Regarding the apparent and imminent repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and the future of this website.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Girlboy69 said:
Despite my hate for the turtle-y old faggot, what McConnell is doing with the $2000 check thing is actually pretty fucking genius.

Because Congress repeatedly spends money on stupid shit, the country can't afford $2000 stimulus checks (we can but we can't) but because of optics, it would have to pass.

Trump is a crinkle-fag bediapered retard who wants Twitter to lose protections for calling him on his bullshit and because Diaper Don was trending, implying he shits himself daily. It would probably pass because congress is full of dinosaurs and boomers who don't fucking understand Section 230 or what repealing it would do.

The election integrity bullshit is just a poison pill that slides in under positive optics for Trump and his cult of personality's approval. It wouldn't pass because all Dems, the independents, as well as Romney, Murkowski, and Collins would probably vote against it.

So basically he saves the budget and vulnerable republican senators from the $2000 checks and appeases Trump by tying a Section 230 repeal to it. But it still might pass then they've fucked the budget AND the internet and a lot of economic/commerce things that go with it which would be lose-lose. So what does he do? He tacks on a pro-Trump, anti-Biden bill that poisons the entire fucking thing.

He's an evil genius and I have to appreciate the intricacies of this shit.
Click to expand...
Stop reading people's minds. Nobody's good at that, and neither are you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Griffbo, Fromtheblackdepths, big ups liquid richard and 1 other person
Drakonnan said:
Trump lost as the whites had enough of his shit.
Click to expand...
Even some of his staunch supporters like Pat Robertson has been fairly vocal about Trump's actions as of late. Lord knows what the Evangelists would think if they found out that Trumpy Boy wants to remove s230.
 
GOONCH said:
Unfortunately, here's how I see the Harris/Biden admin going:

1. They provide unique legal immunity to Big Tech (thanks to their donations, similar to how Amazon and Google pay ZERO income tax)

2. They repeal Section 230 to ensure Big Tech monopoly (crush Parler, reddit alternatives, etc.)

3. Trump can't sue Twitter, all of Big Tech is unaffected, rest of internet crushed

4. EU and the rest of the world goes right along. If the US can make Botswana legalize homosexuality, they can make them go along with this.

5. Entirety of surface internet is consolidated to just a few companies, all of which cannot be sued, pay no taxes, and have high representatives in the ruling single-party government (Texas flips blue 2024) and intelligence agencies.

6. I call SIGSEGV a gay bitch on the emergent kiwi.onion
Click to expand...
I hope your joking. I do not want a 1 world government because no one can fucking run it. They're all too braindead
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pilly-Chan, Rotollo and Fromtheblackdepths
GOONCH said:
Unfortunately, here's how I see the Harris/Biden admin going:

1. They provide unique legal immunity to Big Tech (thanks to their donations, similar to how Amazon and Google pay ZERO income tax)

2. They repeal Section 230 to ensure Big Tech monopoly (crush Parler, reddit alternatives, etc.)

3. Trump can't sue Twitter, all of Big Tech is unaffected, rest of internet crushed

4. EU and the rest of the world goes right along. If the US can make Botswana legalize homosexuality, they can make them go along with this.

5. Entirety of surface internet is consolidated to just a few companies, all of which cannot be sued, pay no taxes, and have high representatives in the ruling single-party government (Texas flips blue 2024) and intelligence agencies.

6. I call SIGSEGV a gay bitch on the emergent kiwi.onion
Click to expand...
Don't forget decriminalized weed and DC statehood.
 
verygayFrogs said:
I hope your joking. I do not want a 1 world government because no one can fucking run it. They're all too braindead
Click to expand...
A world run by 'Social Scientists' and lawyers.

What could go wrong?

(edit: this is a sarc. a difficult emotion to convey in text.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: [W]ehrSturmBrigada
"Section 230 should be revoked, immediately should be revoked, number one. For Zuckerberg and other platforms, "
And it should be revoked. It should be revoked because it is not merely an internet company. It is propagating falsehoods they know to be false, and we should be setting standards not unlike the Europeans are doing relative to privacy. You guys still have editors. I’m sitting with them. Not a joke. There is no editorial impact at all on Facebook. None. None whatsoever. It’s irresponsible. It’s totally irresponsible.
" says Biden.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: dumb idiot and whatever I feel like
Null said:
Fuck this retard.

This bill sucked and there's a lot about it passing which is not a cause for celebration. None of it involved a ChiCom plot to empower big tech or whatever the fuck this dumb faggot is going on about. He's literally just upset that his Twitter account is getting banned as soon as he's out of office and no one is willing to repeal crucial Internet legislation to spite them.

All those fucking retards going on and on and on about how this was 4D chess to get compromise on 230, how this was never about full repeal or whatever the fuck, here you go. He got cucked by the lame duck. The most pitiful way to go out. The only way this could get worse for him is if he did something stupid in January to try and stay in office and got booked under the Insurrection Act for it.

View attachment 1822393

View attachment 1822394
Click to expand...
It played out exactly like I said it would. They got a veto proof majority and just overrode him because they're not going to fuck up the entire internet over this cry baby's fucking vendetta because he was too retarded.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Sparklepants, Bunny Tracks, Pilly-Chan and 10 others
Had said:
"Section 230 should be revoked, immediately should be revoked, number one. For Zuckerberg and other platforms, "
And it should be revoked. It should be revoked because it is not merely an internet company. It is propagating falsehoods they know to be false, and we should be setting standards not unlike the Europeans are doing relative to privacy. You guys still have editors. I’m sitting with them. Not a joke. There is no editorial impact at all on Facebook. None. None whatsoever. It’s irresponsible. It’s totally irresponsible.
" says Biden.
Click to expand...

Hopefully he forgot he said that by now.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Totally Awesome and Had
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back