Regarding the apparent and imminent repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and the future of this website.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dear Null, you have had a brave and valiant run for freedom of speech. As a mother, I am very proud of you and am amazed by what you put into such an unpopular thing. In The Friends of Voltaire, Hall wrote the phrase: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it". You are still a young man with your life ahead of you and you have done far more than your part for freedom of speech and awareness of the insanity of humanity. If you shall leave the site, may you do so valiantly, and with no regrets. There is no creation without destruction and something else will pop up. Thank you for the fascination and lols at the expense of your time and money. And thank you to all who have contributed. We will all be Kiwis at heart and will remember your sacrifice. You had an extremely hard job and I really don't know how you did it, or what it involves, it is so far beyond me. You have valently served the people and Truth and Knowledge and Wisdom, if you must step down, it is ok, you are a young man that deserves a marriage and family and retirement if that is what you want. Or maybe just to go out and do fuck all. And when ALR and CCW die, we will salute you in true and honest solidarity. Thank you for your selfless service to humanity. Jesus loves you very much.


Can we archive this bitch?
 
Everybody here needs a lesson on regulatory capture. Who do you think has the money and connections to carve out exemptions and fight legal battles? What we are witnessing is an acceleration in the corporatization of the internet and it's frankly awful to watch.
 
This might just be the most ass thing to ever happen to the net if it passes.

Encyclopedia Dramatica will likely follow the exact same order as kiwifarms.

The only solutions to this are to hand the site over to a foreigner.

And let's face it there aren't many of those who could handle the level of autism and work that platforms like these require.

Infuriating.
Bro Encyclopedia Dramatica has been dead since like 2017, what we have now is a bunch of rapidly decaying clones of it. Like Palpatine in Dark Empire.
 

This might be the single most autistic thing I've ever read. I'm actually impressed. By the end of this I couldn't even tell if he is in favor of 230 repeal or not, supportive of Trump, or not. Not sure why a principal of Gab, at least that's who I think this is, would go onto thedonald.win and sperg, but there you have it.

100 percent this there was and gab explains why here

The Big Tech giants want to be regulated.

Yes, you read that right.

Big Tech knows that if online speech is regulated by the federal government, either directly or indirectly via regulation of tech companies, they can and will weaponize it against The People and stifle competition.

Big Tech oligarchs have tried everything to destroy Gab.com and stop our industry-leading free speech software from reaching the masses.

They banned us from both app stores, yet we still continued to grow.

Then they banned us from hosting providers, so we built our own.

Then they banned us from Paypal, Stripe, Coinbase, Square, and more. So we educated our community on free speech money and the great people on Gab started mailing us physical checks to keep the site online.

Then they blacklisted my family from Visa in a Communist Chinese Party social credit score-style form of tyranny.

Despite being banned by 25+ service providers including domain registrars, hosting platforms, app stores, email services, ecommerce services, and more: Gab has survived and continues to thrive.

Gab exists outside of the establishment’s control. They don’t like this, at all. Their monopoly on the free flow of information is coming to an end because Gab is inevitable.

When all else has failed, Big Tech and the establishment have set their sights on using Big Government to crush Gab and other alternative technology startups by destroying Section 230 and lobbying for regulation of speech on the internet.

Regulation will solidify Big Tech’s already overpowered and abusive market monopolies.

What folks need to understand is that Section 230 does not protect the speech of Big Tech companies. When Big Tech “fact checks” user content they are acting as a publisher and Section 230 immunity does not apply. As such, they can be held accountable for that speech.

Section 230 doesn’t apply to Big Tech’s editorializing. The First Amendment does. Section 230 only applies to content that users post on their platforms. It provides no protections for Big Tech’s own speech. They can and should be punished for the false information they are giving the public by weaponizing this editorialization of user content

In the case of the Coronavirus, Big Tech has been using the WHO as an “authority” on health related matters instead of official health guidelines from the President of the United States. This is a matter of national security and public health.

