.

mQOWbk4.png


Immediately showcases his flight response by deleting the comment and banning the evil twoll. What a literal cuck whose fat wife cucks him irl and he's not completely okay with it.

jK2HklE.png
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, Hellfire, lolwut and 2 others
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: PantsOfDesire, Francis York Morgan, Hellfire and 2 others
Dynastia said:
He's getting salty that people keep deleting his tantrum. Also he seems to think weaseloid is deleting his tantrum because he read about it here? idk

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weaseloid&curid=69484&diff=1628519&oldid=1628512

Either way it's confirmation he's still reading this thread religiously and feeling asshurt about his fat wife cucking him with two other guys while he's really not quite a hundred percent okay with that. This is great.
Click to expand...

I'd thought these spastics had calmed down and stopped chimping for a bit.

Still, Cuckstain's wife is fat and I would not cuck him with her.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: PantsOfDesire, Francis York Morgan, Hellfire and 3 others
Dynastia said:
He's getting salty that people keep deleting his tantrum. Also he seems to think weaseloid is deleting his tantrum because he read about it here? idk

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weaseloid&curid=69484&diff=1628519&oldid=1628512

Either way it's confirmation he's still reading this thread religiously and feeling asshurt about his fat wife cucking him with two other guys while he's really not quite a hundred percent okay with that. This is great.
Click to expand...
They never change their ways and they somehow get crazier overtime.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hellfire, lolwut and fuehrer_dessler
Does anyone get the impression that @TombRaiderFan is still a little mad at us because we wouldn't become his personal army?

upload_2016-2-15_12-30-55.png


What was the name of his account on RW anyways? I can't remember.

Dynastia said:
Also he seems to think weaseloid is deleting his tantrum because he read about it here? idk
Click to expand...

Senpai continues to notice us!

Don't worry, we still notice you too uguu~
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: chimpburgers, APerson and Hellfire
Castaigne got so pissy that Carpetsmoker is treating him like the petulant child he's acting like that he tried to ban Carpetsmoker for half a day

upload_2016-2-15_19-33-56.png


Key word is "tried". Carpetsmoker was still able to edit his talk page because Castaigne is a failure.
upload_2016-2-15_19-36-37.png


[EDIT]
Hey look! He did it again.
upload_2016-2-15_19-43-46.png
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, Hellfire and fuehrer_dessler
Hi Owlman!

Scared of Dynastia's sock army? http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...on_bar&curid=77683&diff=1628790&oldid=1628705

Policy question
So, in general, what is the block policy for new accounts who may have been created in order to influence coop decisions on this wiki even if they make useful contributions to this wiki. The reason I say this is because there have been several new user accounts created after we had our massive coop case.--Owlman (talk) 06:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
Reactions: chimpburgers
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back