RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

Syaoran Li said:
There's a handful of "old growth" articles about medical quackery that are still alright but those all predate the woke takeover of the site.



And now we're seeing the fundies start to slowly make a comeback except now they're calling themselves "traditionalists" all thanks to the pseudo-scientific dogmatic bullshit of wokester atheists.

Talk about a Pyrrhic Victory.
Click to expand...
The fedoras never won anything, it was always an entirely internet movement, even the flat earth movement managed to transform it's internet success around the same time into an irl organization/movement. The fedora movement was entirely ephemeral, nothing demonstrates this better than the growth of the Radical Right, who is often intrinsically religious, at the same time during the 2000s and the fact that many of the fedora movement would go on to support this movements and change their stances on religion.
 
Real Mayun said:
She’s been briefly covered on these forums before. Not sure if she strikes me as the type who hangs around rationalwiki. But who knows. I got in a trolling feud with her as theinterlang
Click to expand...
You give off highly spergy vibes.

I suggest completely leaving the internet until you make up on the social adjusting that should’ve happened in childhood and adolescence.
 
ToroidalBoat said:
how is "atheism+" different from just atheism?
Click to expand...
It's right in the name. It's atheism, plus social justice/intersectionalism/gender identity/whatever is the current-year thing. It was one of the more overt instances of entryism, taking over an existing sub-culture and turning it into just another hive of fragile, egotistic blowhards, who use their feeling of personal offence as a weapon to eject anyone that doesn't follow their ideology in every aspect. Atheism+ has literally nothing to do with atheism as a set of principles.
 
Hmm, I wonder what Trent Toulouse, founder of RationalWiki, actually looks like. I’m sure it won’t be stereoty-
IMG_7650.jpeg
Oh.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A good article has come out documenting one of the insane admins editing RationalWiki that just also happens to be a Wikipedia editor, David Gerard.
Drama Fan said:
It's probably just beating a dead horse for regulars of this thread, but I'll post it anyway because it's definitely relevant. TracingWoodgrains, independent journalist and former of Blocked and Reported producer, wrote quite a long article on wikipedia autist admin David Gerard and the blatant ways wikipedia uses Reliable Sources™ to launder narratives. Trigger Warning: very fucking long
https://www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/reliable-sources-how-wikipedia-admin (archive)
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom