Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

Adamska said:
And because imgur ate my info dump and Adamu is causing shit again, I'm abusing Mega to show you guys Adamu's writing talent and art talent, since he's done pictures and comics. Hint: It's all shit.
https://mega.nz/#F!dc8y0AaZ!XNS0rJ1Asr3dvVrNb-X--g
Click to expand...

I forgot about this. Here's part of why Adam was chimping so hard tonight when HuskyHarlot was attacking Whor.

Creepymanchild.png
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Ohoolihan, Splendid, Randall Fragg and 2 others
All Bitchunelaine is good at is being an asshole to others for no reason and now he's so over his head that he thinks that he can actually do a VN. Get out of here. I also forgot how horrid his artwork is. Some of the worst shit I've ever seen.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hellfire
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Hellfire, fuehrer_dessler and Hellsperger
Hellfire said:
I forgot about this. Here's part of why Adam was chimping so hard tonight when HuskyHarlot was attacking Whor.

View attachment 74634
Click to expand...

That;s offensive on so many levels it's actually hard to keep track off not in the least because it's a Muslim making out with a Pagan God. How can you be such a creepy disrespectful fuck while claiming to on the social justice side?
 
Last edited:
  • Islamic Content
  • Agree
Reactions: Executive Impact, Moexlibu and Hellfire
Adam is one creepy little shit.

(diff | hist) . . Bernie Sanders‎; 03:19 . . (0)‎ . . ‎172.56.26.146 (Talk)‎ (kitsunelaine is a lame faggot and rapes little boys)
(diff | hist) . . Bernie Sanders‎; 03:24 . . (-8)‎ . . ‎172.56.27.103 (Talk)‎ (suck my dick you pussy asses)
(Block log); 03:25 . . Kitsunelaine (Talk | contribs) blocked 172.56.27.103 (Talk) with an expiry time of 3.14 months (ONLY spam/harassment/dox/legal threats) (account creation disabled) ‎(The female genitalia is actually pretty strong. It pumped you out, even. Why do you use it as a synonym for weakness?)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: fuehrer_dessler
upload_2016-2-24_19-53-31.png


Apparently Mona was the one who caught our attention? I guess we need to update the first post in this thread because
dollarhuviya said:
Inspired by the Ryulong thread that we have here and going over there recently to read one of the articles that they have, I think it's about time that a separate thread to cover some of the other stupidity that goes on that website is needed.
Click to expand...
is obviously incorrect.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Ghostapplesause, fuehrer_dessler, Francis York Morgan and 2 others
Francis York Morgan said:
Okay, I have to wonder what the deal is with them blatantly ignoring that it was Ryulong that brought the site to our attention. We've said it multiple times and yet it keeps getting overlooked.
Click to expand...
They can't trust us when we say that, though. Because we're Gamergaters. And you can never trust anything a 'gator says, including "we're not 'gators you fucking clowns".
 
  • Winner
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Blatant hypocrite, BlueChan, Hellsperger and 8 others
Francis York Morgan said:
Okay, I have to wonder what the deal is with them blatantly ignoring that it was Ryulong that brought the site to our attention. We've said it multiple times and yet it keeps getting overlooked.
Click to expand...

Because David Gerard will make your account disappear if you point out how freakish it is that Ryulong has been endlessly protected by him.
 
AnOminous said:
Because David Gerard will make your account disappear if you point out how freakish it is that Ryulong has been endlessly protected by him.
Click to expand...
Or ban yo ass under a flimsy pretext, he did both (I heard about some people not being able to log in anymore and there have been very substantiated rumors about Gerard, who has full access to the software RationalWiki runs on, having engineered these "software glitches" to get rid of ideological opponents).
 
fuehrer_dessler said:
Or ban yo ass under a flimsy pretext, he did both (I heard about some people not being able to log in anymore and there have been very substantiated rumors about Gerard, who has full access to the software RationalWiki runs on, having engineered these "software glitches" to get rid of ideological opponents).
Click to expand...
The problem with that is that RW runs on decidedly shitty software... So he has plausible deniability if nothing else...
 
  • Agree
Reactions: WhoopieDoo and fuehrer_dessler
Moexlibu said:
The problem with that is that RW runs on decidedly shitty software... So he has plausible deniability if nothing else...
Click to expand...
If you type "Special:Version"into the RationalWiki search box, you see, that the software version is "1.19.12". If you have a look at the Mediawiki version history page's history, you see, that this version was released approximately on the 28th February of 2014 (almost 2 fucking years), even though the most recent release is about 2 months old.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Ghostapplesause, Randall Fragg, PantsOfDesire and 4 others
  • Feels
Reactions: fuehrer_dessler
Cuckstain is still fighting over that Gamergate-connected lawyer. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Timeline_of_Gamergate#Mentioning_Kopyto.27s_side

"sometimes people in power abuse that power and no organization or disciplinary proceeding can be reasonably treated as free of taint" - The Devil's Advocate
Which I'm not seeing in the case of Kopyto, sorry.
"but you didn't seem to understand that Kopyto was not convicted in any court of law as there was never any court case" - The Devil's Advocate
I understand it quite well. Doesn't matter. He was disbarred by the Canadian version of the bar association. Good enough for me, since it's the correct procedure for such an issue.
"he makes a pretty compelling argument for why Koptyo's intentions matte" - The Devil's Advocate
And that's something you don't understand. Intentions never matter. Intentions never matter. Intentions never matter. So it doesn't matter how compelling the argument is. There is only what was done, and can it be proven. This is called being "evidence-based".
"Carey's point is that he also would have done so knowing he might be asking for less than he owed and the circumstances made it impossible for him to know for certain exactly how much time he had worked necessitating estimates that might not be precise. Were there no intent to gain money and it resulted in a net loss on his part then their only argument for misconduct falls apart." - The Devil's Advocate
Nope, sorry, still doesn't matter. It was against the rules. He broke the rules. He was punished for breaking the rules. That is all that matters. It's the only thing I care about. --Castaigne2 (talk) 06:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
Reactions: fuehrer_dessler and chimpburgers
fuehrer_dessler said:
If you type "Special:Version"into the RationalWiki search box, you see, that the software version is "1.19.12". If you have a look at the Mediawiki version history page's history, you see, that this version was released approximately on the 28th February of 2014 (almost 2 fucking years), even though the most recent release is about 2 months old.
Click to expand...

Their tech guy (Nx) quit back in February of 2014, and since then they've been stumbling along with a very old MediaWiki installation. Judging by the Apache version, Gerard has at least mastered the complexities of updating Ubuntu:

sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade

Nx returned this month, so we may be seeing some updates to their MediaWiki installation.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Moexlibu, Randall Fragg, fuehrer_dessler and 2 others
Manchild David Gerard joins in with Cuckstain and Ben Wright on this lawyer thing.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...rgate&curid=169714&diff=1633237&oldid=1633236

This is utterly fatuous. The point is that they couldn't even find a real lawyer to take this on, so hired someone disbarred for fraudulent billing. There's no way to add disclaimers and qualifiers to that that don't make it hilarious, and there is no reason to do so - David Gerard (talk) 10:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

(diff | hist) . . Timeline of Gamergate‎; 10:48 . . (+18)‎ . . ‎David Gerard (Talk | contribs)‎ (fucking stop it. nobody agrees with you on this.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back