The same goes for editorializing election-related content. By “fact checking” one candidate and not another Big Tech is giving an in-kind campaign contribution of enormous and immeasurable monetary value to the Biden campaign. Big Tech should be investigated by the FEC for these in-kind campaign contributions to the Biden campaign. The RNC has filed a report on it, so let’s hope the FEC takes action.

Big Tech had record stock market performance under the Trump administration and how are they repaying him?

By helping the Democrats spread the Russian hoax narrative.

By “fact checking” him and not Joe Biden.

By censoring links to news stories about Joe Biden.

The President can and should trust bust the Big Tech monopolies, in particular Apple and Google’s duopoly on mobile app distribution along with Facebook and Google’s duopoly on online advertising and search. The only big reason he hasn't is because Big Tech stocks make up a significant portion of the stock market growth he likes to tout.

If the market needs to take a hit in order to destroy a domestic threat to freedom and the flow of information online then so be it. We do not worship the stock market in America, we worship almighty God. Your 401k gains aren’t worth the future of the Republic, sorry.

My point is: don’t fall for the Section 230 narrative. It’s a distraction. There are plenty of other things that can be done to stop Big Tech tyranny.

The President vastly underestimates how much influence he has online. Trust busting, FEC investigations, and more aside: if the President were to promote free speech technology platforms like Gab the Big Tech panopticon would collapse on itself and fast.

I just hope the President realizes this before it’s too late.

FWIW, somebody like Dinesh D'Souza has over two million followers on Parler. I'm not even sure Gab has two million registered accounts.
 
you're basically giving corporations free reign to fucking glass the entire internet.
They already do lmao, this is just doomposting. 230 is incredibly flawed, but this is just grasping at straws like every other thing Trump has said with regards to tech censorship.
 
KIWIFARMS BTFOED IT'S OVER JOSH
View attachment 1764652
ah gotta ban that some karen might sue, too bad so sad, also they talked about burning farms so some farm megacorp bot might send an automated legal letter to them gotta flag it down just in case

seriously this is the internet magapedes want the same but with flagging done with tenable legal threats probably automated with automated responses pretty much instabanning because of the sheer load of legal threats that need processed
 
Would 230's repeal effect archive sites?
Yes. The civil protections that protect the Kiwifarms protects the Internet Archive.

Anyways, if there is an actual, serious, draft of legislation that would revoke or significantly weaken §230, I hope we'll see the pushback that we saw for SOPA and PIPA way back when. It would probably happen, at least in this scenario. Nuking it would draw the ire of the people who control the masses. A compromise might still be shit, but it wouldn't be the doomsday scenario. Also Trump hasn't fulfilled most of what he's loudly declared he will do anyways, I don't see how much this is any different, considering he is now in lame duck status.
 
4chan isn't 4chan anymore. The jannies actually ban you for being edgy now.
People have always eaten bans for petty shit. "MODS = FAGS" is one of the oldest memes on there for a reason.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Osyth Osyth
Well, it was nice knowing you, Internet. We're slowly turning into Europe with draconian Internet laws because 1) fucking Trump cannot handle flags on his social media 2) boomers don't know how the Internet work 3) THE LIBS NEED TO BE OWNED.

Just know everybody will be affected by this oversight. Thanks a lot Trump.
 
This might just be the most ass thing to ever happen to the net if it passes.

Encyclopedia Dramatica will likely follow the exact same order as kiwifarms.

The only solutions to this are to hand the site over to a foreigner.

And let's face it there aren't many of those who could handle the level of autism and work that platforms like these require.

Infuriating.
The timing is just impeccable considering you just posted about rebuilding ED yesterday.

I doubt big tech is just going to roll over. They are probably going to pour million into lobbying congress to make sure it doesn't get repelled. This is could get them in so much trouble if its repealed willy nilly like trump seems hellbent on doing.
 
@Nulljust shut it down. tbh the sites trended toward being disqus for incels on one side and the youtube comments bar for people who cant stop getting banned for saying NIGGERFAGGOT. It was great when we talked about dopey autistic people and weird trannies but now its all about grifty youtube personalities who exploit the site as a means of gaining notoriety or people yelling about da nooz and da jooz. time to move on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back