Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

Cuckstain complains that TDA is "combative": http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Queex&curid=168372&diff=1633794&oldid=1633719

And almost a month after his banishment from Wikipedia he creates an account in here, continuing his obsessive edit warring over Gamergate. Does this remind you of someone? Typhoon (talk) 12:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Of Ryulong, perhaps?--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 15:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC) 15:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Got it. So because Ryulong, TDA's edits are correct and appropriate. --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

I created an account here after seeing my ban being misrepresented as having something to do with GamerGate when I have no reason to believe it related in any sense other than it being effectuated through a general remedy passed against me in the GamerGate case. As far as me "ignoring" the topic ban on Wikipedia, the more accurate assessment is that certain users wanted to make false or unsourced attacks against Eron Gjoni and I invoked the BLP exemption to my ban in order to remove those attacks, but while acknowledging they were indeed BLP violations admins whose conduct during GamerGate I had criticized decided the violations weren't serious enough to warrant invoking the exemption and blocked me with accusations that I was acting in bad faith by trying to remove said false or unsourced attacks. A couple months later, after I submitted to ArbCom a report about an admin who was violating the conflict of interest policies, the Committee declared that I was harassing editors and banned me indefinitely without ever telling me who they claimed I was harassing or even that they were talking about banning me.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 21:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

The Arbcom ruling said it was a long history of combative behavior. Judging from your editing here, I can see where they are coming from. --Castaigne2 (talk) 02:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 
  • Winner
Reactions: lolwut
You know, for as much shit as we've given Mona for being a hysterical anti-Semite, Kitsunelaine is so much worse for their community. Too bad they won't just ban his crazy transtrender ass.
 
You know, for as much shit as we've given Mona for being a hysterical anti-Semite, Kitsunelaine is so much worse for their community. Too bad they won't just ban his crazy transtrender ass.

When did Kitsunelaine turn into a tranny? Did I somehow miss that?

I thought he was just a retarded foxkin.
 
When did Kitsunelaine turn into a tranny? Did I somehow miss that?

I thought he was just a retarded foxkin.

Adam Morland.jpg


Probably latched on as a "transtrender" so he could get off on his fetish and make other spergs participate in the roleplays he's been drawing/writing about/acting out on IRC for years.

Remember that the 'Elaine' character he currently pretends to be on wikis/twitter/reddit/Gamerghazi IRC is a roleplay character he made years ago. (http://drunkfu.deviantart.com/art/Elaine-Commission-274812208)

@Adamska
 
When did Kitsunelaine turn into a tranny? Did I somehow miss that?

I thought he was just a retarded foxkin.
His shitty oc is always a beastgirl with wings and boobs. He is such a pathetic nignog he would regularly RP as the character in a variety of chats. Plus I do remember him actually stating at times that he wants to be a girl. He was so desperate for people to give him attention, he went out of his way to create this:
OZe9ZJu.jpg

He did this uninvited and most likely without any permission from the people in that room.
 
How long will it take for Mona to demand permabans for everysbody who ever dared disagree with the stupid Israel=Apartheid rag?
 
Not long. She can't quit sperging and she did even come back to the RW.

Mona plays dumb about Muslims throwing gays off rooftops.

It's encouraging to see reasonable people rejecting a prohibition on using EI as a source. I explained here why it's a perfectly acceptable journalistic outlet. As I peruse various actions/edits here in the last month I feel pretty good about the place. And no, I'm not saying I'm "back." So for those who'd welcome that, and the likely majority who would not, stay calm.---Mona- (talk) 21:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, it is so reassuring, that people here endorse online rags endorsing groups, that would've chucked the former from buildings given access.--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 13:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 13:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Um, what?---Mona- (talk) 16:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Didn't you say, you left and won't eva come back? --Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 16:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 16:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

No.I guess I did. That template says so -- but I didn't really read it. I didn't intend to do the "And I'm never coming back!" thing. Anyway, I'm not editing. And I still don't get your comment.---Mona- (talk) 17:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

You mean you don't edit in mainspace?--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 17:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 17:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

I mean I find your comment incoherent.---Mona- (talk) 17:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Remove all commas but the first one and replace "access" with "the opportunity". He's, for some reason, asserting Palestinian groups want to throw RW editors off of buildings. >.> 142.124.55.236 (talk) 19:01, 28 February 42016 AQD (UTC)

Huh. Well, I know a coupla Palestinians. They have some great garbanzo bean recipes I'm waiting on, so I won't tell them I've edited here until I get them. ---Mona- (talk) 19:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Jewhunter Mona is looking for Arisbochs.

