Trashfire Rekieta's Child Neglect/Abuse Speculation Thread - Designated crackpot theory shitting thread. All parties are assumed to be innocent, everything posted is fan fiction.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Methylphenidate and cocaine are about as different as you can get while still being in the same class of drug, psychostimulants.
They operate on entirely different biological principles. Ritalin, like the other amphetamines, is a phenethylamine chemical more akin to meth, pseudoephedrine, adrenaline, and the alphabet soup phenethylamines Shulgin was fond of and are often sold on shady darkweb markets, like 2C-B, 2C-E, 5-MeO, etc.

Cocaine, by comparison, is a tropane alkaloid more akin to scopolamine, atropine, and other alkaloids like those found in jimsonweed, and as bad as it is, is one of the more benign ones.

People with ADHD generally get an entirely different effect from the amphetamines prescribed for the condition, but cocaine works entirely normally on them, so using it as a treatment for ADHD is absolutely nonsensical, so is the kind of stupid shit I wouldn't be surprised if Balldo actually did.
 
This framing really just provides qover (albeit shitty cover) for crack lawyer's child abuse and it's not even true. Methylphenidate and cocaine are about as different as you can get while still being in the same class of drug, psychostimulants. That's where the similarities end. The molecular structures aren't similar, and cocaine is serotonergic whereas methylphenidate isn't.

There is really no rational explanation for giving your 8 year old daughter cocaine. Not even a slightly rational one. Let's not try to construct a shitty story for the skelly non-lawyer or try to justify (or try to predict how he might justify) child abuse.
No shit.

I’m saying this from a position of what the media would call “someone familiar with the Nick’s way of thinking…”
 
I just had a thought and Googled rohypnol and cocaine interactions. Found a thread on Reddit where someone asks if cocaine can be used to counteract ruffies, and it seems the prevailing idea is that it would keep you awake/reacting but you'd have no memory.

I'm very sad now.
 
I just had a thought and Googled rohypnol and cocaine interactions. Found a thread on Reddit where someone asks if cocaine can be used to counteract ruffies, and it seems the prevailing idea is that it would keep you awake/reacting but you'd have no memory.

I'm very sad now.
So even our worst fears that Nick raped his self admitted favourite child could, somehow be even worse than we thought.
 
I don't wanna get super far into this. I have gone back and forth in my mind if I believe Rekieta actually intentionally gave his daughter the cocaine or not (putting aside any reason for him to do that). Typically, I tend to believe that he did after I watch Nick Rekieta talk and get pissed off how much of a smug, lying, piece of shit retard that he is. But, I am currently of sound mind and will postulate my opinion:

I don't believe he intentionally gave his daughter cocaine. Nick is a retarded exobitionist who gets off on subtly admitting things without actually saying it. He likes to lie but drop little hints to the truth. Like with Hedo II. However, he's been very adamant about denying anything involving his daughter and cocaine, and he's had a consistent story: "I've never given my daughter cocaine, my daughter could not have ingested cocaine, the test is just obviously wrong." Btw: he's wrong about this, but it is a consistent story. I get the impression from him that he's a retard in denial rather than desperately cover something up.

In my mind, he left it out where his daughter probably got into it. May have been somewhere and got on her in some unsignificant, and she ingested it. It's possible that she continued to sneak it because she wanted more. Kids sneak cookies and shit, it's possible, especially when the parents are super zonked out and have no idea what's going on.

I feel like Rekieta responds to a lot of the allegations about his daughter because it distracts from the truth of the matter: it doesn't matter how or why his daughter got into cocaine (assuming that there's no nefarious reason, of course), it just matters that it was even possible.

I guess it's possible that Nick is eviler than we thought. It's sad that he has put into a position where someone could reasonably assume that he's a bad man that would hurt his child. There's way for him to come out of this situation looking good, even if his daughter hadn't tested positive for cocaine. He put his kids in an unsafe environment by having drugs and orgies under the same roof and on the same property as his 6 year old.
 
I don't wanna get super far into this. I have gone back and forth in my mind if I believe Rekieta actually intentionally gave his daughter the cocaine or not (putting aside any reason for him to do that). Typically, I tend to believe that he did after I watch Nick Rekieta talk and get pissed off how much of a smug, lying, piece of shit retard that he is. But, I am currently of sound mind and will postulate my opinion:

I don't believe he intentionally gave his daughter cocaine. Nick is a retarded exobitionist who gets off on subtly admitting things without actually saying it. He likes to lie but drop little hints to the truth. Like with Hedo II. However, he's been very adamant about denying anything involving his daughter and cocaine, and he's had a consistent story: "I've never given my daughter cocaine, my daughter could not have ingested cocaine, the test is just obviously wrong." Btw: he's wrong about this, but it is a consistent story. I get the impression from him that he's a retard in denial rather than desperately cover something up.

In my mind, he left it out where his daughter probably got into it. May have been somewhere and got on her in some unsignificant, and she ingested it. It's possible that she continued to sneak it because she wanted more. Kids sneak cookies and shit, it's possible, especially when the parents are super zonked out and have no idea what's going on.

I feel like Rekieta responds to a lot of the allegations about his daughter because it distracts from the truth of the matter: it doesn't matter how or why his daughter got into cocaine (assuming that there's no nefarious reason, of course), it just matters that it was even possible.

I guess it's possible that Nick is eviler than we thought. It's sad that he has put into a position where someone could reasonably assume that he's a bad man that would hurt his child. There's way for him to come out of this situation looking good, even if his daughter hadn't tested positive for cocaine. He put his kids in an unsafe environment by having drugs and orgies under the same roof and on the same property as his 6 year old.
The problem is that outside of the drug incident with the daughter, there is a whole constellation of other factors that point to her being very disturbed in ways that typically associate with molestation. And that's before you account for the fact that Nick is both friends with and frequently talks about pedophilia. I have a really hard time picturing either an 8 year old eating a bunch of cocaine or snorting it. She'd only need to barely taste it to figure out it isn't sweet or candy. And 8 is a pretty young age to understand the concept of getting high and try to experiment with that without any adult influence. I'd be more inclined to believe that it was an accident if the other pieces of information didn't exist.

It seems unlikely that she'd have such elevated levels of coke in her system from tasting it, anyway, unless she was eating mouthfuls. The stomach doesn't absorb nearly as efficiently as other forms of administration. She'd had to have snorted it which again seems like an 8 year old wouldn't be equipped to do effectively on their own.
 
If he did diddle his own kid, why would the authorities let him anywhere near them again? That's the big hole in the accusations people have against him
I wonder if when the kids were questioned they were only asked about the drugs and the general neglect and not about any potential diddling.
 
If he did diddle his own kid, why would the authorities let him anywhere near them again? That's the big hole in the accusations people have against him
If his 9 year old tested positive for cocaine, why would the authorities let him near them again, especially when his behavior indicates he is most likely still abusing substances? Unless they did a rape kit or asked the kids about sexual abuse there probably wasn't grounds to explore that angle anyway. Child SA flies under the radar every day.
 
Regarding Nick's consistency in his story wrt his daughter's positive drug test, there's honestly nothing else he can say without admitting to a crime. He has to attack the credibility of the test, but he knows that's all bullshit.

So what can we conclude from this? Well, if we know that he knows the tests must be reliable (with options for retests, etc) then there can only be one reason he isn't raising hell about where/how the daughter could possibly have ingested cocaine and it's that he knows exactly how it happened.
 
Regarding Nick's consistency in his story wrt his daughter's positive drug test, there's honestly nothing else he can say without admitting to a crime. He has to attack the credibility of the test, but he knows that's all bullshit.

So what can we conclude from this? Well, if we know that he knows the tests must be reliable (with options for retests, etc) then there can only be one reason he isn't raising hell about where/how the daughter could possibly have ingested cocaine and it's that he knows exactly how it happened.
Nick wanted the drug tests thrown out before the results even came back

He 100% knew and there's a very good chance he gave his kid the cocaine
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back