- Joined
- Nov 10, 2022
Rise of Skywalker deserves to get an autopsy because it really was a massive failure. It failed to regain the audience TLJ lost, it shamelessly and incompetently brings back Harrison Ford, it awkwardly edits Carrie Fisher in when God had removed her from the movie, and the plot itself requires dumb plot devices like the WayFinder and I don't need to explain how dumb that thing is.
Mike Stoklasa isn't needed to explain it, either. Though it would be like shooting fish in a barrel (and get millions of views from middle-aged men who peaked when the Phantom Menace review came out), I doubt Mike will ever feel motivated to make a Rise of Skywalker review; simply because its flaws are so obvious and abundant and that any of us could record VO pointing them out in the Plinkett voice and produce the same audio track he would. Describing obvious plot holes and contrivances, then replying to yourself with "So...so why did you write it that way? Huh? Why? FUCKING TELL ME" is such a tired trope of Youtuber "criticism" that people would only be applauding out of nostalgia for the originator saying it.
Mike shitting on a Disney Star Wars film in the Plinkett voice for an hour would have no more twists, turns, or surprises than Dave Chappelle saying "Rick James, bitch" in a monotone. There's nothing more to Plinkett demand than people wanting to see the monkey dance one more time; and Mike's too much of a Gen X stereotype to give his fans what they want without half-assing it within some pretense of "irony."
Maybe that's why there really wasn't a ton of Plinkett style deep dives into it at all, there's almost nothing there.
I'd say that's the primary reason. Most of the clammering I've seen for a Plinkett ROS review in the years since the film's release don't care that there's nothing there for Mike to sink his teeth into - They merely feel entitled to hear their own grievances coming out of Plinkett's mouth (which is kind of a perfect burden for Mike; being as that's all Plinkett ever was to him).
I think TPM and AOTC could've been spliced into Anakin from kid, then flash forward to him as young teen and the start of the Clone Wars into one movie. ROTS was the only prequel that justified its length, and maybe even existence overall.
Many (including the he editor of The Phantom Edit) agreed.
I still don't understand their absolute hate for Rogue One which is still the best disney Star Wars movie IMHO.
I get that it's a low bar, but: What makes it the "best"? Like - when you watch it, what do you enjoy about it?
can someone explain to me why there being at-ats in Rogue One triggered them so fucking much but for some reason x-wings and tie fighter being used in a movie set 40+ years in the future was just fine to them?
They're fake film critics commentating through the lens of being fake Star Wars fans (I'm not sure even Rich had checked out EU stuff beyond Mike reading Wookiepedia entries for Vader's suit or LoBot as a joke in videos). So they're not actually going to notice what's out of place until they read someone else pointing it out, then either pretend they noticed it the first time or handwave it with "it doesn't matter. grow up nerds."
Last edited: