Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

I love the paranoia on display.

upload_2016-2-16_11-55-14.png


I hope Kiwi Field Agents Kitsuelaine and Castaigne never get discovered. Without them I don't know how we would ever inspire so much drama and infighting among their ranks.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, Splendid, Ghostapplesause and 2 others
dollarhuviya said:
The second to last guy speaks the truth. They create at least 90% of the drama that's covered here, we're just here to document it and ridicule them. It's great. The "trolling" that's taken place has been simple stuff really. It's their over the top reaction to it that also makes it funny.
Click to expand...

This is exactly why RW found Conservapedia funny for so long. There was the initial trolling, but later we got our drama from the paranoid drama that fed on their fortress mentality. There's no need to do large scale trolling. All you need is a little sock that can occasionally be used to rile-up someone when it gets too quiet.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Kebab and Calculator and fuehrer_dessler
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Forum:How_the_heck_do_I_talk_to_an_otherkin_friend?
Well, I have a friend who considers himself an otherkin/therian. I think that stuff is weird but I don't want to tell him that I'm weirded out by it. I've mostly been saying "interesting" or "cool" to his stuff while dreading Skype conversations. Anyone have any tips on talking/coping? Ru1138 (talk) 18:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

talk to them like you would any other human being whose beliefs/interests do not affect you in any way. AMassiveGay (talk) 18:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Well... he's also trying to get me to do stuff I'm uncomfortable with. He thinks dream sharing is a thing and he wants us to meet up. I just get anxious around him. Ru1138 (talk) 19:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Then, yeeeeeah I'd say try to let him down gently. Like, "Hey, I think it's really cool that you've found what works for you and all, but I'm not really comfortable doing something like this." Chances are, they might not get the hint and you may need to be a little more blunt -- I've had a number of online friends like this myself. I'd also recommend switching to more neutral tone rather than the this-could-come-off-sounding-like-I'm-fascinated-in-a-medium-without-vocal-signals tone of "interesting" or "cool". Something more like "I see", or "That so?", or "Huh."

Then again, I'm probably not the best person to ask -- I can be as blunt as the wrong end of an axe and too milquetoast to be anywhere close to confrontational about it to someone who might be using it as a mental crutch. ℕoir LeSable (talk) 19:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Okay, I'll keep that in mind. Thank you. Ru1138 (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...
 
HipstrsGonnaHip said:
View attachment 73702

FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT
Click to expand...

And the salt keeps flowing. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...laine&curid=172819&diff=1629211&oldid=1629207

As if Adam has any right to criticize their contributions when he does jack all and went to RW solely to back up Cohen.

Someone tells Adam he is being too harsh on Sarah and interpreting everything she does as an attack. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...laine&curid=172819&diff=1629221&oldid=1629213

If she contributes more during times of drama, she also contributes to moderate or calm drama. You just read her as attacking. I can sort of understand why, but you can also read her as offering constructive advice (her true intent, I think). So, ya' know, try turning down the defenses a little, please. It wasn't hostility so it didn't require striking back. MarmotHead (talk) 05:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

Adam continues to sperg in response. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...laine&curid=172819&diff=1629222&oldid=1629221

The user in question only has interest in fanning the flames. That much is painfully obvious if you look at their contributions, and the fact that they tried to dig up this almost two days after it had settled down. - Kitsunelaine 「SJW Illuminati shill.」 05:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

Adam is butthurt that Sarah has called him out for being a problem. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...laine&curid=172819&diff=1629223&oldid=1629222

and the fact that they tried to dig up this almost two days after it had settled down. Plus I don't think someone who wrote this has my best interests at heart. - Kitsunelaine 「SJW Illuminati shill.」 05:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

Carpetsmoker waded through Adam's salt pile to get a few jabs in: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...f=1629274&oldid=1629272#Making_RW_Great_Again

That's probably because you show no sign of having this site or its community's best interests at heart, only pushing an agenda on a very narrow range of topics. I know of at least four editors who left because of you and the like of you (myself included), and there are probably many more people who silently left or, perhaps wisest of all, took one look and ran as fast as they could. Lets not even mention all the time wasted on the silly antics. All that, for the six paragraphs of text you contributed. Community builder indeed. Carpetsmoker (talk) 06:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Didn't you previously admit you left because of David saying you invited editors and not because of me? Also, don't you have better things to do than troll my userpage? Like start up that UberRationalWiki you wanted? - Kitsunelaine 「SJW Illuminati shill.」 06:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Yeah. that was the straw that broke the camel's back. But it's very obvious who put most of the weight there. Carpetsmoker (talk) 06:33, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

Adam got butthurt, once again showing zero self awareness.

Gotta go somewhere now, but I'll say this. You've painfully established what you think of me, Carpetsmoker. I've painfully established the reasons why you're wrong, many times, but that doesn't matter, as your beliefs are immovable. Please stop wasting this site's time in continuing a petty grudge and move on with life. k? k. Wish you all the best. Hope your RW alternative takes off. Won't be a part of it myself, of course, I would probably be banned on the spot if I tried. But I've no desire to continue these meaningless hostilities. - Kitsunelaine 「SJW Illuminati shill.」 06:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

I have a problem with people fucking over at least halfway decent educational resources for personal gain. Strange thing, that. Perhaps we should all let go of our "grudge" against Ray Comfort and leave the poor man alone and not write meany pages about him. We even call him banana man and allude to sexual intercourse with a banana. HARASSMENT! Carpetsmoker (talk) 06:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

And finally (as of this time), HuskyHarlot came back and almost guarantees a chimp out once Adam sees it.

K: we're guests in a house that Carpetsmoker and other proper editors built. You act as if RW were as much yours as it is his - it's not. You should thank him for making this place what it is and apologize when you step on his toes. Instead you tell him to leave? What the heck have to done here to earn that privilege? You can get to editing and EARN it or you can check it - one or the other. – Sarah (HH) 08:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Randall Fragg, The Kebab and Calculator, fuehrer_dessler and 1 other person
Hey RW: We all agree that Carpet Smoker is the admin you guys really need. He's so drama free that he's boring, and he actually seems to mostly respect RW's rules. Why the hell can't you see that? Almost all of your drama would go away overnight if you put him in charge.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, AnOminous, Randall Fragg and 3 others
fuehrer_dessler said:
Mods or just sysops? Cuckstain is a sysop and Adam Morland, too.
Click to expand...

I want them having as much authority on that site as possible. Almost everyone on rational wiki can be a sysop. I want them to be the sites moderators, too!

I want them wielding absolute power there. Those 4 would make the site everything they want it to be. It would be entertaining to us and irritating to anyone seeking to make the site functional or tolerable.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: lolwut and fuehrer_dessler
And the punishment they propose for Castaigne's behavior? Removal of sysop.


Whoop-de-doo

In other news, even Kitsu is ready to throw Castaigne under the bus

upload_2016-2-17_10-50-44.png

Even though I know no one who cares will ever see it, I'm willing to throw out an answer for Kitsu's question. Aneris is abrasive, but not abusive. The fact that Kitsu can't tell the difference does a lot to explain his friendship with Ryulong
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Randall Fragg, WhoopieDoo, Francis York Morgan and 1 other person
Splendid Meat Sticks said:
Hey RW: We all agree that Carpet Smoker is the admin you guys really need. He's so drama free that he's boring, and he actually seems to mostly respect RW's rules. Why the hell can't you see that? Almost all of your drama would go away overnight if you put him in charge.
Click to expand...
Of course by posting this, you guarantee that Carpetsmoker is getting banned in the near future. Don't worry, Carpetsmoker. We're always here if you want to vent about these retards.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Splendid, chimpburgers and fuehrer_dessler
Francis York Morgan said:
Of course by posting this, you guarantee that Carpetsmoker is getting banned in the near future. Don't worry, Carpetsmoker. We're always here if you want to vent about these retards.
Click to expand...
I don't think, that he'll do that or the very least not with an account, that easily identifiable as his.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back