- Joined
- Apr 3, 2021
Lets say (hypothetically) eager young political big brains decide to make a truce between the reddit tier JP/Joe Rogan fans and the 4chan Sam Hyde worshippers.
They decide to make an Intellectual-con were they both sit down on chairs looking smug and debate each other on issues they've researched heavily on Wikipedia. Each of them chose their smartest and most articulate individual for this debate. They will both debate on issues surrounding religion.
Who would win this intellectual debate and why?
They decide to make an Intellectual-con were they both sit down on chairs looking smug and debate each other on issues they've researched heavily on Wikipedia. Each of them chose their smartest and most articulate individual for this debate. They will both debate on issues surrounding religion.
Who would win this intellectual debate and why?
Last edited: