Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

Thinking back, their hate of this place is so stupid I'm going to repeat what I said about Ryulong's "List of GamerGate claims" propaganda piece:

Fucking hypocrites. (technically "cowards" was the word used at the time, but their cowardice was the hypocrisy I was pointing out then)

They were the Kiwi Farms to Conservapedia back in the day. Sperging endlessly about every single damn thing, Andy Schlafly was their Chris-chan, had basically the same rules for Conservapedia we do for lolcow threads.

Reading some of the archives of the discussions they had on Conservapedia, it's downright spooky how much they acted like this place. They even had dedicated doxers for the Conservapedia sysops.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Troonologist PhD, Kamen Rider Black RX, Doseferatu and 6 others
The Decimator said:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Atheophobia

WHY CANT PEOPLE RESPECT US
Click to expand...
To be honest, although Atheism is popular on the internet, a majority of the US population say they'd never want an atheist president.

Still, as an atheist I've never been one for a victim complex and I can fully understand why people don't like this particular band of atheists. I know I don't.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Feline Darkmage and Syaoran Li
StraightShooter said:
I forgot to upload the screenshot, but on Valentine's Day when you tried to edit RationalWiki, you'd see a banner pop up which said "also don't forget about Single's Awareness Day"... no joke...
Click to expand...

It would be hard to be more :neckbeard: than that.

StraightShooter said:
This "essay" of theirs is cringeworthy:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Essay:I_thought_this_was_supposed_to_be_RATIONALWiki
Click to expand...

I like how they cherry pick for shit like white supremacy that most people will agree with them on, rather than shit like this. Yes, that's a six part series on controversies on MLP that triggered atheists and similar spergs. It's actually less autistic than it used to be.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Troonologist PhD, Feline Darkmage, SHITTAHS CLOGGED! and 3 others
AnOminous said:
It would be hard to be more :neckbeard: than that.



I like how they cherry pick for shit like white supremacy that most people will agree with them on, rather than shit like this. Yes, that's a six part series on controversies on MLP that triggered atheists and similar spergs. It's actually less autistic than it used to be.
Click to expand...
Did Ryulong write most of that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hellfire
StraightShooter said:
Did Ryulong write most of that?
Click to expand...

It's largely due to Ryulong's sperging that at least some of the autism ended up cut out of it. There used to be much more on the fedoralords who were triggered by the Pinkie Pie episode that kind of, sort of, if you looked at while cross eyed, might have somehow hinted at theism despite never once mentioning God.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Syaoran Li, StraightShooter and Hellfire
RationalWiki can be pretty bad. Though one thing is they don't "block" people like most Wikis. Troublemakers (like me when I was on a lolcow rage about Wikia) get placed in a "vandal bin" where we can only make one edit every 30 minutes to discourage vandalism, rather than banned permanently or for years.

Some wikias are pretty bad about that.... I was given a 3 year ban for spamming my own talk page on Simpsons wikia.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Troonologist PhD and Hellfire
Mr. Burgers said:
RationalWiki can be pretty bad. Though one thing is they don't "block" people like most Wikis. Troublemakers (like me when I was on a lolcow rage about Wikia) get placed in a "vandal bin" where we can only make one edit every 30 minutes to discourage vandalism, rather than banned permanently or for years.

Some wikias are pretty bad about that.... I was given a 3 year ban for spamming my own talk page on Simpsons wikia.
Click to expand...

They'd probably ban you now if you just admitted you ever posted here, though. They're afraid of us.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Troonologist PhD, Syaoran Li, Mr. Burgers and 2 others
Mr. Burgers said:
RationalWiki can be pretty bad. Though one thing is they don't "block" people like most Wikis. Troublemakers (like me when I was on a lolcow rage about Wikia) get placed in a "vandal bin" where we can only make one edit every 30 minutes to discourage vandalism, rather than banned permanently or for years.
Click to expand...

Lies, they ban anyone associated with kiwi farms on sight.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Troonologist PhD, Syaoran Li, Florence and 2 others
StraightShooter said:
Wonder how many of them still obsessively view this thread?
Click to expand...

Apart from laughing at the RW Josh page that Oliver made, there has been very little RW content here for a while now. Our resident RW Admin FuzzyCuck has not posted here for months. So, I suspect, the answer is - not many these days.

RW was so much more fun when we had the likes of Ryulong, Mona and that furry freak Kitsuelaine to laugh at.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: harry and Ineedahero
I stumbled on the article the RationalWiki has on youtuber Sargon of Akkad, who often makes anti-SJW content.

I found so many factually inaccurate statements, blatant attacks on his character and out of line comments that I thought, "there's just no fucking way this isn't satire". But no. These people are serious. They're not like Encyclopedia Dramatica like I first thought, you know the guys who write a bunch of crap for everyone and everything and call it satire. RationalWiki actually claims to be rational, which blows my fucking mind. These people are so dettached from reality that they think writing mean articles about someone makes them true.

The first of many faults I found is in the top lines, which is a quote from Sargon of Akkad:

SJWs are impervious to reason and are busy self-congratulating in their echo chambers and do not have any grasp on reality. —Sargon of Akkad, whose sense of irony was surgically removed

-RationalWiki, the epitome of an echo chamber full of self-congratulating SJWs that are impervious to reason and who have no grasp on reality

See, this is why I thought it was satire. We're reaching levels of irony that shouldn't have been possible even in actual satire.

This site should not be trusted for anything. There's NOTHING in their piece of crap article to give them credit for in the way of being non-partisan and objective; it's pure SJW propaganda. AVOID LIKE THE PLAGUE
 
Last edited:
  • Autistic
  • Informative
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Troonologist PhD, BlueChan, Francis E. Dec Esc. and 6 others
Zero chill said:
This site should not be trusted for anything. There's NOTHING in their piece of crap article to give them credit for in the way of being non-partisan and objective; it's pure SJW propaganda. AVOID LIKE THE PLAGUE
Click to expand...

I think you kind of missed the point of KiwiFarms..... we are here to mock, laugh and generally be amused. In that sense, a lot of RW content is gold and should most definitely NOT not be avoided at all.

Also, to be fair to RW they never really claim to be non-partisan and objective. Snark and sarcasm (always) and bias (often) are their modi.

And their older, more serious content on debunking woo and conspiracies is actually quite good. The amusement and milk is mostly in the more recent socjus ranting.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Uncanny Valley, Male Idiot, GethN7 and 3 others
The Kebab and Calculator said:
I think you kind of missed the point of KiwiFarms..... we are here to mock, laugh and generally be amused. In that sense, a lot of RW content is gold and should most definitely NOT not be avoided at all.

Also, to be fair to RW they never really claim to be non-partisan and objective. Snark and sarcasm (always) and bias (often) are their modi.

And their older, more serious content on debunking woo and conspiracies is actually quite good. The amusement and tard cum is mostly in the more recent socjus ranting.
Click to expand...

If someone thinks the point of Kiwifarms is to avoid lolcows, he really needs to lurk more.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Syaoran Li
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back