Regarding the apparent and imminent repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and the future of this website.

[Pointless Pedant]

Why do you TDS gets so much attention? These people actually think that voting for the guys that want hate speech to be a felony would save the farms

I didn't vote for Biden.

 

[AnOminous]

Where else can I go and freely whinge about niggers and faggots?
Well done America, now your internet is essentially the same as China's.

Nowhere. It's done. Thank Trump. On his way out the door he takes a giant shit on the floor. Thanks you fat orange faggot, you killed the Internet.

 

[Gigantic Faggot]

Where else can I go and freely whinge about niggers and faggots?

Russia. The Democrats will have to post on Russian websites.

 

[Terrorist]

I cannot express my frustration at people, even "well informed" people like Nick Fuentes, who think CDA230 has anything to do with criminal enforcement of anything. I don't know how to spoonfeed any more so I won't bother.

The irony is that Nick and co. will suffer the most if 230 is repealed. No site wants the liability of having alt-right, white nationalists, etc. on it. To them, anyone expressing views to the right of Ben Shapiro may as well be a Breivik or Tarrant, no matter how good their optics are. All it would take is one lawsuit from the vexatious litigants at the ADL or SPLC over “stochastic terrorism” and every right-wing dissident would be sent packing.

Of course this is nothing new for the alt right, who fondle President Kushner’s balls despite him constantly shitting on them. If his EO about “anti-semitism” didn’t clue them in that Zion Don doesn’t care about free speech, nothing will.

 

[weegrumpy]

@Null thanks for all you’ve done. I found the farms too late, I’m heartbroken but I do get the feeling when you’re doing MATI, that you don’t love this anymore, and it’s as you say expensive and unfortunately a legal quagmire.
you’re a good boy, simper fi
F

 

[AnOminous]

The irony is that Nick and co. will suffer the most if 230 is repealed. No site wants the liability of having alt-right, white nationalists, etc. on it. To them, anyone expressing views to the right of Ben Shapiro may as well be a Breivik or Tarrant, no matter how good their optics are. All it would take is one lawsuit from the vexatious litigants at the ADL or SPLC over “stochastic terrorism” and every right-wing dissident would be sent packing.

Of course this is nothing new for the alt right, who fondle President Kushner’s balls despite him constantly shitting on them. If his EO about “anti-semitism” didn’t clue them in that Zion Don doesn’t care about free speech, nothing will.

I can't even get over the sheer stupidity of anyone supposedly right wing who thinks getting rid of 230 is good. You dumb faggots. I can go be a left wing faggot literally anywhere on the Internet. Where do you fucking have? If 230 is gone every fucking platform where right wingers can coexist in peace is DEAD. Do you even fucking get this? And you may wonder why I care, of all people, because if you don't get to talk we are ALL not free. Hey maybe I want to fucking hear what you have to say even if I don't agree with it. We are all less free, we are basically fucking slaves, thanks to Trump forcing the repeal of Section 230 by holding national security hostage.

 

[TaterBot]

Happy Birthday, Josh. Thanks for the memories, though few are good ones.
Time marches on, things come and go. So it is with this.

 

[Duke Nukem]

Section 230 or not, the end of sites like this is probably inevitable. I kind of saw the writing on the wall years ago, when IGN's Vestibule got pozzed and the mods went full on leftard. Or maybe it was always that way.

Places like this are not profitable or practical to run. But it was a good run.

America is going to end up being China 2.0 whatever happens. Even Trump betrayed us in the end. They all do.

 

[Sithis]

Come on man, don't pull a Jeff Hunter on us just yet.

 

[the fall of man]

If Section 230 goes then I will literally just post my bad takes everywhere, knowing that tranny jannies must take responsibility for whatever deadnames roll out of my mouth. Prepare your bodies for internet glory

 

[Eris!]

Biden has not yet suspended funding of our entire national defense because of his temper tantrum though.

Yet another way in which Trump is the superior candidate. Keep it suspended forever, please.

 

[Madako-Tako]

Now where am I supposed to go for spicy hot takes about losers on the internet?

So where do we go next?

That's what i'm wondering, any possible refugee sites will most likely bite the dust too, Most -Chan sites I used to go on are ghost towns.

 

[Sascha Vykos]

Its been a good run.

 

[AnOminous]

If Section 230 goes then I will literally just post my bad takes everywhere, knowing that tranny jannies must take responsibility for whatever deadnames roll out of my mouth. Prepare your bodies for internet glory

This. Punish these motherfuckers in every imaginable way. The revenge for this vile deed will be endless and cruel and relentless. I hope the people who were for this are ready for the repercussions.

 

[Eris!]

This. Punish these motherfuckers in every imaginable way. The revenge for this vile deed will be endless and cruel and relentless. I hope the people who were for this are ready for the repercussions.

Unfortunately no one is defaming me on twitter so I have no actionable causes.

 

[AnOminous]

Unfortunately no one is defaming me on twitter so I have no actionable causes.

So defame yourself and then sue the site. Wait until the law actually goes into effect though.

Did Congress of all fucking things actually just tell Trump to go fuck his own lame duck cuck self?

Defense bill released without Section 230 repeal, despite Trump's threats to veto

Republicans and Democrats in Congress have agreed to a version of an annual defense funding bill that does not include a repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which provides protections for social media companies like Facebook and Twitter to moderate their content.

www.newsweek.com

Well that's a shocker. They just passed the defense bill without a 230 repeal. Ball's in your court you orange faggot.

 

[MuuMuu Bunnylips]

So defame yourself and then sue the site. Wait until the law actually goes into effect though.

Did Congress of all fucking things actually just tell Trump to go fuck his own lame duck cuck self?

Defense bill released without Section 230 repeal, despite Trump's threats to veto

Republicans and Democrats in Congress have agreed to a version of an annual defense funding bill that does not include a repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which provides protections for social media companies like Facebook and Twitter to moderate their content.

www.newsweek.com

Well that's a shocker. They just passed the defense bill without a 230 repeal. Ball's in your court you orange faggot.

So can you stop whining now, @Null? I expect internet drama from other people.

 

[AnOminous]

So can you stop whining now, @Null? I expect internet drama from other people.

I'm looking forward to him actually vetoing it. I just want to see the shit fly.

 

[Kaktus Kompot]

Damn it, this was one of the last places on the Net that's actually fun and you could speak your mind with people who have different views and have insightful and funny discussions with. I'm gonna stay cautiously optimistic, like I always do in life, but if it's really the end, then so long, space cowboys.

 

[Cliff Booth]

I'm for sure late, but even if Trump vetoes, won't the new Congress and Biden pass a clean defense bill? I know this doesn't rule out something else happening with 230, but I just don't see this particular legislative strategy working.