Regarding the apparent and imminent repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and the future of this website.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Null said:
He could try to introduce new legislation and have it forced through before the 20th, but that'd be unlikely.
He could also veto and then congressmen who voted to pass the bill could decide not to override. This would restart negotiations on defense spending.
Click to expand...
It’s looking more and more likely that we’ll have some sort of government shutdown in the interim, closing the window even further on Trump being able to pull anything out of his ass aside green lighting negros to be put to death.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
Reactions: sanjuro, Candidae, Drowningman and 5 others
Null said:
Veto-proof majorities (more than 2/3rds) of both the House and Senate have passed the NDAA. If Trump chooses to veto anyways and is rebuked by these same numbers, it will be the first veto override of his presidency. Getting overriden by congress during the lame duck would be perhaps the most humiliating way possible to end his presidency.

There's a lot of "ifs".
He could try to introduce new legislation and have it forced through before the 20th, but that'd be unlikely.
He could also veto and then congressmen who voted to pass the bill could decide not to override. This would restart negotiations on defense spending.

i.e. not over yet, but if I gave this a 70% chance of working when I wrote OP, I'd give it a 30% chance now. The GOP is peeling away from him more strongly than I expected.
Click to expand...
Does this mean the OnionFarms will be less of a priority now?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: DarkCast, Uncanny Valley, Robert Sanvagene and 3 others
Null said:
Veto-proof majorities (more than 2/3rds) of both the House and Senate have passed the NDAA. If Trump chooses to veto anyways and is rebuked by these same numbers, it will be the first veto override of his presidency. Getting overriden by congress during the lame duck would be perhaps the most humiliating way possible to end his presidency.

There's a lot of "ifs".
He could try to introduce new legislation and have it forced through before the 20th, but that'd be unlikely.
He could also veto and then congressmen who voted to pass the bill could decide not to override. This would restart negotiations on defense spending.

i.e. not over yet, but if I gave this a 70% chance of working when I wrote OP, I'd give it a 30% chance now. The GOP is peeling away from him more strongly than I expected.
Click to expand...
Well I’m glad to hear it. The USA hosts most of the places I like. Probably because it traditionally has a less nosy government, although that seems to be changing.
Guess you’ll be sticking around for now Null..? I wouldn’t blame you for pulling the pin any time, and if you do I’ll just say thank you in advance for hosting some of the funniest online shit I’ve seen. You’re awesome.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: wokest bae, Candidae, BoobWhiskers and 17 others
Null said:
Veto-proof majorities (more than 2/3rds) of both the House and Senate have passed the NDAA. If Trump chooses to veto anyways and is rebuked by these same numbers, it will be the first veto override of his presidency. Getting overriden by congress during the lame duck would be perhaps the most humiliating way possible to end his presidency.

There's a lot of "ifs".
He could try to introduce new legislation and have it forced through before the 20th, but that'd be unlikely.
He could also veto and then congressmen who voted to pass the bill could decide not to override. This would restart negotiations on defense spending.

i.e. not over yet, but if I gave this a 70% chance of working when I wrote OP, I'd give it a 30% chance now. The GOP is peeling away from him more strongly than I expected.
Click to expand...
Mitch McConnell's a self-serving bitch nigger who would choke an infant for 5 extra minutes of power in the senate, film at 11.
Glad to hear the Boomers have stopped trying to break the internet for another month; Good luck with the Tamar lawsuit, Jersh
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Papadopoulos, Kosher Salt, Digital Thunder and 37 others
Null said:
Veto-proof majorities (more than 2/3rds) of both the House and Senate have passed the NDAA. If Trump chooses to veto anyways and is rebuked by these same numbers, it will be the first veto override of his presidency. Getting overriden by congress during the lame duck would be perhaps the most humiliating way possible to end his presidency.

There's a lot of "ifs".
He could try to introduce new legislation and have it forced through before the 20th, but that'd be unlikely.
He could also veto and then congressmen who voted to pass the bill could decide not to override. This would restart negotiations on defense spending.

i.e. not over yet, but if I gave this a 70% chance of working when I wrote OP, I'd give it a 30% chance now. The GOP is peeling away from him more strongly than I expected.
Click to expand...
Great job you old retard, you made yourself look like a fool in the last month of your presidency. Stop trying to ruin the Internet. We already have to fight Graham trying to open backdoors for Israel to crack encrypted messages.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Autistic
Reactions: secret watcher, sanjuro, Rossacciu and 20 others
Rustled Jimmies said:
Gentleman our right to say nigger remains.
I call this a victory.
Click to expand...
Even if the forum went down you'd still be able to say it in real life within the comfort of your own home (or outside in front of people if that's your thing). Unless you live in the UK.
More satisfying to say it out loud than just typing it anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeeperKissez
Desktop User2 said:
You probably couldn´t post this anywhere on the internet without section 230...
Click to expand...
on the "US" internet maybe and even without (part of) section 230 public figures in the US have weaker protection than the rest.

Actually part of section 230 just means the website owner is not responsible for what you post and not "lol I can post anything I want, I am not responsible for anything and nothing happens"

Also the poster you quote has now edited his post and is saying something about "boomers breaking the internet" which means imho he has no idea about when the internet started and how old it is and about the cookbooks and textbooks and things someone knew and loved and dead cows and back orifices when very likely he was still a baby shitting himself.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Enoby Way
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back