reddit General

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Chin of Campbell said:
No matter how braindead stupid his question is, no matter how simple, the answer isn't to google it, no. It's to ask reddit.
Click to expand...
I see these types of retards in r/skyrimmods all the time. They get told what youtube tutorials to watch and what to download and still can't figure out the most basic shit. I thought autistic people were supposed to be smart?
 
Mr. Racewar1488 said:
I see these types of retards in r/skyrimmods all the time. They get told what youtube tutorials to watch and what to download and still can't figure out the most basic shit. I thought autistic people were supposed to be smart?
Click to expand...

It's a spectrum, so it varies a lot. Sometimes you get a turbo-genius like Sheldon Cooper, other times you get a vegtable.
 
Toilet Grenade said:
It's a spectrum, so it varies a lot. Sometimes you get a turbo-genius like Sheldon Cooper, other times you get a vegtable.
Click to expand...
there's really 4 or so types of autism if you think about it. let me sperg on this for a bit.

Ranging from least to most severe:

Group 1: the normal people with ADD/Autism. They might act a little weird at times, or you might not notice it at all. Maybe they can't look you in the eye or some shit, but overall, they are very well adjusted, can fend for themselves, can do everything a regular person can, and have normal human interests like sports or movies, often times really good at one or two skills (construction, forming mental images for painting, etc). In other words, they can fit into society no problem. around 60 percent of the autistic spectrum are these people. You could argue their level 1 autistic by the DSM-5, but i'd argue there's only 2 levels that way, No support and Support needed.


Group 2: the Trannys/commies/Political extremists on both sides: a bit of a bump up in severity. Some "studies" have "shown" that autistic people are more likely to transition genders/be LGBT or asexual. You might also see a lot of self described communists, anarchists, etc, say their "disabled", and often have autism in it their disabilities as well. around 10 percent, including those on the opposite side (groypers/that one dude in your math class that listens to Andrew Tate and calls himself a incel, etc) I would put this number around.. 20 percent. Looks start to deteriorate from here, and also contain the majority of Reddit, Bluesky, and Tumblr. Also, there is a chance super geniuses can fall under this tier, due to savant syndrome. it's about 50/50 between group 1 or 2, depending how they fall along socially/exposure to the internet.

Group 3: Level 2 autism, as defined by the DSM-5. AKA, the dude who's really into trains and hates leaving the computer during class. you see this in high schools a lot. Typically need a lot more help with social skills, and has a 50/50 shot of making a actual living income. (NOTE: Group 2 and 3 can be combined to make Lolcows, Chris-Chan is a notable example), around 10 percent
Restricted interests and repetitive behavior traits at level 2 might resemble:
  • a high interest in specific topics
  • noticeable distress when dealing with change or disruption
Click to expand...

Group 4: The "how the fuck are you still alive?" tier. These are the autistic people RFK is talking about. the ones who punch walls for no reason, have mental defects, stims without controlling, etc. when people think "Special Ed", something like that comes up in their head. they won't be a productive member of society, and for some parents, are one of the greatest fears of having kids, right next to a dead kid, of course.
 
Last edited:
CoolFool said:
Another thing to consider, those top tier schools might have a lot of actual smart and talented people enrolled, but they also have a ton of people there that either paid their way in or got in for different reasons, like being part of a minority group.
Click to expand...
I saw a video once about voter registration tests that were given to black people during Jim Crow to prevent them from registering to vote. In the video, they were giving the same tests to students at an Ivy League school to show that they were impossible. Most of the students were black. They played up, "I just can't do it." The take away you were supposed to come back with was that the tests were racist since they were so hard that even people that got into an Ivy League school couldn't figure them out. My take away? These students were idiots. The test questions were sometimes tricky but they weren't that hard.
 
Peak Redditor moment…

A normal person wandered onto Reddit for whatever reason, and has a problem… His fiancé doesn’t like that he has developed an interest in religion!

IMG_1578.webp

Sounds like a normal problem. A fiance who doesn’t like that her partner isn’t the exact same person he was a decade ago… Maybe incompatibility?

Nah, you see, it’s all Trumps fault!

IMG_1579.webp

“Muh Handmaids Tale! Muh Marvel slop!”

Redditors aren’t people. They’re cattle or NPC’s at best (groomers at worst) who are unable to perceive reality unless it’s spoon fed through some capeshit or slop on Netflix.

Congress needs to pass a law that makes murdering Redditors punishable by a hefty fine or community service, instead of jail time. They’re clearly not conscious, self aware human beings. Half of them probably couldn’t pass a Turing test unless it was based on SW or some Netflix goyslop.
 
Len Kagamine said:
When they talk about losing rights what they really are complaining about is losing the ability to demand and impose themselves on others. As much as they cry about violence and how 6 gorillion troons a day are ritually sacrificed to JK Rowling, if they really did just live their life and minded their own business they wouldn't be bothered, at least in 1st world countries. No one is forcing you to keep this shit up.

