RLM's weakness has always been writing. They're the sort of filmmakers who focus on camerawork, editing, and other various bits of craft that make a film student's heart go pit-a-pat, but when it comes to the actual story being told, "serviceable" is all they're ever looking for and even that might not be a requirement. You can see this in their disdain for continuity (or "lore," a word I've come to despise), in how they brush off concerns about occasional plot holes, and how they talk about "the language of cinema" but never actual, ya know, language.
They very much strike me as the sort of filmmakers who would happily start shooting when their movie consists of just an outline and a few scenes, and I tend to doubt there's one among them who could turn out a decent screenplay.