Hmmm. I see a new account active here that evinces all the same style, interests and objections that a perma-banned fellow did. Arisboch hated citations to paywalled Haaretz (liberal Israeli paper) articles, and so does Kugelschreiber, in the same language! Imagine that.---Mona- (talk) 17:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Accusing people who disagree with of of being sock puppets again? Some things do not change, huh? Was this guy the only one to object to sources you can't read, unless you pay for them?--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 17:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 17:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Oh, I'm just letting you know I'm aware of who you are. No one else will care, so settle down. Besides, how do I know you disagree with me? Your comment makes no sense.---Mona- (talk) 18:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Huh, he even copied the links from Arisboch's sig. 142.124.55.236 (talk) 19:01, 28 February 42016 AQD (UTC)

Because I thought that these links are useful but the special characters look tacky? You think he'll sue me?--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 19:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 19:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

It's happened before.---Mona- (talk) 19:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Mona tries to explain that with Jews you lose.

Oh please Mona... Go to the fork of RW... They have been remarkably drama free until now. If you are right and your being here had nothing to do with all the drama that happened contemporaneously, there won't be any problem... Pizzameister (talk) 21:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Repeating your post hoc, ergo propter hoc argument ad nauseam doesn't make it any less fallacious, you know. 142.124.55.236 (talk) 21:47, 28 February 42016 AQD (UTC)

Repeating your lies about Mona being innocent won't make 'em true, either.--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 21:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 21:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

A tu quoque, eh? Not sure where I said anything about Mona being innocent or not, though. I just find it entertaining to point out her detractors' apparent inability to stop spouting one fallacy after another. 142.124.55.236 (talk) 22:05, 28 February 42016 AQD (UTC)

Claiming fallacies to divert attention of you lying.--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 22:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 22:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Oh, I'm "guilty" of disturbing the fanatically Zionist, pro-Israel status quo Avenger, Arisboch and a few others were imposing here last summer with their constant reverting and warring. No one seemed inclined to bring their shenanigans to heel. At one I-P article after another, I led an editing campaign to insert facts and documentation they find deeply unpleasant. I led it, but I was not alone in it (ChrisAmiss is especially good at much well-documented text). The results are: 1. Many I-P-related articles that are now in much better shape, with sound documentation, 2. Avenger and Arisboch are binned or banned. Well, you know: "binned" or "banned."---Mona- (talk) 22:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Pizzameister may cause an Adam Morland chimpout later on.

By the way. Someone who frequents websites that hate us (I won't name names) has told us that the reason they started to go after us is Ryulong, not Mona... Pizzameister (talk) 22:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Yeah that was always obvious. Ryulong has his own page on ED because of his reputation.--Owlman (talk) 22:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 
http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...rgate&curid=169712&diff=1634467&oldid=1633766

The Ryulong replacement that David Gerard recruited out of the GamerGhazi spergbox weights in on Alison Rapp.

February 29: After [https://np.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAct...try_alison_rapp_nintendo_treehouse_discusses/ targetting a Nintendo employee for months], GG attempts to [http://archive.is/vlgCG slander her through "google bombing"]. While moderators on KiA a[https://np.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAct...try_alison_rapp_nintendo_treehouse_discusses/ ttempt to uphold a facade of credibility], the majority of GG [https://np.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3q4ufe/alison_rapp_an_sjw_and_antigg_who_represents/ approves these tactics].
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Randall Fragg
Viewers of le [current year] show decided to go vandalize Trump's page at Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip...esy_of_Chrome_browser_Drumpfinator_-_heads-up

Adam wants to do the same thing at RW.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Donald_Trump&curid=116078&diff=1634542&oldid=1634517

Renaming the page Donald Drumpf?
Think this might be a fun idea. Make the current a redirect and change all instances of his name to Drumpf, but leave it as "aka Donald Trump" at the intro. - Kitsunelaine 「SJW Illuminati shill.」 01:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Oliver is great and all, but i don't know if enough people watch him to rename the whole page. I like it being an official AKA though. Petey Plane (talk) 02:12, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
So long as we link to it I think it should be fine. Our page on ISIS is called DAESH, which I'd wager a similar amount of people would understand the connotations of. The point of the Oliver piece was to point out how empty the Trump brand really is and then have a hand at rebranding him with something closer to reality. I feel like that's something we could help. - Kitsunelaine 「SJW Illuminati shill.」 03:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 
So what if the fork manages to avert all the drama... Wouldn't that draw many editors from RW over? And if they all go there wouldn't the drama start there just the same? Or do you think Carpetsmoker is better at drama aversion than David Gerard...

Depends. It could be Rightpedia, which forked Metapedia but carried over all the butthurt, drama generation, and retardation from it's even more stupid parent and is little better. Or, they could be All The Tropes, which goes out of its way to cut out most of the bigger sources of BS that TV Tropes allowed (like their forum culture, most of their fan wank shit, clear limits on keeping the moderation from becoming unchecked assholes like most of the TVT mods, etc.) to fester and actively discourages dragging drama into the day to day workings of the site.
 
Back