They feel like not being able to control others' speech or impose themselves in an opposite-sex-only area is oppression. That right there is what really peaked me more than anything.
Click to expand...
It really is like every other religion.
 
Popper Vowel Race said:
The fact that both of the siblings had that specific "nightmare" at nearly the same time tells me that there is potentially some roofie fuckery occurring here. Even if you believe in kink positivity or not, this doesn't discard the fact that if you have someone in the household that you know wants to harm you, and you believe that the person in question is actively attempting to harm you, that person is probably a very real threat and really did mean to harm you in that instance.

The fact that the Redditor's instantly jumped onto kink positivity in this kind of scenario to guilt the OP shows that the average verbal skills amongst the commenters is around that of a six-year-old raised by monkeys in the Amazon. They can't even see any other context for why the OP mentioned the game other than "muh sex negativity".
Click to expand...

I'm also horrified but not surprised that Reddit says that this is all Mom's fault.
 
Mr. Racewar1488 said:
I see these types of retards in r/skyrimmods all the time. They get told what youtube tutorials to watch and what to download and still can't figure out the most basic shit. I thought autistic people were supposed to be smart?
Click to expand...
There is autistic "people" and then there is Bethesda fanboys. Skyrim is looked down upon in the RPG community for a reason, much like COD is in the FPS community.
 
Fapcop said:
IMG_1579.webp
Click to expand...
"Religion teaches people to believe things without evidence" - what do you consider evidence?
"Christianity doesn't have the best track record on it's treatment of women" - name examples.

Two questions, and I think neither will be answered, if asked.
 
SoleniyKraut said:
"Religion teaches people to believe things without evidence" - what do you consider evidence?
"Christianity doesn't have the best track record on it's treatment of women" - name examples.

Two questions, and I think neither will be answered, if asked.
Click to expand...
They consider links to articles they won't read evidence. The modern concept of science is just believing everything the right people tell you, AKA religion.

As for the second question, the answer is Handmaid's Tale, the rape fetish schlick story where they turned Christianity into Islam and it became theological canon.

The devil loves devotion, blind belief, and intense adherence to dogma, as long as it faces his preferred direction.
 
SoleniyKraut said:
"Christianity doesn't have the best track record on it's treatment of women"
Click to expand...
Christianity is literally several steps up from its contemporaries in regards to its treatment of women, what with how Jesus was all-in on "Treat women as well as you treat men" and "Women can actually guide men on their path to salvation". But here I am, having actually read His book and not just read a bunch of fedora-tipper talking points.
 
Chin of Campbell said:
They consider links to articles they won't read evidence. The modern concept of science is just believing everything the right people tell you, AKA religion.

As for the second question, the answer is Handmaid's Tale, the rape fetish schlick story where they turned Christianity into Islam and it became theological canon.

The devil loves devotion, blind belief, and intense adherence to dogma, as long as it faces his preferred direction.
Click to expand...
For the first point - I've observed that. I think some call it "Scientism"; As in, instead of applying the scientific method, they use it as a belief system. Which is idiotic because science cannot deal with transcendent phenomena (I.E Religion, Morals). It's just dumb people trying to appear smart. I'd understand if they would've quoted some kind of actual scientific report, and not only one - a multitude, to compare the reliability of a claim. But as I've observed, it's mostly opinion pieces.


I might give the Handmaid's tale a read, for clarity - although it may not be worth it. Your summary makes it sound amusing.
 
SoleniyKraut said:
I might give the Handmaid's tale a read, for clarity - although it may not be worth it. Your summary makes it sound amusing.
Click to expand...
The qrd on the story is more or less that excessive pollution caused an infertility crisis. During this crisis, a radical protestant sect was able to take over the US. During this, this sect illegalized certain sins against chastity, and effectively go around arresting women in violation of these laws, assigning them to party leaders as sex slaves in the hopes to increase fertility.
 
SoleniyKraut said:
I might give the Handmaid's tale a read, for clarity - although it may not be worth it. Your summary makes it sound amusing.
Click to expand...
So, I've read snippets of it. it's not Terrible, and it's not like a sperg out manifesto. Still retarded as shit, and the plot is unrealistic (which flies over peoples head when they see the show), but it's not badly written at all.
 
SoleniyKraut said:
I might give the Handmaid's tale a read, for clarity - although it may not be worth it. Your summary makes it sound amusing.
Click to expand...
It is quite funny that Canadians are so bereft of literature that Handmaid’s Tale is trotted out as one of their most acclaimed works. German lit has Goethe and Kafka, France has Balzac and Celine, Russia has Dostoyevsky and Tolstoy, America has Faulkner and Hemingway…and this is what Canada has.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom