Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

Cuckstain is sperging out.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...otato&curid=159101&diff=1616782&oldid=1616231

Will you take care of that goddamn raving madwoman and move her vote to the appropriate policy space for consideration? Thanks in fucking advance. Also, see what you can do about her unilaterally deleting comments she doesn't like, if you don't mind. --Castaigne2 (talk) 03:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

(diff | hist) . . RationalWiki:chicken coop‎; 03:34 . . (+211)‎ . . ‎Castaigne2 (Talk | contribs)‎ (WHY DO YOU DELETE MY COMMENTS. DO YOU EVEN -READ- WHAT YOU'RE EDITING. STOP ACTING ON REFLEX AND PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT THE FUCK YOU'RE DOING.)

(Block log); 03:35 . . Castaigne2 (Talk | contribs) blocked -Mona- (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 3141 seconds (about 1 hour) (account creation disabled) ‎(Boring repetitive reversions)

(Block log); 03:35 . . -Mona- (Talk | contribs) unblocked -Mona- (Talk | contribs) ‎
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AnOminous and fuehrer_dessler
Hellfire said:
Cuckstain is sperging out.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...otato&curid=159101&diff=1616782&oldid=1616231



(diff | hist) . . RationalWiki:chicken coop‎; 03:34 . . (+211)‎ . . ‎Castaigne2 (Talk | contribs)‎ (WHY DO YOU DELETE MY COMMENTS. DO YOU EVEN -READ- WHAT YOU'RE EDITING. STOP ACTING ON REFLEX AND PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT THE FUCK YOU'RE DOING.)

(Block log); 03:35 . . Castaigne2 (Talk | contribs) blocked -Mona- (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 3141 seconds (about 1 hour) (account creation disabled) ‎(Boring repetitive reversions)

(Block log); 03:35 . . -Mona- (Talk | contribs) unblocked -Mona- (Talk | contribs) ‎
Click to expand...

Cumstain needs to quit mansplaining to a strong, independent woman.

He's clearly only doing this because she doesn't have a penis.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hellfire
We could cause the biggest shitstorm on that site just by trying to factually edit the Israel articles from a pro-Israeli point of view, no overt trolling required. We need our biggest autists on the case. Is @Jaimas available?
 
HipstrsGonnaHip said:
We could cause the biggest shitstorm on that site just by trying to factually edit the Israel articles from a pro-Israeli point of view, no overt trolling required. We need our biggest autists on the case. Is @Jaimas available?
Click to expand...

There are a lot of perfectly good and rational arguments that support Israel, actually.

If you've followed Wikipedia wars, you know that the literal JIDF actually basically won the Wikipedia war about Israel articles. I'm not kidding. As with most Wiki wars, the fight ended with a bunch of people on both sides banned from editing articles on the subject, but look up any article on Israel now.

It may not be as favorable to Israel as the real JIDF would want, but it's certainly pretty good from their perspective.

The same thing can be said about the Scientology articles. The Wiki war about those got brutal and ugly and had dozens of Requests for Arbitration and similar shit, and a bunch of people got banned.

But is Scientology really happy about the articles about them? Nope.

Israel is a good issue. Because a lot of these assholes on RW are outright anti-Semitic assholes using leftist politics as an excuse for the fact that they just hate Jews. (HI MONA!)
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: chimpburgers, vertexwindi, Ghostapplesause and 3 others
3yG75Ex.jpg


Guys, I think it's clear what the goal should be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Randall Fragg, lolwut and Francis York Morgan
I just realized. The holidays came and went without me posting the joke I was going to before the DDOS happened.

You'd better be black
and preferably not straight
you'd better believe
that Hitler was great
Admin Mona's coming to town~

Tip your waitress, Kiwis.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Rou, Ohoolihan, Sallet Lad Jim and 6 others
So basically, her whole snit boils down to "WAAAAAH SOMEONE DISAGREED WITH ME!!!"? Is that it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tsunderplane
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back