Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

Last edited:
Who knows, maybe he'll just come back under a new username and gets fast-tracked to mod by his buddies there?

He did say he didn't want to continue under the current persona, so he'll be back it seems.

Here ye, here ye!! On conclusion of the current moderator election, I will be stepping down as moderator. This is not a decision I made lightly, but the number of death threats emailed to me by those wonderful Gamergate-involved, hot-pocket consuming, socially-challenged jackasses has brought pause and reflection upon myself and my punkhouse. I have zero interest in video games (note: I found RW in 2008 when I was living homeless in a park across the street from my college). Furthermore, while it is now clear to me that Ryulong's assessment of Gamergators was subtle and rose-colored compared to mine, I don't care enough about Gators to fight them and continue to want to put minimal skin in the GG game. As such, while it violates 100% my old-guard inclinations of social libertarianism on RationalWiki, I place my faith and endorsement behind any moderator candidate seeking either to mothball and erase that section of RW ir, contrapositively, behind any moderator candidate opposing turning RW into another playground for pro-GGers.

As for me? I will continue to support RW by all means as a part of the rationalist movement. But I cannot put a stake in what the would-be doxxers find out or know about me enough to want to continue on RW in the current persona. It's not that RW means that little to me but, rather, that I mean that little to the overall cause of rationalisn itself.
 
Gerard MUST defend his hugbox:

(Protection log); 17:31 . . David Gerard (Talk | contribs) changed protection level for "RationalWiki:chicken coop"‎ ‎[edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) ‎[move=moderator] (indefinite) ‎(this page is not a place for drivebys)

That was in response to someone opening a coop case about a RW user that admitted he was a pedophile and is using the Japanese word for pedophile as his user name.

https://archive.is/z0InZ#selection-1007.1-1007.64

I think, as Ikanreed suggests above, that the issue of concern here is (not exclusively) but atleast first and foremost: is this user pushing any type of paedo apologist agenda onto the actual page in any way, shape or form? If so, throw him and his edits to the dogs for all I care. If not, well, the discussion certainly continues. But the point that shouldn't be missed is that this isn't a discussion on our stance on paedo apology - we have zero tolerance for that. This is a discussion on if this japanese name is appropriate. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 16:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

No, it isn't any of those things. It's just concerns trolls popping out of the woodwork to JAQ & try to stir up trouble over things they read about us on Reddit, KiwiFarms, etc. ωεαşεζόίďMethinks it is a Weasel 16:39, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 
  • Informative
Reactions: chimpburgers
Given how these cowards keep running after their masks are removed, sounds like all anyone has to do to scare most of them away is dox them and see who will stand their ground.

They are used to fighting with quacks, fundies and the dregs of the conservative movement. They have never had a chan, reddit group or us interested in them.

I don't think they realize that as far as our doxing goes. (We have really been holding back a lot.) This little bit of interest was all it took for David Gerard to become everything he says is wrong with the world and all that he used to hate.
 
If all it takes is a few babydox thrown around for them to collapse into paranoia, infighting and running like little bitches, maybe they should have exhibited even the most basic levels of online security.
That would go against their narrative in wanting to be victim. Nothing is ever their fault. It has to be some boogieman out there for these dumb spergy cunts to blame so they can feel superior to everyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hellfire
lol so I decided to idly dig into another RW moderator candidate since the bounty's out on all of them, and started alphabetically.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ace_McWicked
http://sonichu.com/cwcki/User:Ace_McWicked FUCKING LOL!!!
https://twitter.com/AceMcWicked
https://acemcwicked.wordpress.com/
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/character/darkspear/Brobespierre/simple
https://xboxgamertag.com/search/Brobespierre/
http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198022225667

nuar0rj.png


Another Kiwi in both meanings of the word, this one is Dan from Wellington and actually exhibits some online PERSEC, as you'd expect anyone who's actually browsed the cwcki to do. His surname is kept quiet, he uses the stiffmeister as his avatar, and if he maintains a facebook it certainly isn't connected to any of his spergy online interests. There's an AceMcWicket linkedin claiming he's a manager for NZ tech but since when do linkedins use retarded internet names? No Dan's are listed as manager there, in any event. I don't think we're gonna dig up this guys irl surname but feel free to doublecheck for anything I've missed, I'm mainly posting it because his CWCKI account made me laugh out loud.

edit ; Relevant to our interests?
GXegfn4.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That dumb bitch Mona reverted his suggestion and edit.

(Block log); 21:47 . . -Mona- (Talk | contribs) blocked DaFuzz (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 31416 seconds (about 9 hours) (account creation disabled) ‎(constantly posting claims of pedophiles and now GG links about us)

OW, no wonder Gooniepunk hauled ass:

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3yp720/drama_rational_wiki_gabriel_holl_moderator/

Well, FuzzyCatPotato is actually doing something intelligent:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...aisha&curid=177923&diff=1597817&oldid=1597597

(User rights log); 22:01 . . FuzzyCatPotato (Talk | contribs) changed group membership for User:Shouniaisha from autopatrolled to sysoprevoke ‎(Revoking autopatrolled, to increase surveillance re:pedophilia if user begins to edit in future.)
 
Back